Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Digital farming question???


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by JD Seller on February 21, 2016 at 09:02:11 from (208.126.198.123):

The adaptation of digital farming has really took off in the last five years. I maintain that very little of this digital equipment will actually pay for itself. The auto steer and swatch control MIGHT pay back their cost. Yield monitors and varying rate controllers not so much.

Controlling your distance so you have zero overlap or skips is an economic advantage BUT does it pay for the cost of the equipment????

The varying rate technology DOES not pan out cost wise. Example: The cost of doing grid soil sampling negates any advantage. You can apply extra fertilizer matching the cost of the varying rate technology and get a higher over all yield. I have studied the data and it back this up.

Yield monitors fall into this same category. Know what this LAST crop did down to the inch/foot does not help next year's crop that much. The reason being that the weather is a bigger factor after fertility. We can not control nor predict the weather for six weeks let alone six months. So this technology is "neat" but really does not pay for itself.

The biggest waste of money is much of the corn planter stuff. Automatic row shut offs DO pay for them selves. The electric drives units and lots of the other "Precision" stuff do not. You can take "normal" corn planting equipment and get 95-98 percent planting success. You can spend tens of thousands of dollars and maybe raise that 1-2%. With corn prices where they are you can never regain the cost of the improvements.

I think that we are seeing a bunch of second, third, generation farmers playing with the forefather's assets. They will find that their income cushion will not stand the high cost of digital toys with cheap commodity prices. It is going to be the lowest cost producer winning again for several years. So spending thousands of dollars on stuff that does not positively impact income will not work for long.


Replies:




Add a Reply!
You must be Logged In to Post


:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial No List 
Return to Post 
Upload Photos/Videos
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo filesizes should be less than 300K and Videos, less than 2MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - History of the Nuffield Tractor - by Anthony West. The Nuffield tractor story started in early 1945. The British government still reeling from the effects of the war on the economy, approached the Nuffield organization to see if they would design and build an "ALL NEW" British built wheeled tractor, suitable for both British and world farming. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Oliver 550 Diesel runs like a watch three point hitch pto engine gone threw about two hundred hours ago nice clean tractor [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy