Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum

Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons)

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Jason

11-26-2001 16:01:46




Report to Moderator

I am planning to build an out building for my tractor hobby. I want a barn/workshop that is at least 24 x 32 and plan to build it myself with help from friends. I have never taken on a project this size; however, I am confident that I have the skills needed to do this. My question is which do you prefer, a pole barn or a conventionally framed structure. Which is easier to build and how do the prices compare? Thanks.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Steve

12-01-2001 01:30:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Jason, Sounds like your getting alot of good info. I'll toss in my .02 and wish ya good luck. This is going to be another one of those "Big Investments" so you want it to be ALL that you think you'll need. I built a 40x24, with 2-16' garage doors on either end so I could drive thru when needed. I poured a solid slab w/footings and beefed up the rebar a tad. Under the reinforcing wire I laid a 10 mil. sheet of visquine for a moisture barrier. Then I called in a few of my markers for the pour.(when it comes to pouring crete you can never have enough help,if your doing the pour). After that a buddy and I framed, sheathed, sided, and shingled that bad boy. Real fun standing those 40' wall's w/2 guys. I did hire a fella to upgrade the powerbox on the house and wire the garage up. I made sure I installed PLENTY of ele/outlets, 3 on each of the long walls, and 1 outside, plus a 240 outlet for serious equip. I pulled a permit, so all the work was inspected and cleared. I'll tell ya bud, it was alot of work, alot of fun, it turned out sweet, and it does the trick. I love it! So take your time, gather as much info & opinions you can stand, and get to writing your "wish list" for your refuge, and I WISH YA ALOTTA LUCK JASON! ENJOY! SJ

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Denny Frisk

11-29-2001 07:31:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
I built My 24x36 about 6-7 yrs ago. I went with a stick-type garage kit from a garage building company. The concrete floor was included in the $$$ and it was cheaper than the same sized Morton, Wick, or ? As far as time to build, a day to form the floor, poured the next day., 2 weeks later the garage went up in a day with 3 men. Even the side walls were sided when the truck showed up with them. Now all I need to do is insulate and panel the inside like I want to. I do regret not putting hot water heat in the floor, But it heats O-K for the amount of time I spend in there in the winter( a LOT!)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

11-29-2001 00:10:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
How about the steel buildings with no real frame, just the arched metal siding? Probablty not a good choice for a shop, but for the storage part?

--->Paul



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Gator

11-28-2001 20:11:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Pole bldgs. go up faster and you can specify the pole spacings to ease interior finishing with 4x8 sheeting. Depending on your location, consider plastic(Walbro, etc.) piping for heat in the floor. Also I put 1" styrofoam sheets under the concrete to help save heat and the floor doesn't sweat in the summer. Good luck, Gator.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John Ne.

11-28-2001 17:39:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Jason, Before you spend your cash on a building kit or big load of lumber, checkout your zoning codes, and building codes in your locality. Hate to have you buy something they won't let you construct. May just need a simple building permit. Also hope you live out in the wide open and none of the above applies. John in Nebr.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Roger Van Houten

11-28-2001 08:14:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
My situation is not exactly like yours but I contracted Morton for a 42x80 at the same time I was having a new house built. I told Morton I wanted to segregate 24' for a workshop but was concerned about drywalling and the ceiling in particular. I believe the trusses were to be on 7'6" center like the pole centers (maybe I'm wrong as it's been three years). The local salesman was to have their engineering dept. come up with a solution. That never happened. I cancelled when the contractor for the house priced the 42x80 conventional for within a thousand dollars. Now I have studs on 16" centers and trusses on 24" centers which made drywalling easy. Also, I have footers with concrete block (filled with Zonolite). Both would have shingle roofs, but the pole barn would have had steel siding whereas I have 4" vinyl over OSB. It only took two people to raise a section of wall at a time. I realize this may not be parallel to your case. Morton cost more than most other pole barns so you can probably build a pole barn cheaper than stick built. The only consideration is how you want to insulate/wall your shop area and possibly the footer vs. pole longevity in the ground. Roger

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
hank schade

11-27-2001 23:22:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
if you build a polebarn with a metal roof
be sure to have the roof insulated or a
large amount of condensation will form
inside the barn.ther is a special insulation
board for the purpose.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Greg

11-27-2001 21:57:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
�I am planning to build an out building for my tractor hobby. I want a barn/workshop that is at least 24 x 32 and plan to build it myself with help from friends. I have never taken on a project this size; however, I am confident that I have the skills needed to do this. My question is which do you prefer, a pole barn or a conventionally framed structure. Which is easier to build and how do the prices compare? Thanks�

With the fire danger present in a barn/shop combination I would recommend building these as two separate buildings. As to wall height, I would look at 18�-20� for a loft or second floor room/storage. An 18� wall with a 4/12 pitch roof you will be able to extend out 24� and still have a 10� wall height.

I lean to the pole type for a barn and the stick built for the shop. I would make up a bill of materials list for both types and compare/weigh the pro�s and con�s. I don�t think you�ll find enough difference to go with a pole building on a shop.

A couple things for thought, Is to pour a 4� stem wall as this will [frost line for your location?] give you 2� above grade, which will shorten the lumber in the wall for length by 2�. Snow will side just as quick on a 3/12 pitch steel roof as a 4/12. One does not have to tip long walls up at once it only takes an extra board to build them in shorter sections [12/16�]. Another option [strength/looks] is to screw the metal roofing horizontal instead of vertical on the walls.


Be sure to factor/engineer the snow, wind loads in for your location.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kevin

11-27-2001 18:21:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Well, seeing how no one else will stick up for conventional, I will. Me and the wife built a 24 x 48 x 10' high garage last year. No other help at all. Hauled all the materials in my Dodge Maxivan as needed each weekend. Used the old way of building rafters with a center beam, a truss truck or any other large rig won't make the turn in the driveway. Two garage doors, a service door,couple cheap windows, standard shingle roof. Don't know exactly how much it cost though, but because I bought as needed all summer, just paid cash as I went. I was sold on concrete floor from day one though because its wet about nine months of the year around here. Good Luck!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

11-28-2001 23:53:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Kevin, 11-27-2001 18:21:11  
> a truss truck or any other large rig won't make the turn in the driveway.

Have you considered what happens if you have a fire? Firetucks are pretty big these days. Might want to consider improving the driveway.

Yea, totally off the topic, and none of my business, but something you may want to think about. :)

--->Paul



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kevin

11-29-2001 17:43:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to paul, 11-28-2001 23:53:42  
Its insured for waaaayy more than I have in it! :-)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
kb

11-27-2001 17:39:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
My Dad and I built my 24X32 building last June. It cost me right at $3000. I used post and beam type construction, which was much cheaper than going with conventional stick framing with 2X studs.

I used Oak 6X6 posts, poured a footer for each and pinned them with rebar. I have Oak 2X6s about 10 inches above the floor, at the top and another in the middle. I also braced the corners using oak 2X6s, as well. I used trusses for the roof, on a four foot center, the local Wolihans, 84 Lumber and Lowe's also use a four foot center. I then used 2X4 crosspieces on a 2 foot center to attach the metal roofing to the trusses. I also sheeted the rest of the bulding with the same painted metal, which makes it look pretty sharp.

I installed a prehung exterior door for easy access, along with a standard garage door.

I poured the concrete floor in two pours of 16' X 24'.

The only thing that my Dad and I didn't do alone was pouring the floor, when my nephew helped out, and setting the trusses, in which two of my nephews helped out.

I live in Eastern Kentucky, so that definitely helped some of the pricing. Oak lumber costs about $300 a thousand board feet here. The snow load in the winter is light enough so that the 4' on center trusses will easily hold the weight. The metal manufacturer recommends cross pieces on a 3' center at max, so my 2' on center was well within the metal's specs.

The only thing I would do differently if I had to do it over again would be to pour the floor first, but at the time I wasn't sure if I would have enough cash for the concrete floor.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Johnbob

11-27-2001 16:48:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
I built a pole barn 18 years ago with cement floor,now the posts are rotting at ground level.What can I do to fix the problem?I will never build another pole building.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
kb

12-03-2001 20:23:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Johnbob, 11-27-2001 16:48:07  
When faced with a similar situation in older barns we have either set new posts next to the old ones, or cut off the old post and spliced in new material. Whichever way you do it you need to make sure that the building is properly temporarily supported and the new material is properly braced.

I've seen a lot of 65+ year old barns with posts set on rocks here in Eastern Kentucky, the posts stay pretty solid as long as you keep them dry.

When I built mine I poured concrete footings to set the posts on, and anyplace the concrete might come in contact with the wood I pretreated with some roof cement, to help repel water. The life of any building is keeping the water away from it using drains, guttering, downspouts, channeling water away, etc. You also need to keep insects (powder post beetles, carpenter ants, termites, etc) away from any type of building to keep it structurally sound.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John Ne.

11-27-2001 16:36:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Good ideas,,, BUT, before you buy a load of wood, or a kit, better check with your zoning board, for ordinances, and see if any type building is disallowed. Hate to see you buy something that they wouldn't okay. May also need building permit, OR you may be living out in the wide open and none of the avoce apply. Hope so. John in Ne.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
I am sooooooo outdated-PCC-AL

11-27-2001 07:02:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
When I saw this post I thought, boy, here is something I know something about. I'm not even in the same class with you guys.
My dad and I built our pole-barn about 30 years ago to replace the old wood-shed that was made of rough lumber cut on the place. It is about 30 feet wide and 60 feet long by 16 feet high in the middle. It is made almost entirely of red cedar poles using the old rough lumber on top to nail the old tin to. We saved the unrusted tin from the old shed and scrapped up a little extra as needed. Total cost; approx. $2.00 for chain saw gas, $25.00 nails and a little sweat. Floor is good old mother earth and the 8N is parked under the barn. It may stand another 30 yrs. if the dog-gone woodpeckers will leave the bees in the cedar alone.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ken

11-27-2001 18:26:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to I am sooooooo outdated-PCC-AL, 11-27-2001 07:02:43  
My Hero! I've got the gravel in place, the 30 or 40 cedars in a pile and the Oliver 55 ready to lift next spring! I will have to buy new tin though.
As for life expectancy, the dang carpenter ants will probably do it in after about 20 or so years!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
BB

11-27-2001 04:50:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
As far as ease of construction, consider a pre-fab steel building. I put up a 30'x40' building last year. I had a contractor pour the slab. I had help putting up the steel trusses for the frame and the long roof panels. Almost all the rest, I did by myself. Mine is a Mueller Steel Building. I sat down with the salesman and told him what I wanted, 30'x40', 10' side walls, 4/12 pitch roof, 2-10'x10' doors, 1 walk-in door, overhanging eaves, gutters, insulated. It came in kit form, bolt together. I did have to cut the end wall panels to match the roof slope.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MarkB

11-27-2001 03:14:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Jason, I haven't built my shop yet, but I've experimented with some smaller buildings, and I've decided to go post frame. Here's why:

1. One or two guys can do most of the work, pretty much everything but hanging the trusses. This is the main consideration because I intend to do most of the work myself. (It's tough to erect long walls on conventional without a crew.)

2. It's easy to beef up the building, if need be. Just make the posts heavier or closer together.

3. You don't have to pour the floor first. You can do it a year later, if you run out of cash.

4. Materials may be a little cheaper, although I don't think it's much of a difference with conventional if you use T1-11 (plywood) siding and shingle roof for both.

Now there are a few disadvantages:

1. If you are going to drywall the inside, conventional will be a lot easier than post frame. Likewise, post frame is a pain to insulate.

2. You have to set the posts perfect, otherwise you will have a crooked building. If you haven't done this before, get somebody that knows what they are doing. Also, don't break out the beer until AFTER the posts are set. (Based on experience with brother-in-law's barn.)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone....Poster Suggestion!

11-26-2001 19:01:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Something posters need to consider when asking building questions is to post where they live. Had you been in Arizona I would have suggested all steel frame and siding as the heat tears wood up very well. Steel is the only choice here.

I agree that a pole frame would be best.

Some very nice building pictures guys.

T_Bone



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Glen Rusling

11-26-2001 18:16:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
Put up a machine shed last year using poles. It has 16ft walls, 54ft x 80ft clearspan. The price included tranporting materials and putting up the building. $32,000 Canadian. Had to prepare site first but that was minimal cost. Only has dirt floor. Has skylight, mandoor and 23ft x16ft sliding access doors. This is a great building for storage, but we all wish it was bigger. My friend has a building from the same manufacturer and his is over 10 years old with no problems.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RB/CT

11-27-2001 17:38:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Glen Rusling, 11-26-2001 18:16:54  
Just some added info: Someone wrote about rotted posts. A person has come up with a clever idea at I believe www.postprotector.com. It is a plastic sleeve 6x6 that the post fits into and then into the ground. It has jagged edges so that it can't heave up or down. I don't know how good it is. Yes, I know the old method of a plastic bag and 80lb of dry concrete. The only downside to a steel bldg. is if its not insulated and you heat it it will sweat. I needed some instant storage with no tax liability so this year, I purchased a brand new ground level marine container. It was quick with no permit or taxes, but the cost per square foot was high. 8' x 8' x 20, for 2700 delivered. It is built strong and tight. They can stack these eight high on ships loaded. Thats 400,000 lbs. It can easily hold two small tractors such as 8ns. Thanks.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F14

11-26-2001 17:51:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
third party image

Compacted dirt floor. 20x32 with loft, plus a 10x26 ell. Metal roof. Wood I-Beams for loft floor. $6750 for materials, another $400 for fill. I don't believe you'd do conventional framing for that.

Link is to album of construction pictures.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob in VT

11-27-2001 03:12:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to F14, 11-26-2001 17:51:48  
Paul, Is that silent floor hiding under the second story floor for joists. If it is, how do you like it and was the cost about 1&1/2 the cost of comparable dimension lumber(2x10/12)? Thanks



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F14

11-27-2001 03:28:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Bob in VT, 11-27-2001 03:12:14  
Not familiar with the term "silent floor", but the loft floor sits on 14" deep manufactured wood I-beams, which are 2x3's top and bottom with 5/8" OSB webs finger-jointed into rabbets on the 2x3's. Joists are on 16" centers sitting on doubled 2x10 pressure treated yellow pine headers that have a piece of 1/2" PT plywood sandwiched between them. Floor decking is 1-1/8 tongue and groove underlayment. Might be a bit of overkill, but my SiL has a loft of 3/4" ply over 2x10 joists on 24" centers, and it feels like a trampoline to me.

The I-beams were a bit spendy, but the ease of construction and the rigidity were major selling points. I think the cost would have come out about even by the time I bought 2x12 joists and materials for the center carrying beam and posts, plus I'd have had to try to park equipment around the posts.

The I beams were comparable in cost to chord trusses (maybe a bit cheaper), lighter, and easier to work with.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Red Dave

11-26-2001 17:42:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
I built a 24X32 pole barn about 5 years ago. Concrete floor, electrical service, plumbing, insulated, phone and cable TV too. Conventional doors & windows, standard overhead garage door. I don't know why anybody would think you need conventional framing for doors & windows. Makes a great shop, just wish it was twice the size.
Conventional framing is nicer, but a pole barn is a LOT cheaper and less complicated to build.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Irv

11-26-2001 17:08:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  
I would go with a pole barn. I would say that the matierals will be About 25% less, but the labor is much less. I built a 40x40 pole barn, and later added electric and water. This year, I hope a concrete floor. Whatever you decide, larger is better. I wish I had more room now! Good luck.

Irv



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buck

11-26-2001 16:44:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to Jason, 11-26-2001 16:01:46  

I would let the type of floor be the deciding factor. earth/gravel floor use pole barn. concrete floor with conventional doors and windows use conventional framing.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RB/CT

11-26-2001 18:20:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Pole Barn vs. Conventional Framing (Need Pros and Cons) in reply to buck, 11-26-2001 16:44:53  
Buck: The following three web sites might be of interest to you. I enjoyed them. www.mortonbuildings.com, www.pionrpole.qpg.com,andwww.conestogabuildings.com. Good luck.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy