|
I was assuming that by replacing the evaporator (low pressure side) of the system with another condensing unit (pump, condensor, and fan), the condensing unit would actually add an element of safety to the system. The rest of the "knowledge" has been designed in by the engineers. My assumption is that one would not need a reversing valve since the reversal of refrigerant flow would be done by managing the power to the respective pump, and existing fans. The only issue that I see is that when the refrigerant passes through the "evaporator" side, the refrigerant will be a liquid, flowing through the pump check valve, through the cylinder cavity, and back through the condensor heat exchanger. This liquid can not get into the pump, or the pump will be ruined. If both condenser units draw from the top of the heat exchanger, the liquid should set in the bottom of the heat exchanger, and go to vapor by using the fan to disipate energy. Rethinking this, I dont think a expansion valve is possible in the system since the flow will be reversed using the pumps. The system would have to run using the check valve of the non running compressor as the expansion valve. Expansion valves usually work on temperature, or mechanical orafice sizing, so I think the check valve should suffice for this. The major issue would be to make sure there is no liquid in the compressor that is being started. Maybe this could be done by running one or both fans until the refrigerant is at equilibrum, and the liquid is in the respective heat exchanger. Additionally, some of these units have a block heater that could be turned on to heat the compressor, which would boil out the liquid form the cylinder head.
|