Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: A Few Questions
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by CNKS on February 25, 2006 at 10:00:11 from (204.249.178.138):
In Reply to: A Few Questions posted by Mark on February 25, 2006 at 09:12:46:
I don't consider it ugly, my dad had two of them for cultivating vegetables when I was a kid. I only got to drive them for one summer when I was 12, then the bank repocessed them and he had to start over (in spite of all the talk about farmers going broke, it is nothing new). The B was classed as a two row cultivating tractor, the A/Super A was a one row. It was good for it's intended purpose. The C replaced it, because of the WWII it was replaced a little later than intended. Some people say it should have not been manufactured, perhaps the C and A should have been manufactured, not the B. This is my speculation, but IH at that time was leaning toward smaller tractors, perhaps they thought a C like tractor appeared too big, although the engine is the same. The tractor market at that time was a little confusing. As to my dad's B's, for what he used them for, an A would have probably done the same thing. He bought the first B sold in my home county, probably because the dealer had a B and not an A. The B will turn shorter than the A, an advantage in our small fields. He liked it and bought a second one 4-5 years later. He never owned a C but did have two H's. In those days there was no mounted implement shared between tractors. If you had an A and B, you needed implements for both -- the C did not change that. In more modern times -- I own a 460 Hi Utility, I don't understand why it was made -- likely higher clearance for tobacco, etc. But there is a 460 row crop, with the same or more clearance, particularly with a NF. If you didn't want to cuiltivate, etc, there was the low profile 460 utility. Only advantage I can imagine is that the wfe on the 460 Hi Utility allows it to be shorter and have a shorter turning radius than the row crop WFE, but not the NF. There were simply too many models, likley one of many reasons IH is no longer with us.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
The Day Mom Drove the 8N - by Brian Browning. My Dad was wanting to put in a garden but couldn't operate the 8N and handle the old horse drawn plow he had found and rigged up to use with the tractor. Well, he decided to go get Mom out of the house and have her drive the tractor while he walked behind the plow. You got to understand that while my Mom is a hard worker who will always help whenever she can... she had never operated farm machinery before that day. Dad got her out there, explained how the clutch was the same as in our o
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
18-32 Case Cross Motor
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2025 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|