|
Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Are Narrow fronts with Loaders always dangerous?
[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Joe Evans on September 24, 2000 at 20:56:13 from (209.41.235.125):
In Reply to: Are Narrow fronts with Loaders always dangerous? posted by MT Greenhorn on September 24, 2000 at 10:52:47:
MT: as the other respondees have noted, always use extra care using a loader. I've been around tractors and machinery my entire life and have generally heard that narrow front end arrangements are more unstable than wide front setups. They probably are not because of the simple fact that they have a "narrow front end". In order to accommodate getting the front wheels directly under the tractor chassis on a narrow front end design, the overall height of the tractor tends to be higher than a wide front end equipped machine thus a higher center of gravity and a bit more unstable situation is a result. When you think about it, all wide front end designs have a pivoting front axle or oscillating front axle as they are called--the entire axle pivots on a center pin. If you were to jack up a wide front end tractor high enough so that the front axle and wheels are allowed to pivot through their entire arc range, you'll see that the amount of swing is pretty significant. Since this wide front axle is allowed to pivot freely to a pretty severe angle, a wide front end arrangement (all things being equal such as center of gravity)in my opinion, does not improve stability over a narrow front end set up. How can an axle that is allowed to "tip" keep you from tipping over? The trick to improving stability on any tractor for loader operations is to adjust out the rear wheels for a wide stance and ballast the rear end by adding wheel weights, loading the tires (yuk!), or by adding ballast on the drawbar as absolutely as low as possible. Use discretion and good common sense in any case and you'll be fine. Joe Evans
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1958 FORD RARE 4x4 801 TRACTOR, ELENCO/FRONT DRIVE, FRONTLOADER AND WEIGHTED REAR WHEELS, FIVE SPEED, LIVE PTO, GAS ENGINE, NEW REAR WHEELS AND TIRES, ENGINE RUNS.
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|