Re: Farmall H M widths

Posted by Hugh MacKay on April 01, 2007 at 03:07:42 from (216.208.58.187):

In Reply to: Re: Farmall H M widths posted by CNKS on March 31, 2007 at 20:04:33:

CNKS: Don't agree, for well over 15 years I ran my 300, 560 and 656, 72" wheel tread with wheels dished out. All were the same setting on rim bead. The 504 I had briefly was the same. On all 4 tractors the hub was clamped to the axle within 3-4 inches of axle housing. As I recall 504 and 300 were close to 4" and 560 and 656 closer to 3". You can only slide those wheels in to the axle housing. Unless math has made some drastic changes since I went to school, I can't see more than 2-3 inches difference between large and small chassis

In about 1 hour 20 min., I'm going away for a week, thus I will not respond again. It could be the H was not as wide across the axle housings, it's a long time since I worked with an H on a regular basis. I agree the axles were shorter. Once we get into 00 series and onward all standard axles were 84" large or small chassis. From the above paragraph, I'm satisfied they are very close to the same at the axle housings.

Replies:

• Re: Farmall H M widths CNKS 11:40:42 04/01/07 (0)

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]