|
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: forum ideas?
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Paul in Mich on December 02, 2003 at 12:41:35 from (24.231.161.191):
In Reply to: forum ideas? posted by Nebraska Cowman on December 02, 2003 at 04:27:42:
Cowman, I have read and re-read both your post and the replies to be as objective as possible. While I believe your suggestion was made with the best intentions in mind, and I agree that sometimes we leave ourselves vulnerable to less scrupulous people, on balance, I think that the format for this forum is as we all would wish all forums to be. I think if we were to set up a link where membership vis-a-vis Aditional screen name, and password were required for entrance, then we end up with an elite group and deny each the input that attracts us here in the first place. We would be speaking to the choir in a sense because the wealth of information and experiences would be left at the door. I have to say that I have learned volumns here since I have been comming to this forum, buth from the "Pros", but also from the experiences of novices who may make a mistake that is shared so that I wont have to make it myself. I have gone to the Puller's forum on occasion, and have seen what happens, even in an open forum, when competing ideas as opposed to shared ideas on the rest of the forums. I realize that spammers and scamers can be a pain, but I think most of us have shared enough experiences with both that we should know by now how to discern what is legitimate and what isn't. Therefore, it is my opinion that YTMAG has done everything it can to create a positive atmosphere for all of us, and it is up to us to keep it that way and not to create a cumbersome format that will benefit a few but exclude others. We need everyone, and everyone's input openly. Thanks for your suggestion, Cowman, as it made me think before I responded.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
| Order Support
Today's Featured Article -
History of the Nuffield Tractor: Conclusion - by Anthony West. In the last piece I mentioned that Nuffield had reached the stage where they had chosen to drop the "Universal" from production. The two new models were given three figure numbers, instead of "three" and "four". Model numbers were introduced to help farmers and dealers instantly recognize the engine size and horsepower of the tractor, the 4/60 had a four cylinder diesel engine which developed 60 bhp at 2,000 rpm. The 3/42 had a 3 cylinder diesel engine which produced 42 bhp at 2,000 rpm. Th
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1952John Deere MT tractor
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2026 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|