You are reading more into my response than was intended. What I have posted is that companies have a policy of compliance because that is in their best interest. I mentioned that the clerk may have caused the situation to escalate to firing by attempting to defend himself (which no where did I say he was not personally entitled to do so). When looking at policies like caused this man to get fired you need to look at the whole entire picture and what could happen.
Imagine this: Two masked armed assailants walk into a pharmacy. They hold the employees at gunpoint demanding prescription narcotics...
ending 1. When one of the assailants points his weapon at the pharmacist and demands the narcotics the pharmacist, as calmly as possible, gives the assailant what he demands. The assailants leave the store.
ending 2. When one of the assailants points his weapon at the pharmacist, the pharmacist, knowing his right to self defense pulls out his personal weapon. The situation has now escalated and the assailant fires or attempts to fire at the pharmacist who returns fire. In the gunfight (which is perfectly legal) an innocent bystander (let's make it a 6 year old girl there with her grandmother just for effect) is shot and killed (and it doesn't matter by whom).
A company would rather have 1000 of ending 1 than a single ending 2. It is for that reason they have policies like the one this employee broke. In this particular case no one was hurt and I think everyone is thankful for that. However you cannot base policy on the outcome of what happened. "Community mourns after 6 year old dies during gunfight between robber and Walgreen's employee" is not a headline the company ever wants to see. Ever.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Sunday Drives - by Cowboy. Summer was finally upon us here in Northern Maine. We have two types of industry up here, one being "Forestry" (Wood Products) and the other "Farming" (Potatoes). There is no shortage of farm tractors and equipment around here! I have been restoring old Farm Tractors for the past 6 years, and have found it easier and less expensive to hit all the auctions and purchase whole tractors for parts needed. My wife who works at a local school, and only has weekends and summers off, while on t
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
