Tractor Talk Discussion Board |
I don't think so . . .
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by jdemaris on January 02, 2007 at 19:15:05 from (66.218.15.7):
In Reply to: Re: Neighbor Put Fence in Road--Advice? posted by JK-NY on January 02, 2007 at 18:54:43:
I believe you are in error. I'm well read on the subject - I have to be. I've studied the state law as well as current case-law. With the latter, it pretty easy to do a word-search and come up with recent year's worth of court decisions in a particular area. There more then one type of "public road" in New York. So, the road first must be legally defined. I went to court about 18 months ago, and the attorneys and judge agreed with me. Also, I just got done reading the transcript of a recent case in Orange County, New York - not to far from me. Town tried to widen a road and the property owner would not let them. So, it went ot court. The town lost. Judge said it was clear that the road IS a public highway, but it IS a road by Easement by Prescription. And therefore, only the actual traveled portion can be maintained by the town - and no implied "extra" right-of-way on the sides. Here's a bit from the transcript: Town of Goshen v. Serdarevic, 17 AD3d 576 There is no dispute that the road has become a town road by prescription, pursuant to Highway Law § 189. The Town's interest, however, is limited to the actual extent of its use (see generally Danial v Town of Delhi, 185 AD2d 500, 502-503 [1992]). While that interest is, by itself, sufficient to establish the Town's entitlement to maintain the roadway and to be free from the defendants'active interference (see Town of Addison v Meeks, 233 AD2d 843 [1996]), it does not, by itself, entitle the highway superintendent to perform the work he has proposed on the drainage system that is located on the defendants' property without either the defendants' consent or the authority of [*3]Highway Law § 147. The defendants have not consented and the highway superintendent has failed to establish such authority here
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
My Ford Golden Jubilee - by Troy Estes. This article is about my '53 Ford Jubilee and a story that starts with taking the tractor to my brother's Starter/Alternator Rebuilding shop for a wiring fix. The generator was shot as well as all the wiring. I dropped off the tractor expecting a transformation from a 6 volt to a 12 volt system utilizing the original generator housing, and a total rewiring of the whole tractor. The front end center pin bushing was worn also so I ask that they replace it if they had time. Well, that’s wha
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|