Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

Why positive ground?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Rosy

11-02-2004 17:36:25




Report to Moderator

Why did most old tractors have positive gound?




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
buickanddeere

11-03-2004 20:15:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
Had to be one or the other. Was both for a while like in the dyas of choosing VHS or BETA-max. One standard was kept and negative (-) won. Makes it tougher figuring electron theory and the flow of electrons and holes however.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

11-03-2004 11:17:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
Well I think if you look at how the welding process works would explain the disavantages of a negitive ground DC current system.

Electron flow is from negitive to postive when dealing with DC current in welding resistance applications. In welding terms this is called straight polarity.

Reverse polarity is when the electrode is positive and the work piece is negitive.

With using straight polarity while welding, metal is transfered from the electrode (negitive) to the work piece (positive) (also called base metal) where alot of heat is generated on the work piece. This lets us use a cooler electrode and transfers alot of metal very fast to the work piece.

Using straight polarity works well as the work piece in this case absorbs more heat than the electrode and can handle more heat input than the electrode as the work piece has more mass than an electrode.

The same can be said of positive ground battery systems. Most of the heat will be generated in the tractor frame and not in the electrical componet. Since heat is a killer to componets of most electrical devices then a positive ground systems should last longer.

I think if you did a side by side comparrision, positive ground compnets will by far out last negitive ground componets.

Like Mark (txblu) pointed out, until the inventors of transistors changed there thinking of electron flow, the transistor could not work. In electronic semi-conductor circuits electron flow is always positive to negitive.

T_Bone

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
txblu

11-04-2004 06:11:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to T_Bone, 11-03-2004 11:17:57  
T Bone, you're great dude; really like the welding paradym as that is what it was all about. And yes I agree about the longer life as a result of the pos ground even though in those circuits, the current was twice what it is in the neg ground 12v circuits.

Thanks for the recognition, but I need to rearrange one comment. Having been educated in both electron flow electronics and hole flow electronics, I can see the reasoning for each.

In troubleshooting circuits, electron flow is the easiest to understand; like the Armed Services teaches. When you start designing electronic circuits, you start with a power supply and start hanging things off it. Iffin you're going to do that, to start from the positive (+) terminal of the PS and move out into the circuit, you gotta use words that will go along with that process.

So these brilliant whizbangs decided that if we talk about what happens when an electron moves INTO the positive terminal of the power supply, having been OMITTED FROM the PS neg (-)terminal and having gone thru the electrical components, we can talk flow from the + terminal.

So if electrons are being returned to the power supply via the pos terminal, the ABSENCE of electrons (i.e. the HOLE where one just left)is going out the pos terminal in the opposite direction.

So since colleges prepare engineers, and engineers design things, engineers are taught what the HOLE is doing, rather than what the electron did and hence positive conductance.

And sir, "that's the rest of the story" (Paul Harvey).

Best,

Mark

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Red Dave

11-03-2004 06:00:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
It's just the way it was done.
There is no electrical advantage or disadvantage one way or the other. Both ways work equally well.

There are the theorys of electron flow vs current flow, but in practical application it makes no difference.

As was well put below, it's just the way the engineers did it. I think GM was one of the early ones to go negative ground and Chrysler was one of the last.

I've asked old-timers who worked on electronics of the '40's & '50's why the change? Mostly no one is sure, but it may have been that GM was negative ground and in those days GM was something like 60% of the automotive industry. Electrical accesories were becoming more common, so designers went with what the biggest force in the industry had. The rest just followed suit.
But, remember that is just a theory too.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
txblu

11-03-2004 07:53:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Red Dave, 11-03-2004 06:00:31  
Well, I do know about the Germanium transistor and the heat sink.

Part of the 12v thing was to crank the big Caddies (500 cu v8's) and other's . Think they had an 8 volt first and then went to 12.

Ask Dell,

He knows.

Mark



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
txblu....Dell(WA) knows

11-03-2004 05:48:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
Has to do with metallic migration due to electrons leaving one point and being collected on another. Positive grounds gave less wear and tear on breaking contacts, spark plug terminals.

Neg ground came about with the transistor radio (for automobiles) and 12 volts in the '50's and inparticular the Germanium transistor they used for the output device. These were PNP doped devices requiring a negative power source for the collector as it was P (+) material and needed to be reverse biased by a (-) power supply.

Since this was a 5 watt device (really large power dissipation for the early days of solid state) they wanted to make sure it was heat sunk good.

Apparently they hadn't perfected good insulators with good thermal transfer characteristics, so they decided to hard mount the transistor to the heat sink chassis. The heat sink was a large finned hootus and was attached to the radio's chassis which was attached to the dash metal, which was attached to the auto's body, then frame.

And (according to Dell.....as I recall) that folks,..... .is the rest of the story (Paul Harvey).

Mark

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RAB

11-02-2004 23:49:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
The problem of + and - goes right back to the discovery of electricity - or at least the synthesis of electrical charge and discharge devices. They did, in hind-sight, get it wrong. They decided that the current flowed from positive to ground (or negative). We now know that current (electrical flow) generally flows from negative towards positve. That was because the electron had not been discovered as a sub-atomic particle until later.
Theories that less corrosion takes place with negative earth were put forward as reason to change to a common system in the "60s. The rest of the posts are probably all correct, so unless someone looks up the archives for the minutes of the meetings which took place (in the automotive industry?) leading to the negative ground decision, we will not know why for certain.
I would think it was the adoption of the alternator which required a negative earth was the deciding factor due to lobbying by the generator manufacturers.
Regards, RAB

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mark - IN.

11-02-2004 20:59:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
It isn't just old tractors. A few years ago, some auto and truck manufaturers began using it again, and for all I know, some still do.

And in the telephone business, anything still manufactured that is DC powered still is positive ground. I don't know why. But I do know that reversing polarity from -48VDC to +48VDC for even the shortest period of time before can cut the breakers has bad results. "Hello Boss? The good news is that I'm not a heart surgeon, but the bad news is that no one in the whole town of...".

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John *.?-!.* cub owner

11-03-2004 17:02:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Mark - IN., 11-02-2004 20:59:49  
Mark, the reason telephone equipment is still positive ground is that due to the interconnection of all the phone offices (even ones connected on fiber) and they way they use earth ground as part of the signalling, all of them would have to be converted at exactly the same time. No small feat.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
msb

11-02-2004 20:47:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
Has to do with the scientific world not knowing for sure if its the right hand rule of thumb the way electricity flows in a direct current coil or the left hand rule of thumb being the correct way it travels.Make a fist with each hand and point your thumbs up in the air and look how the current would have to flow through your hand to exit through your thumbs.They used to believe it was one way(positive ground) and later changed their mind(to negative ground) on the subject.Don't ask me which is correct.I have no idea.All I know is it works both ways.LOL,bob

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe Evans

11-02-2004 19:51:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
Way back when I was in tech school, on of my instructors (who worked a long time for NASA--was there in 1966 when the three astronauts died in the capsule) told us that electrons (- charge) flow to a place where there are fewer electrons (+ charge). So keeping with conventional thinking (at the time), the source for electrons is the - terminal of the battery and they flow TO ground where the + terminal of the battery is connected.

I guess it's all how you look at it.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Edchainsaw

11-04-2004 16:58:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Joe Evans, 11-02-2004 19:51:43  
Way back when I was in Engineering school I was told that it was because the old engineers thought electrons were moveing from negative to possitve.. not from Pos to neg.. and like many things it takes some engineers longer to change their product than others (hence GM's went to negative sooner and Tractors were almost last)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nebraska Cowman

11-02-2004 18:03:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  
Engineers preference



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
lucass

11-02-2004 17:46:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Rosy, 11-02-2004 17:36:25  

positive or negative ground will both work. its just another way to do it and some manufacturers did it that way untill it became the standard for everything to be the same, lcas



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ray,IN

11-02-2004 20:11:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to lucass, 11-02-2004 17:46:17  
Here's my spin on the subject. Positive ground was used because of the electron flow as already posted. This flow was thought to move metal molecules in the same direction, thus positive ground was thought to strengthen the frame by transfering molecules to it and reduce corrosion also. And to think- at one point in time I forget the year) the federal government considered closing the patent office, saying everything major that could be invented had been.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave700

11-03-2004 08:43:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Ray,IN, 11-02-2004 20:11:55  
Positive ground requires less voltage at the spark plug to fire the plug due to the very hot edge of the tip. The dielectrics for the ignition coils were not the greatest until the mid 50s. So positive ground was the norm. The transistor radios and the transistor ignition systems needed the vehicles to be negative ground due to cost of the available transistors.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
OK-AL

11-03-2004 09:30:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to Dave700, 11-03-2004 08:43:53  
Nope, the switch to negative ground wasn't because of transistors. Chevrolet changed from six-volt to 12-volt negative ground systems in model year 1955. This was long before transistor radios were available in cars and far longer than transitorized ignition systems. Chevrolet didn't start using transistorized ignition systems until some mid-1960's Corvettes.

OK-AL



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
George G

11-03-2004 16:07:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to OK-AL, 11-03-2004 09:30:30  
As far as I know. Chevrolet,Cadillac,Buick,Oldsmobile and any other G.M. was always negative ground. So was Willys. Course, I only got books that go back to 1930. Don't know what they did before that. As far as the change to 12 volts. It's cheaper to run 12 volts than it is to run 6 volts. All the wiring in the car,truck,tractor or whatever can be about half the size in a 12 volt system as compaired to a 6 volt system. If you have twice the voltage you need half the amps to run the same thing, lights,starter,exc. If you are building a few thousand cars, and each car has a couple of miles of wire in it. That's a big cost savings.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
OK-AL

11-04-2004 18:25:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: Why positive ground? in reply to George G, 11-03-2004 16:07:29  
You're probably right about GM and negative ground. My experience only goes back to about 1955.

But you're absolutely right about the cost savings by using 12 volts vs 6 volts.

OK-AL



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy