It's not about "giving up". It just amazes me that when given a set of numerical parameters that are mathamatically valid and a set of mechaical principles that can not deviate why there is an understanding problem. It's simple, you come up with an answer to the equation using said parameters and princples only to have guys throw out theoritical stuff to invalidate the answer yet can't explain how or why the parameters could be as they were if the conclusion was not correct.
Just like a discussion several years ago about where to check backlash on a ring gear, closer to the inner diameter, the outer diameter, or in the middle. In reality it makes no difference as both the inner diameter, the outer diameter, and the middle all move the same amount in relation to the pinion gear. If they didn't then the tooth faces would not be parallel, which they are and in fact have to be or you'd end load the gears and break teeth. That discussion went on forever and when all was said and done there were still guys that just "didn't get it".
As for this discussion I'm done talking and debating whether 2+2 equals 4 or whether there is something I don't know about that changes that answer to 3 or maybe 5.... All I know is I was in the car and it scared the imortal sh!t out of me and whether it was 150 or 160 or 130, I'm never doing it again.....
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - What Oil Should I Use? - by Francis Robinson. I keep seein this question pop up over and over again in discussion groups all over the web. As with many things there are often several right answers and a few wrong ones. Some purist I'm sure will disagree to no end with what I will tell you but most of us out here in the real world don't really care do we ? Some of them only bring their noses down out of the air long enough to look down them anyway. If you are like me you are only doing this old tractor stuff because you enjoy it. You
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
