Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Re: Re: Case Steam Tractor
[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Bill Jones on April 12, 2002 at 10:18:03 from (67.241.18.96):
In Reply to: Re: Re: Case Steam Tractor posted by Allen on April 11, 2002 at 09:53:22:
The steam engines required boiler replacement and MAJOR overhauls at very close intervals. That meant money and labor and extensive shop space and equipment to do this.That and time to prepare for actual work was at best an hour or two-with a properly banked fire the night before,so the boiler had a little heat in it-requiring less heat to get the water boiling.Steam engines were and are VERY inefficient in their use of fuel;have you ever operated one? If you did you would know how much coal or wood it took to raise and maintain a head of steam.When boilers are used once or twice a year,the stress placed on the boiler is much worse than if the boiler were used every day like they used to be,because of expansion and contraction.The butt-strap and double butt-strap boilers can only take so much.that is why I said if you own a steam engine, it should be no surprise if the boiler needs replaced.The reasoning I said the engines were replaced by tractors was,in my mind,that in the 30's and 40's when the last of the engines were coming due for boiler replacement- the operators opted to spend less money on a new tractor,than spend more money on a boiler refurb,especially when the threshing rigs were becoming outdated,combines were on their way in.You will not find a "pristine"boiler out there-unless it's been replaced-MOST suffer metal fatigue and metal loss due to stress and corrosion. I was just saying that of the many engines out there today,that is why they were replaced with tractors-because the boilers were not in top shape and they were set aside just like all the antique tractors you see in fence rows all over the country.You know ,the ones that need the engines replaced.see what I'm saying?
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Ford Part Number Trivia - by Forum Participants. "Replaced by" means the part was superseded. All of my part books date back to 1964 and New Holland have changed some part numbers. They usually put the old Ford part number on the package. I was suppressed when I looked up the part number of the auxiliary drive shaft because for some reason the part number went through a radical change and it lost its "Basic Part Number". Ford part numbers follow the following rules. Most part numbers are in three parts. The middle part is called the
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|