Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

battery polarity

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
SKane

02-13-2006 04:06:28




Report to Moderator

I"d like to know what determines the polarity grounding of a battery. Why is one system negative ground and another positive ground?

The specific tractor is an Oliver 550. The operators manual states that it is to be positive ground. Mine is negative ground and it works fine. It has a generator (not alternator) and the only difference I see from stock is that it has a different voltage regulator.

On a system such as this, what determines the polarity and theoretically would it matter if it is negative or postive ground?

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Gary Schafer

02-13-2006 08:01:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to SKane, 02-13-2006 04:06:28  
Which polarity probably doesn’t make too much difference. If you have a generator it needs to be polarized the way you have the battery. The regulator will probably have to be polarized too or it may not work.

As to the flow of electrons is concerned, they do go from negative to positive. The hole theory as someone mentioned has to do with semiconductor material IE transistors. The newer theory being taught now is that ENERGY flows from positive to negative. That is how most newer engineers will look at the situation. Nothing has changed as electrons still move from positive to negative. It is all to do with how one views the problem. It is often easier to view the energy flow from positive to negative in a circuit.

By the way electrons don’t move through material at a very high speed, they are actually pretty slow moving. The energy itself does move near the speed of light. Most people think the electrons move at the speed of light but they do not. They bump into other electrons in the material and cause those to move and so on. You may remember the demonstration of six or eight solid balls hanging from strings and each ball touching one another. Striking the first ball does not cause all to move but only the last one in line. That is similar to what happens with electricity in a wire.

It does make some difference in the ignition system as to how polarity is set up. The spark from the coil should be negative in polarity as it will arc slightly easier if it is. So the coil connection should be observed at its primary.

As far as points arcing and building up deposits, that is a function of the condenser across them. Too much capacitance and the metal (buildup) will move to one side. Too little capacitance and the metal will move to the other side.

As far as any galvanic corrosion and polarity is concerned, that would depend on the type of metal on each side of a joint.

Regards
Gary

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RAB

02-13-2006 09:09:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to Gary Schafer, 02-13-2006 08:01:05  
Gary, I would disagree when you said:

As far as points arcing and building up deposits, that is a function of the condenser across them. Too much capacitance and the metal (buildup) will move to one side. Too little capacitance and the metal will move to the other side.

I would say - too little capacitance and sparking will be excessive and burn points rapidly (metal transfer). Too much capacitance and the system will not work properly due to the primary coil magnetic flux collapsing too slowly, thus reducing the magnitude of the induced voltage in the secodary HT winding. With reduced sparking (eventually to zero?) of course. So size of capacitor is a compromise, really.
Regards, RAB
Regards, RAB

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

02-13-2006 13:39:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to RAB, 02-13-2006 09:09:45  
RAB and Gary, I simply love this sparky chat so gotta jump in here. Heres how I would sumamrize the condensor size thing, which agrees with what you say basically.

Tooooo much capacitance, a weaker spark, and if its too much, no spark at all. It has to do with that di/dt business and the capacitive and inductive time constant stuff. An oscillograph trace would show the inductive capacitive ringing that occurs right after the points break open which eventually dampens out.

Correct amount of capacitance, maximum spark PLUS fairly good point life, the compromises and trade offs RAB spoke of.

Tooooo little or NO capacitance, rapid point burn up PLUS a weaker spark.

As far as the deposit build up, I could swear the artice I read showed more build up at one polarity then the other, but I fail to understand that and would think it would only matter as to which contact it happened on. Electrons have a mass and when current arc jumps across the points gap, it looks like build ups would occur on the side its jumping to leaving pits/voids on the other side???? Darned if I know I gotta dust off my olddddd dd textbooks if this keeps up lol

John T, a retired sparky

Aint lectricity funnnnn nnnnn n

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Gary Schafer

02-13-2006 17:06:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to John T, 02-13-2006 13:39:23  
Hi John,

Yes it is interesting! In the operation of making a spark the ringing that occurs is just a by product and not a necessary ingredient for the spark plug to fire. Only a voltage transition in one direction at a rapid rate causes the plug to fire.

When the points open an arc occurs between the contacts as they open. An arc once started presents a low resistance across the points as long as the arc is there and sustains the arc. Actually a small plasma trail is formed in the arc which has a lower resistance than air. When switching, DC arcs are hard to put out without changing the polarity of the voltage or widening the gap of the switch (points).

Switching AC is much easier as it is constantly changing polarity and the change in polarity, voltage swinging down through zero volts, extinguishes the arc. That is the reason that you will see different ratings on a switch that may have both AC and DC current ratings. The AC rating will be much higher than the DC rating.

With a DC arc metal gets transferred from one side to the other of the contacts when the contacts open. I believe what happens to transfer metal back to the other side of the points is when the charged capacitor gets shorted by the points closing and releasing its energy which causes the points to arc again. This arc has a polarity opposite of when the points open so metal transfers to the opposite contact.

If the capacitor is of the proper size the same amount of material will transfer in one direction with points opening as the amount of material transferring in the opposite direction when the points close. The net result is no pitting or buildup of material on either side.

But since nothing is perfect there is always erosion of the point surfaces. During the arc some molten material does not transfer but gets boiled or thrown of the contact surface and lost.

If one looks at the points after some time in use usually one side or the other will have a spike (built up material) and the other side will have a matching pit from which the spike material came from. If new points and capacitor are installed and inspected some time again later it may be found that the pit may be on the opposite side of the points that it was on the last time. The capacitor may have gone from too small to too large.

With contacts switching an AC voltage the contacts last much longer as the random switching of the AC voltage results in sometimes one contact being positive and at other times the other contact being positive so the metal transfer kind of equals out and you usually only see small pits on each contact from lost metal that has gotten thrown clear during the arc times. Otherwise the metal is transferred back and forth between contacts depending on the polarity of the voltage at switch time.

There of course methods to limit the amount of arc in AC switching too, which is done on higher power circuits.
There other methods to limit arcs in DC switches also in addition to just the capacitor.

Regards
Gary

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

02-13-2006 08:09:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to Gary Schafer, 02-13-2006 08:01:05  
Good info Gary, I come from an electrical engineering background but Im pretty rustyyyyy y. If I ever get time I may research all this for myself once n for all. Its back longgggg g ago when I studied "Electronics of Solids" and all that quantum theory stuff, but in the late sixties at Purdue we still studied vacuum tubes ya know n used slide rules lol.

Electrons are negative charged particles that have mass and I understand sort of?? how they move n why its not the speed of light, thats over the heads of most this old tractor work fer sure lol

Take care, John T (long retired EE)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

02-13-2006 06:25:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to SKane, 02-13-2006 04:06:28  
SK, Through the years I have read articles etc and also heard some antecdotal evidence about the merits of Positive or Negative grounding. Unfortunately, I didnt save any of the articles so am running on memory here which aint getting any better as I age lol.

Before there was an established standard, Ford and I believe Chrysler and many tractor vendors used Positive ground. The reasons if I recall from articles were there was less galvanic corrosion between joined metallic frame members when the battery Poisitive was tied to frame ground,,,,, ,,,,,the points pitted less and didnt build up such high deposits (I know I read an article on that, wish I had saved it) ,,,,, ,,and theres the thing about its easier to emit electrons from a relatively hotter electrode to a relatively cooler ground strap on the spark plugs, not sure what polarity that would favor, however, and coil configuration also affects that.

Later the industry standard became Negative grounding and solid state devices are polarity sensitive so now almost all is at Negative ground.

NO WARRANTY on any of this I may have to research the question someday, no time now.

John T (Long retired and rusty electrical engineer)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

02-13-2006 05:37:59




Report to Moderator
 Two theories - Electron and Hole in reply to SKane, 02-13-2006 04:06:28  
Generally speaking, neither system is better- or worse - than the other. There are two competing theories about the flow of electricity, each the opposite of the other - i.e. The Electron Theory (negative to positive flow) and the Hole Theory (positive to negative flow). The Hole Theory has sort of taken a back seat when influencing everyday circuitry. Fifty years ago, they both had equal merit, so adherance to one theory led to building systems with postive ground, and belief in the other led to systems with negative ground. When the use of transistors and other related semi-conductors became popular, a standard had to be developed, and the standard in most cases is the Electron Theory. Thus the negative-ground standard. There has been a lot of testing over the years, especially with corrosion control, and in some cases, it has been proven that positive ground works better than negative. And of course, the converse is also true. None of these theories have been completely proven or disproven, and they are constantly being added to. The Hole Theory by some guy named Dirac, is often referred to now as the Conventional Theory. And, the newer Quantum Field Theory is pretty close to it. Our tractors don't give a d*mn.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
txgrn

02-14-2006 08:16:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: Two theories - Electron and Hole in reply to jdemaris, 02-13-2006 05:37:59  
Hi again jd.

As a tech and engineer I found that as a tech, troubleshooting was easier chasing the electron.

As a designer, I found that it was easier sourcing holes from the + terminal of the power supply and delivering them where needed.

So I use both; just tell me which one you want to talk about when conversing. Grin.

On engines, there is reasoning at the ignition points and spark plug terminals for which way the molecules are a running. Don't remember which way was the least damaging to the parts.....i.e. + or - grounded electrical system.

Mark

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Larry White

02-13-2006 04:21:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to SKane, 02-13-2006 04:06:28  
I am anxious to hear replies to your posting. I am wrapping up restoration of a Model V Avery which, according to the owners manual is supposed to be negative ground. I had to build all the wiring from scratch with no directions (no owners manual at the time) and set it up for positive ground. Everything worked fine except I was not able to get the generator to charge. I polarized it according to instructions from a retired mechanic and was able to see the generator put out current but I could not get anything to flow all the way through the voltage regulator. When I got the manual and read the wiring diagram I saw I should have set it up as positive ground so I switched the battery cables, switched the wires on the amp meter, the generator, and the coil. I polarized the generator again. I am still getting current through the generator but it does not go all the way through the regulator. I suspect I have a bad regulator and plan to buy a new one this week. I would like to know if the same regulator is used on both positive and negative ground systems.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

02-13-2006 06:14:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to Larry White, 02-13-2006 04:21:04  
Larry, some Voltage Regulators are Bi Polar and will work at either configuration,,,,, others may work at either but the contact points may not last as long if used reversed,,,,, ,,while I suspect (no warranty, just a suspicion) some??? may not work at all if reversed, theres just a lot of different types floating around out there. Also, I doubt you will find any supply shops that know the difference or can tell you what a particular VR works on. The genny will work at either onces its properly polarized.

John T

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Duner Wi

02-13-2006 07:48:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to John T, 02-13-2006 06:14:42  
,,,,others may work at either but the contact points may not last as long if used reverse.

I read this somewhere and it might be true , the material used on the contact points is not the same material on both contacts. In other words if positive Gr. the point material on one side will be the opposite if used as neg. gr. No guarantees.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

02-13-2006 08:01:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: battery polarity in reply to Duner Wi, 02-13-2006 07:48:32  
I totally agree with the NO GUARANTEES while Ive heard n read that before, Ive never really took the time to study or research it. Its hard to find detailed theory on VR design, Im runnin mostly on my theoretical background here but its usually "fairly" accurate lol.

John T



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy