Dave, I'm no lawyer, yet the account in the link is very incomplete. I assume that CID is the Army equivalent of CGI. If their investigation does not provide enough evidence that a crime has been commited, a suspect is usually considered innocent/cleared. That's the end of it. Any of us who have done a career in the service have been investigated for a crime. If CID, CGI in my case, report back to the command that not enough evidence exist to conclude a crime has been commited, it generally ends there. This is how commanders get to say that there is nothing personal when they dispose of charges. To be bluntly honest, I have never seen a case go any further than an Investigation Service that concludes that not enough evidence exist to show a crime has even been commited. That said I have great faith in the randomly seleted Court Martial boards. It is unfathomable that these officers acted in anyway negligent in considering the guilt or innocence of the accused. There is no doubt in my mind that if this board found guilty, despite an Investigative Service report as such, that other evidence had to have been presented beyond questionable testimony. These officers are not slanted against the member. They are not even members of the members command for a general court martial. They have no ax to grind against him. If it was, however, proven that this court martial failed to give diligent consideration to the accused, it would be a greater scandal then an opportunist prosecution.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Madison's County - by Anthony West. Philip Madison has been a good friend of mine for quite some time. He has patiently suffered my incessant chit chat on the subject of tractors for longer than I care to remember, and on many occasions he has put himself out, dropped what ever it was he was doing, to come and lend a hand cranking handles, or loading a find onto a trailer. Although he himself has never actually owned or restored a tractor, he was always enthusiastic and always around helping with other peoples projects.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1965 International Harvester McCormick Farmall cub tractor 2,500. Two owner tractor. My grandfather bought new in 1966, then we inherited it. Have all the paperwork original manual and all maintenance records. It starts and moves. Comes with underbelly mower, plough, and some other attachments.
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
