Re: No.45 and No.46 balers ?

Posted by randy hall on January 12, 2003 at 15:47:05 from (209.11.237.25):

In Reply to: No.45 and No.46 balers ? posted by Wardner on January 12, 2003 at 15:11:08:

there is no comparison. the 45 was a small capacity lightweight baler this is considered a baler to stay away from as they were worn out forty years ago. the 46 was a real baler and would about kill one man stacking on the wagon, but i haven't seen one that looked like it would work in a long time. all the advertisements that i have seen for the electrall show a model 55 baler.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Re: No.45 and No.46 balers ? Charlie 15:24:43 01/13/03 (0)
• Re: Re: No.45 and No.46 balers ? David Ransom - This 46 works :-) 22:15:47 01/12/03 (0)

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: No.45 and No.46 balers ? Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]