Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Oliver, Cletrac, Co-op & Cockshutt Tractors Discussion Forum
:

Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
paweljip

05-16-2007 17:22:33




Report to Moderator

Hey guys

I'm looking at a 1755 diesel Cockshutt for $5500 that has 4500 hrs on it. Anyone have any advice on the good bad and the ugly for this model, engine, tranny etc? If you can just let me know your thoughts on it I'd appreciate it.

Thanks alot. Paul




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
paweljip

05-17-2007 18:31:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to paweljip, 05-16-2007 17:22:33  
Thanks for all the relies

I heard that maybe the later models had upgraded bolts and bushings in them? Anyone know if this is true or if there's a serial # cutoff where they started with the upgrades?

Thanks Paul



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
joe/pa

05-17-2007 15:49:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to paweljip, 05-16-2007 17:22:33  
I've been running my 1755 diesel for quite a few years and would sell it for anything. It's definately one of the best tractors I've had. Like MER and the others have said good maintance with the 310 is a big plus.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CumminsMan

05-17-2007 09:51:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to paweljip, 05-16-2007 17:22:33  
Totally agree with MER. The 1755 was one of the best tractors made by Oliver. The 310 is powerfull, efficient, and reliable if taken care of. We have a "75(last year) and it is by far the favorite on the farm.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MER

05-17-2007 06:17:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to paweljip, 05-16-2007 17:22:33  
Alot of guys bash the Waukesha 310 but we have a 1750 that would not be sold for any amount of money. It is extremely fuel efficient and dynos right at 110 HP and has never been turned up since the day it left the factory. It has about 6800 hrs. on it and does not use any oil. It has the 2 speed hydra power that has always been flawless. The hydraulics are strong and we have never really had any trouble with it. Many owners of these tractors will agree there is nothing like the sound of that Waukesha under a full load. Just my 2 cents.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paweljip

05-17-2007 20:30:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to MER, 05-17-2007 06:17:16  
110 horse isn't hard to take, is that off the PTO?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Don-Wi

05-16-2007 23:52:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to paweljip, 05-16-2007 17:22:33  
Well, for starters the price seems kinda high unless the paint is really good and so is the engine.

The trannies are built to take more HP than the 1755 is putting out, and are fairly reliable. Over/under's are also pretty good, don't hear about them going out all too often unlike IH's TA.

Now for our own experiences, we had a 1755 that was a money pit. It finally blew it's engine (think a spun bearing)a couple years ago. It had a bad shifter fork, replaced it, and within 50 hours or so the whole transmission locked up and was replaced with one from an 1855. The engine had some work done on the top 1/2, can't remember what was all done to it, but it wasn't cheap. Also had the injection pump rebuilt on it at that time.

If your's is a later model (there are slight differences to the location of the key/preheat button, etc...) it's worth a little more in my eye.

It has the same notorious 310 diesel (search the 310 in this forum) as was in the 1855's that blew up, but they weren't supposed to be as bad in the 1755 because they weren't turboed. Those bad 18's have since either been fixed or scrapped, and the rest are pretty good.

I know I'm not extremely fond of the 1755's, but we do have an 1855 which replaced it and it's been great. I'm also thinking of tearing into the 17 and fixing it up, even though it's already sunk us for close to $20,000 in repairs a few years back. That's part of the reason I want to fix it- after all those repairs, there surely can't be that much left to go wrong... can there??

Donovan from Wisconsin

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paweljip

05-17-2007 20:27:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to Don-Wi, 05-16-2007 23:52:39  
Hey thanks donovan!

Its real nice cond, its also Canadian $ :) so it's a bit different maybe I noticed that US prices for tractors seem to be better or maybe that's just me. Did you happen to know of there was serial number after which the factory started upgrading the motors in the 1755's or is that just wishful thinking on my part?

Thanks alot for your time buddy I appreciate it.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Don-Wi

05-17-2007 22:23:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to paweljip, 05-17-2007 20:27:15  
I'm not sure of the serial number break, but the key, shut-off, and pre-heat button locations are different from our 1755 to the 1855, the 18 being newer.

The key, pre-heat, and fuel shut-off(choke for gassers) on the older 17 is on the dash underneath the stering wheel, where as the later 1855 we have has the key and pre-heat button off to the side under the tach and the fuel shut-off is under the speedometer.

That's the biggest difference I can see right away between the newer/older models. Not sure how close they coincide with the updates to the engine, or if everything was changes all at once.

Donovan from Wisconsin

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ShepFL

05-17-2007 07:03:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to Don-Wi, 05-16-2007 23:52:39  
Hey Paweljip

My experience is very similar to what Donovan describes. I ended up selling my 1755 as it was a money pit, seemed everytime I turned around something was breaking. I would fix it then work a week and something else would fail.

Now in all fairness the rig was RODE VERY HARD and PUT UP WET!! I learned alot from that purchase as I was overly excited about getting a big Oliver, especially here in the Deep South (Olivers are scarce in this country).

My next venture into Big Ollies is finally to get a 1650 WFE DSL. Watch for updates real soon!

Below is a link to this same question I posted some time back.

HTH

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paweljip

05-17-2007 20:29:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to ShepFL, 05-17-2007 07:03:38  
Thanks shep, nice looking cummins repower on your site ;) if I had time and the knowhow and the $ I would think about doing that.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ShepFL

05-18-2007 11:17:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to paweljip, 05-17-2007 20:29:19  
Wish I could say those repowers were mine :)
That distinction goes to ShepVA!

When I get my 1650 then perhaps a future, future project.

Right now I am trying to raise $$ for tractor pull this fall. Sure could use some OLIVER POWER down here (HINT HINT FELLAs)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
gfs

05-20-2007 05:54:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Good bad and ugly on 1755 diesel? in reply to ShepFL, 05-18-2007 11:17:36  
What type of pull and can you make fuel cheaper. Probably can help with the olivers, just a long drive to Florida.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy