Posted by drussell on January 13, 2020 at 05:46:13 from (137.200.32.22):
Truck is a 2000 F550 with 7.3 PS diesel. My question relates to the crankcase vent deletion mod. I've researched this and am finding two schools of thought. First is that the mod is a good idea as the oil that gets into the turbo and intercooler from the vent will gum things up, plug the intercooler and this will cause problems long term with the turbo and intercooler. Second is that it's a bad idea because the vacuum the turbo creates on the ccv is needed to help actually vent the crankcase and that deleting it also causes problems long term to the engine because it no longer is vented apprpriately.
I know that the length, size and number and degree of elbows that are placed in a pipe will restrict the pressure. I wonder if part of the problem with these mods is the size of the tubing, number of elbows, length of the tubing, etc, that are installed. The older engines that had the ccv vented to the atmosphere had a relatively short tube with one 90 degree elbow. This would cause significantly less restriction than a tube several feet long that winds and twists here and there eventually coming out well to the rear of the engine. I wonder if a short tube with no more than one elbow would adequately vent the crankcase on these engines.
What are your thoughts about this? Good idea to do the ccv delete, bad idea, won't hurt the turbo/intercooler, will hurt the engine, etc?
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo and video filesizes should be less than 5MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Usin Your Implements: Bucket Loader - by Curtis Von Fange. Introduction: Dad was raised during the depression years of the thirties. As a kid he worked part time on a farm in Kansas doing many of the manual chores. Some of the more successful farmers of that day had a new time saving device called a tractor. It increased the farm productivity and, in general, made life easier because more work could be done with this 'mechanical beast'. My dad dreamed that some day he would have his own tractor with every implement he could get. When he rea
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
For sale Farmall super A tractor is complete and has just been setting for awhile,it was running when pulled out of the barn,shouldn’t take to much to get it going asking 1100.00
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
