Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Digital farming question???


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by fixerupper on February 21, 2016 at 18:17:27 from (100.42.83.79):

In Reply to: Digital farming question??? posted by JD Seller on February 21, 2016 at 09:02:11:

I have about 4 linear miles of point rows on the land I farm, some are gradual and some are sharp angled, so I did some rough figuring on the seed saved and the yield increase if I had GPS controlled individual row shutoffs on the planter. With a 12 row planter I figured an average of five rows were double planted in the point rows and the yield reduction was in the 50% range from over pop. I did not come up with all that much loss over all. My seed expense is in the $100 per acre range and my corn yields are in the 185 bushel/acre average range.

Last winter I got to looking the planter over and it looked like all the chains needed to be replaced plus the bearings on the drill shaft and counter shaft. I forget what the replacement cost would have been but it wasn't all that terrible bad considering. Then I got to talking to a good friend who sells Graham electric planter drives and he had a set of used motors and harness for half of new price so I took the plunge and converted the planter to electric drives. Each row has a little motor driving it controlled by the planter monitor. No more chains, shafts, clutches, just a little motor bolted to each row with three bolts. About that time Precision came out with a deal where for $500 per year for three years I could get a new precision monitor that would retail for I'm guessing $5000. I can even set each row to a different population if I want to, depending on what the particular corn hybrid I plant needs. The rub is whenever that planter is planting Precision is recording what the planter is doing and how it is performing. I already had the Precision seed tubes and torque sensors on the planter from the first Precision monitor I bought four years ago. The whole works cost about $1000 per row. When the planting season was over I was really tickled with the system. The motors gave no trouble whatsoever. If a motor does conk out, replacing it takes 15-20 minutes max. There were no chains to jump, bearings to seize, clutch to goof up, it just plain simple. Each individual unit shut off at the end of the row, no need to stop and wait for the planter to raise at the end of the field, when it comes to the end of the field the planter stops planting whether I am stopped or moving so that adds up to a time savings and wear on the tractor clutch. Precision had a few software glitches on their end that hopefully will be fixed by now. My stand was near picket fence partly because of the smoothness of the electric motors. This was all being recorded on an Ipad, a map showing the field, my travel speed, roughness of the ride, skips, doubles, planter swath spacing, the works. Last fall I had the tablet in the grain cart in corn and I noticed a place where the corn stand had some stunted plants once in awhile. I looked at the recorded map on the Ipad and found the planter units were bouncing more in that spot, hence a rough ride. The stunted plants came from seeds that were planted either too deep or too shallow from the bouncing and came up at a different time from the rest of the plants. In that area I should have been watching the ride quality on the monitor and pulled the throttle back until I came to smoother ground. That is an example of the kind of information the new electronics can give us. I have time to watch the monitor because the tractor has auto steer.

Now, for the down side of all this besides the cost. If the planter quits planting for no reason, what do I do? remember, there are no chains, sprockets, shafts to check out, it's now all fly by wire. The cell phone has suddenly become the repair tool. I would call a tech for help if there was a glitch, that was all I could do. Most of the time it was in the software or programming and as the season went on I got so I could figure it out myself, but boy those first few times when the planter quit on me or would not start a new field map I was fit to be tied. The biggest source of frustration was the clunky way of programming the monitor like I had mentioned in another post but that is becoming easier by the year, not by the minute, by the YEAR! LOL Anyway, I am real picky about the way my machinery performs. So yes going modern is expensive and it requires an open mind to be able to slug through the first year, but I am more than glad I went ahead and made the change. There is absolutely no reason for me to trade my old planter for a new one unless I need something bigger and that won't happen at my age.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - The Nuts and Bolts of Fasteners - Part 2 - by Curtis Von Fange. In our previous article we discussed capscrews, bolts, and nuts along with their relative hardness and thread sizes. In this segment we will finish up on our fasteners and then work with ways to keep them from loosening up in the field. Capscrews, bolts and nuts are not the only means of holding two parts together. When dealing with thinner metals like sheet tin, a long bolt and ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Oliver 550 Diesel runs like a watch three point hitch pto engine gone threw about two hundred hours ago nice clean tractor [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy