Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

OT - Economics

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Spook

04-11-2008 13:12:21




Report to Moderator

I watched the talking heads on TV discuss the latest meltdown in the financial markets, and more talk on how the government should subsidise the banking and financial corporations. I really think that this is backwards. They are treating the syptoms, not the disease. If people had decent jobs and healthcare, they could afford the mortgages and consumer debt. Am I wrong?




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
utupuller

04-12-2008 08:09:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
I was going to add a long reply but decided not to, instead I will say this. To many people have put there bibles down, sadly to say I feel people off towards greed and materialistic objects instead of loving thy neighbor as if it was yourself



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
tlak

04-12-2008 07:34:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
Interesting how some of you want the whole country to fail so people can be taught a lesson.
I have various relatives, didn't pay bills, go to work and fifty years later they're the same way. Some of y'all are like this or have relatives like this and I don't particularly care for the whole country to fail to teach this segment a lesson. Bush is one of these.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
gene bender

04-12-2008 05:02:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
The first thing is how to manage their MONEY and that seems to be a lost art. O well the govt will bail me out.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
730 virgil

04-11-2008 21:46:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
mrs 730 lived in batavia il before she became a country gal. it is surprising to see all the building going on there houses, malls, roads. her dad had 10 and 1/2 acres is now a warehouse and truck terminal. local realtor has sold many farms to people pushed out of there by development john always says to me virgil i can't understand it. where is all of that money coming from? i've been in this business 50 years haven't anything like this.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Alex.C

04-11-2008 19:53:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
The thing I've been saying for years.The home builders(developers) and the housing system, mortgage, ect. could, would and will bring this country down. No regulations or any thing and they get to do what they want.Why? cause the gov. gets tax money off those houses and didn't care what they built over or on top of. Why just blame the lenders ,they were just responding to demand. Why not blame the builders and the banks? Money! as I said above the gov. gets tax money off those houses and didn't care what they built over or on top of. The builders, banks, lenders and gov. knew that there was a glut of houses and did they do any thing? No. Have the banks done any thing to stop the bleeding? No. They are still giving out Huge loans to builders to keep building. Why? They seem to think that people are still buying homes like they were 2years ago. The only way to solve the problem now is to hit rock bottom and hit hard so that we'll bounce back up(hopefully). The problem is not helped by the fact that most people these days you could tell them that if you built a ramp, put on roller skates, farted and lit the fart that you could jump the grand canyon, they would do it, there just that stupid and unfortunately you can't change 'um. One possible fix for that is to spay and nuder 'um but that would mean that 2/3 of the U.S. would have be and thats to much to ask for an under educated population to under stand. The only long them fix is to rebuild the education system and a complete government over haul, hopefully no civil war but if thats what it takes then let it roll. Ok,I'll zipit now and finish this cold turkey sandwich of mine. Alex

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Eric SEI

04-11-2008 19:41:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
Afford which mortgages? A good number of these people could have afforded mortgages on houses that they could afford.

Earlier this week on one of the morning news shows they were talking to a couple in danger of losing their house. They mortgage payment had quadrupled. They had put $500,000 down on a $1,500.000 house, with a mortgage that let them pay just half the interest with the rest being added to the principal. When the loan reached 110% of the original amount full payments had to be made. Their payments went from $2,000 a month to $8,000 a month. She was a real estate agent, she knew what she was doing.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
msb

04-11-2008 19:32:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
Huh? Did you know jobs are still going overseas as we speak ? SIL works for a MAJOR and has to go tell the employees who just took a voluntary wage cut that the plant will have be closed. The company cannot compete with China and India and their same quality products(yes, same quality). US made products are not selling when competitor merchandise is 10 times cheaper.Nothing Washington can do to stop this. Depression---here we come.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
john in la

04-11-2008 18:19:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
third party image



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Coffee Helps

04-11-2008 18:02:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
Spook, you seem to be correct. But I would not want to be a U.S. Senator or Rep. making these big Economic decisions. One wrong vote could hurt a lot of people, not to mention you lose the next election. Personal responsibility seems important: if I see a nice tractor I can't pay cash for, and it would need a big garage I don't have, I don't whip out a credit card and buy them. rrlund- nice reminder of Will Rogers, who was a bit before my time.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
NE IA

04-11-2008 18:02:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
Not here to point fingers nor play politics.

Alot of the young ones are in trouble, but what did they see growing up? Many of us got wealthy because of inflation weather we insist it was nose to the grindstone 24/7 that we tell our kids about. We lived through better times, and the ones that bought houses, farms, equipment etc. are the ones who "won". Anyone who got ahead maybe did not just pay rent. Little doubt our net worth has alot of inflation if we actualy admit it. When we lost our jobs there were many to choose from compared to today. NO NO NO not the ones that won't pay the gas to drive us to work--they don't count in my book.

Yea kids seem to never want aunt Joans old furnature because they could make the payments on new, and the finance companies chased them all the way to forclosure. They had a idea what dad made for wages, and they are making three to four times that, so why could't they afford it?

I know government run healthcare is not supposed to work, I got news for you... it can work. The problem is managment. The VA is government run, and I could not so much as ask for better care in Iowa City or Dubuque IA VA. In the last five years I have spoke to less than a handful that were unsatisfied. Anyone care to poll any other hospital? There are VA's that are bad news at best, but it has to revolve around managment. I'll give ya this, that usualy government seldom adds value, and never makes much stuff better as we all know.

Good jobs are few and far at best, and it looks to me like only the tip of the iceberg. Us old folks seen this coming, and we cried wolf for years, but then we was wrong for many years after we first cried out. Pretty sure we are in deep doo doo now, and we all kinda give up. Anyone can come up with numbers, but each and every one of us has alot of debt to pay off, like $32,000.00--$42,000.00 to pay off our national debt. Probably the politicians have a cure or means to do fix that. Does the dirty words higher taxes seem like their cure?

Big business is driving the country now, lower wages. Sender over the pond happens when they can't find min. wage or less helpers.

Good to hear they are wanting to hold off forclosure for the distressed homeowners. Bet we will send the money to the bankers instead of the homeowners. Sure hope we don't have to mail out letters telling them it's coming cause that gets costly I hear.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
tlak

04-11-2008 17:51:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
Why aren't the mortgage people in a conga line to prison like the Enron people?
What's different between the trucker strike and whats going on with the airline? Why don't the bring all the acreage out of farmer welfare to grow corn and wheat?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
NE IA

04-11-2008 18:09:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to tlak, 04-11-2008 17:51:35  
tlak, if the bad weather ever goes away I won't have time to shoot my mouth off, but till then....

I have made the remark that CRP acres are paid for by tax dollars so we own the crop. Why not pay a fair price to plant and harvest a corn crop instead of weed crops. Then we own the corn crop that gets turned into fuel for our military, federal, or state owned vehickles?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ted regentin

04-11-2008 17:50:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
All of the posts are missing the point. Two interrelated things are happening right now. First the war in Iraq is pouring money down a rat hole. Along with the war the government is inflating the money supply through deficit spending. This has the effect of diluting the money supply which is a true definition of inflation. (Has anyone taken time to wonder where this six hundred dollar kicker is coming from?) Our government is borrowing money from the fed which creates it out of thin air. Add on to these sad facts, we have lost our manufacturing base, replaced with service sector jobs. The US is not that far from becoming a third world country. HANG ON TO YOUR HATS,IT IS GOING TO BE A BUMPY RIDE. One thing I can tell you for sure, in hard times those who have the least debt have the best chance of surviving.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chris in MO

04-11-2008 17:04:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
I've said it before, I'll say it again.

Years ago my wife and I saw the handwriting on the wall, as it were. We could see that the only way we could afford to live the modern version of the "American dream" was to make all the sacrifices we saw those around us making. Such as two incomes and all the accompanying expenses. Such as turning the care, education and responsibility for our children over to the "hired help". Etc, etc.

These were sacrifices we were unwilling to make. So we found a piece of land for which we could pay cash. We then proceeded to rent until we could build a house, again for cash. It took an awful long time, but the end result is that we own free and clear what others took advantage of "easy financing" to get 15 or more years before we did.

That being the case, I would have to say that constantly spending more than you earn is a no-win situation. I know the national economy relies on us fulfilling our patriotic duty of spending our entire paycheck as quickly as possible, but individually it is lunacy. The only solution to this problem most of us can access is not at the ballot box. True, there are significant differences between the two major parties. Economically, the differences are insignificant, in my opinion. No matter who you vote for, they're going to screw things up economically. The solution is with Americans growing up and no longer playing the game. Too much to ask? Probably.

Okay, I'll shutup and go back to listening to the conversations here at the coffee shop.

Christopher

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
rrlund

04-11-2008 16:12:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
ANY bailout is just postponing the inevitable. The sooner things go to h*ll,the sooner everybody will learn their lesson and won't do it again. I can tell you about somebody that I'm close to personally,their forclosure notice has been in the paper a couple of times. He had the chance to get a truck from work,cheap,just for transportation. His wife said "I'm not driving that". She just went out and spent 10 grand that they didn't have on something better. That's the kind of mentality that has to stop. It's called Keeping Up With The Jonses my friends. Has nothing to do with good jobs or healthcare.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kelly C

04-11-2008 17:26:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to rrlund, 04-11-2008 16:12:59  
I agree. the only reason that homes cost as much as they do is because stupid people are paying that much for them.

Granted I have seem a few that purchased high priced homes just to sell for a proffit to earn enough for a good part of the home they planed to live in.
Some made it some didnt.

No way that one whole income should go to housing. Thats just stupid.
And my friends that is not the government making people do that. Its greed and coveting.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
rrlund

04-11-2008 17:11:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to rrlund, 04-11-2008 16:12:59  
One thing I forgot to ad,for those of you too young to have ever heard or read Will Rogers. He said this is the only country in the world where a person can DRIVE to the poorhouse in a new car.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Gun guru

04-11-2008 15:16:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
I know that if Any consumer of a home mortgage is faced with uncertain house payments (like adjustable rate mortgage) a persons finances can and might get screwed. Also the Interest only loans that the banks pitched for a few years was and is super ignorant on the part of consumers to purchase. How stupid is that...buy a home having no equity in it, that just makes the consumer want to walk away when they cant afford the home. Then the bank if stuck with a home that no one is paying for. The banks are getting what they deserve and if Uncle sam bails out the mortgage companies for making bad loans then that is dumbist freaking thing they could do in my opinion. That just allows other companies to make bad choices and they get bailed out too.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
El Toro

04-11-2008 14:38:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
They should never have lowered the interest rates
since the realtors will tell a customer with the rates being so low, you can now afford a more enpensive house. They forget to tell them what the real estate taxes, heating & cooling, water and sewer bill is. I had to show copies of my 1040 for 2 years and get a statement from my employer showing how long I had been employed there and if the job was permanent or temporary.
This was for am VA loan in 1962. I didn't have to do all that on this home since I paid 1/3 down. Hal

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bill in Colo

04-11-2008 15:29:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to El Toro, 04-11-2008 14:38:35  
One of the problems was ending the deduction of credit card interest on taxes. alot of people refinaced homes to payoff credit cards so they could take the deduction. then they ran the cards up again.
Quite a few of us know what it was like to farm on 18% money and those it didn't go broke got a heck of an education. My college farm management and econ sure didn't prepare me for what was to come.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
big fred

04-11-2008 14:15:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
The current financial (mortgage) problems are a result of the "Community Reinvestment Act of 1977" which mandated that lenders issue more mortgages to high risk borrowers. The CRA was amended in 1995 to make things even worse, then again in 2005. The government, thru it's social engineering attempts, created the problem, I don't see why anyone should believe they can fix it thru even more idiotic policy.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Gun guru

04-12-2008 04:55:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to riverbend, 04-11-2008 19:25:30  
What I meant was the regulation that banks (Have) to loan money to inner city folks that really cant afford the loans anyway, it is called affirmative action I think. I do agree that both political parties have their downfalls when it comes to bank regulation, mortgage loans etc.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Spook

04-11-2008 14:55:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to big fred, 04-11-2008 14:15:00  
The mortgages going bad in places like Michigan are not inner city stuff. Mostly around here it is people losing jobs and/or income. The thing I see is that the average home is too expensive for the average income. This was masked for years by people doing "financial engineering" with home equity loans. The use of credit went up, which kept the economy going, but sooner or later ya gotta pay the piper.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Farmallsc

04-11-2008 14:07:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
The issue is that banks lowered lending standards so much that loans where given to people who simply had no hope of paying them back. Additionally appreciated housing prices caused increased "wealth". people who boy a house for 40,000 dollars twenty years ago now had the same house reflected on their assets at 250,000. Except that you cant spend your living room. So loans where given on the assumption that you had 250,000 dollars of collateral. when the housing market fell through people with adjustable rate mortgages defaulted on their loans since they owed more on their house then it was worth. If the bank was to repossess the property they still couldn't recoup the loss since market value on the house was now so low. Anyway the quick answer is readjust lending standards and give the federal reserve more influence over loan criteria. It will take sometime to reverse the damage done.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steven f/AZ

04-11-2008 13:40:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
The people who sunk themselves should suffer!

My wife and I have jobs, built a modest home, and can afford our mortgage payment and everything else we need to survive.

People who were stupid enough to purchase a home they cannot afford should suffer for their stupidity! Why is it that the government always steps in to help out the people who made stupid choices?

Those of us who have been cautious and actually thought through our decisions before commiting are the ones who will suffer and have our tax dollars spent to bail out the idiots.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Spook

04-11-2008 15:00:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Steven f/AZ, 04-11-2008 13:40:36  
I don't see that the government is helping the homeowners. It is bailing out banks and wall street. That is sort of my point - not that people should be bailed out because they bought a McMansion, but we need to create real jobs here, like improving our infrastructure, the bridges and roads that are falling apart, rather than bail out investment bankers.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kelly C

04-11-2008 17:37:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 15:00:12  
I agree in theory with what you said. but the reality is we cant let the banks fail. Even if they should from being greedy and stupid.
Mass bank failures would really mess things up.
Another great depression or some thing simular.

If that happened then the talk about jobs and health care would be moot.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
M Moline Fan

04-11-2008 15:43:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 15:00:12  
"We need to create real jobs here"-- we HAD good jobs and gave them away & gave away the store. I doubt we'll get them back. When NAFTA was being touted I tried calling in to Rush Limbaugh's program and couldn't get through- he was for it. He wouldn't discuss it anyhow. He knew he was right. He said "let them make typewriters, we'll build computers". Wrong! As Jeremiah Wright said "the chickens are coming home to roost".

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
How did NAFTA give

04-11-2008 17:04:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to M Moline Fan, 04-11-2008 15:43:15  
away all our good jobs? please explain that to me cause I have read the NAFTA agreement front to back.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
M Moline Fan

04-11-2008 17:37:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to How did NAFTA give, 04-11-2008 17:04:32  
I just googled NAFTA and checked in the first block, Wikipedia. There's endless commentaries to read. In this block I read that net manufacturing employment declined by 3,654,000 between 1994 (when it was implemented) and 2007 in the U.S. I've heard estimates that Ohio (where I live) lost a quarter million manufacturing jobs in that time.

How? Because countries like China don't have restrictions that our domestic industries do- like pollution or worker safety. Doesn't the Chinese govn't subsidize their industries- such as with the value of their currency? (this may be changing with our cheap dollar) Their industries don't have to pay for workers' health insurance and wages are dirt cheap. Here we have a host of infrastructure (property taxes and countless others) to support. How can we compete? What do they buy from us? (only raw materials to make more things to sell us) The end result with China alone is we have a trade deficit with them around $1 trillion.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
NAFTA has nothing to

04-12-2008 04:47:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to M Moline Fan, 04-11-2008 17:37:53  
with jobs going to china. Nafta stands for NORTH AMERICA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT..... . which is the US, Canada, and Mexico.

cant blame jobs going over seas on NAFTA...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kelly C

04-11-2008 17:57:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to M Moline Fan, 04-11-2008 17:37:53  
NAFTA. In the long run will be good for every one. I know its hard to see that right now as we are still adjusting to the new way the world works.
Eventually it will balance out. In actuallity it already has. GPD and wealth in the US is at a all time high.
Unemployment is realitively low. less than 5%.

Although some areas have suffered more than others.

There is no way that the US could keep going like it did when after WW2 we were the only country that was still in working condition.
That gave us an unfair advantage. And we took advantage of that.

Now though all the other industrialized countries are catching up or have surpassed us.
Putting our heads in the sand and wishing the world would not change is not a solution.

Fact of the matter is. Unskilled High school drop outs can no longer. Quit school and get a factory job that pays well over what it should.

I know its cruddy but we are going to have to buckle down and earn it.

Hey they have a real shortage of CNC operators around here. Welders too all the skilled trades are in short supply.
just think what its going to be like job wise when all the babby boomers retire? Who is going to fill the millions of jobs left vacant?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
M Moline Fan

04-11-2008 18:48:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Kelly C, 04-11-2008 17:57:30  
"just going to have to buckle down and earn it". Reminds me, last evening I was watching the Glenn Beck show on CNN. He had a guest who talked about the cost pressures on airlines. Then he said some airline (co)-pilots start as low as $20,000 a year. Glenn Beck almost fell off his chair- "you mean to tell me there can be a pilot behind the door of the plane I'm on that's only being paid a $20,000 salary?" The guest said "that's right".

That also reminds me, listening to Beck on the radio, one day being informal, he messed up a commercial he was reading. He joked "there goes $10,000". No doubt that's his fee for doing a commercial. Things are way out of wack.

And- for young guys starting out around here, there's few opportunities. You mentioned being a CNC operator. I began life farming, then schooled as a tool and die maker and gave up farming. The factory where I trained is empty and rusting away, as is the Chrysler factory where I worked the majority of years. The factories that are left in this area pressure workers to work for less than a living wage- ala Mexico, or they'll close. They do eventually anyhow.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kelly C

04-12-2008 11:44:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to M Moline Fan, 04-11-2008 18:48:55  
I would Imagine there are not too many $20,000 pilots out there. If there are they are just getting in or trying to stay in.

Same goes for $15 hr CNC guys. Some will take that job to gain experince. Then leave when they find better. Some lost good jobs and take till they find better.
Then there are the $15 hr guys that are there because their drinking/ drugs gets them fired from the better places. they will be there forever.

If your good at what you do and work hard at it. You can be gainfully Employed for a good wage.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steven f/AZ

04-12-2008 14:46:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Kelly C, 04-12-2008 11:44:02  

Kelly C said: (quoted from post at 11:44:02 04/12/08)If your good at what you do and work hard at it. You can be gainfully Employed for a good wage.


That's right! There are still good jobs out there for people with a good work ethic and sense of morals. Sometimes you have to be willing to move, too. Like my wife and I from ND to AZ, now we make double what we could be making in ND - and the cost of living is probably only 10% more. :D

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kelly C

04-12-2008 21:54:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Steven f/AZ, 04-12-2008 14:46:28  
Steve it is hard for alot of people. I understand that. Alot of people grew up with a goal to work for a certain company.
I.E.
When I get out of school I am going to work for Maytag, Ford, IBM, 3M, RCA, International Harvester,The steel mill, ect ect.
That works well as long as there is a garantee that all these companies will stay stable and consistant. After ww2 up till the 80's worked great.
So most peoples self worth came from who they worked for, not what they could do.

With the way companies and economies work now.That just wont work any more. You cant count on staying at Ford for 30 years. Things are likely to change after 5 years. So you need to be prepaired.

Now its about skill sets. Decide what type of work you like and develope a skill set to market your self in that field. Then keep ontop of the skills so when things change you are prepaired.
That way you are defined by what you can do. Not by who you do it for.

My self for example. I like working with my hands, Working out side, Like to drive, also like computers.
My skill set includes: Sales, Supervisory,Military, telicomunications,Net working, Computer repair, Under ground cable locating, Human resources,Delivery, Damage investigation and resolution, Web Design, Plus I keep a Class A CDL just incase.

Moral: If your on top of your skills the who you work for takes care of it self.

Right now I work for the Phone company, Driving around, Instaling phone lines, Instaling DSL and doing home and bussiness net working. All the stuff I like.

When and if I get laid off. Possable because these places are run by Idiots.
After being disapointed because I like this job.
I would have another job in about 3 days. Then another really good job in about 3 mos.
And thats not dependant on who the president is. Who runs what oil company.What social program is in the news. Or any one else for that matter.

It will be because I have planed for that event in advance.

Its also nice not caring what your crazy boss does. If your on top of your skills. They have no power over you. You hold the cards not them. You dont have to work for a jerk.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
26Red

04-11-2008 14:41:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Steven f/AZ, 04-11-2008 13:40:36  
I agree. But I don't think those predatory lenders and banks should get off that easy with a bail out. Everbody new the housing market was going to bust sooner than later.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Traditional Farmer

04-11-2008 14:13:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Steven f/AZ, 04-11-2008 13:40:36  
Yep! In our system Stupidity has to carry a penalty for it to work.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bret4207

04-11-2008 13:35:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
Health care? As in gov"t run/mandated health care? Good idea. You think we"re in a financial mess now just wait until there"s "free" health care. No way, no how will it ever work.

BTW- If we can"t afford "the war", how in the world will be able to afford a program 5-10 times the size of "the war"?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dddd

04-11-2008 13:30:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
aren't the problems of today similar to the bait and switch of the old days that people went to jail for? Instead the government wants to sweep it under the rug by "fixing" it. Why don't we just start over with a new govenment and let our old representatives join the ranks of the unemployed and see how they like it. I saw the other day where a couple that made 30,000 combined income qualified for a 350,000 home. Really, why should we pay to fix their problem. Jail the banker and let them out of the loan. If you can't afford the dance don't go!!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Verniee

04-11-2008 13:16:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Spook, 04-11-2008 13:12:21  
I do have a decent job and healthcare. I can afford my mortgage and debt.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JimPeoria

04-11-2008 16:16:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Verniee, 04-11-2008 13:16:18  
If you really want single payer health care then get the government and the insurance companies out of the way and let the consumer pay for their own care. Once the red tape is out of the way health care costs will drop like a stone and we can afford it. I am a 100% disabled veteran and use the VA's health care system and believe me there is nothing fun or good about how it works. I am forced to drive 65 miles and 2 hours to get anything done and usually have to make several trips at that. I could drive 4 miles to my local MD and only need one trip to get done the same thing that takes the VA 3 visits to do. I can't even go to the ER without authration and if I do then I sometimes end up paying for it out of my pocket. The care I have gotten is second rate at best which is exactly what this type of system will garuntee because there is no system in place to weed out the poor preforming doctors and support staff. We need to get the insurance companies and their pack of blood sucking lawyers and the government out of the health care industry all together. If you want insurance then you make a deal with the insurance company and after the procedure is done you submit the bill to the insurance company and they reimburse you. That way you are dealing directly with the doctors and hospitals and cutting all the red tape out of the way so they can charge less. Jim

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Brian Jasper co. Ia

04-11-2008 17:58:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to JimPeoria, 04-11-2008 16:16:13  
NAFTA gave away good jobs because in Mexico a job there that pays $5 an hour is equal to something that pays $25 in the U.S. Why would you pay $25 per hour for labor when you can get it for $5 per hour, spend the equivalent of $10 per hour for transportation and sell for the same price if it were made here in the U.S.? GM does this producing vehicles in Mexico now. Look on the door of your new Tahoe or Suburban. I've seen several that say made in Mexico. Another way to get cheap China junk into this country is ship it to Mexico where they welcome it duty free, then ship it duty free under NAFTA to the U.S.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
krm

04-12-2008 15:25:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Brian Jasper co. Ia, 04-11-2008 17:58:09  
Now everyone else is hearing that great sucking sound Ross Perot talked about several years ago.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
LenND

04-11-2008 18:33:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to Brian Jasper co. Ia, 04-11-2008 17:58:09  
Hey! GM isn't the only one.All the full size Fords and Mercuries have been made in Mexico for years and years and still are. Most Chevy pickups and Camaros have been made in Canada for quite a few years. Ford pickups have had Mazda made trannies for years.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Vern-MI

04-12-2008 04:32:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - Economics in reply to LenND, 04-11-2008 18:33:54  
Full sized Ford's and Merc's are made in Oakville Ontario, Canada which is not exactly a cheap labor market.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy