|
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Tractor Rollover Safety - WF vs NF
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by jmauss on February 11, 2006 at 06:55:10 from (64.198.83.226):
I've just been thinking a lot about tractor safety and rollover potential. I have a 350 Utility which, of course, has a wide front. It seems very stable, but I don't really know at what point it would roll, and I never want to find out. There is an old logging road in my woods that is grown over and has probably not been used in 30 years. I'd like to clear that road so I can get to the bottom to mow. The only way right now to get to the bottom is through the neighbors property. That works okay as he is a great neighbor (no legal access easement, just good neighbor), but I would like my own access. The road on my property is somewhat steep in spots, and I don't want to take any unnecessary chances, so I have been trying to decide if it is worth the bother to clear it. The access through the neighbor's property is more gradual. So my question is how concerned should I be about the potential of a 350 utility to roll over? I know the answer is that any tractor can roll over, and I have no intention of going beyond my comfort level, but I'm sure that most people in a rollover did not intend to go beyond their comfort level. How much better is a WF than a NF tractor from a rollover/safety perspective? I wonder if there are any statistics about the percentage of tractors that rolled, how many were NF vs WF. It seems there is a false sense of security, at least in my mind, that a WF is that much safer than a NF, but I don't know. Safety first. I would just like to get some other perspectives. Thanks. Joe
Replies:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
History of the Nuffield Tractor: Conclusion - by Anthony West. In the last piece I mentioned that Nuffield had reached the stage where they had chosen to drop the "Universal" from production. The two new models were given three figure numbers, instead of "three" and "four". Model numbers were introduced to help farmers and dealers instantly recognize the engine size and horsepower of the tractor, the 4/60 had a four cylinder diesel engine which developed 60 bhp at 2,000 rpm. The 3/42 had a 3 cylinder diesel engine which produced 42 bhp at 2,000 rpm. Th
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1952John Deere MT tractor
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co.
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|
