|
Hi Joe, I agree with what both Rob and JML said on the matter. I've also noticed that on the broad front, obsolescence is quickened by both technology and fashion. Consumers have been successfully conditioned to mindlessly prefer new to good, including the absurd but common feeling that ownership of the latest version of all the "must have" disposable consumer goods is a sign of personal merit. If you choose to keep something because it works well and does everything you need, you will soon find yourself very isolated. Most people will consider you eccentric, at best, and you will find it increasingly difficult to obtain technical support or replacement parts and supplies. Then, once you're forced to abandon your perfectly good product (WordPerfect, or a typewriter, or a VCR, or an answering machine) you will face a daunting learning curve as part of your penalty for refusing to stay bunched up with the herd. Frequently now, however, you really don't get a choice to stick with the old technology. What are you going to watch on your non-HD TV when only HD programming is available? The recorded message advising people without touch-tone phones to stay on the line for an operator is pretty much a thing of the past, for obvious reasons. But what is also becoming a thing of the past is the attitude that such concessions are even necessary. If you can't keep up, or choose not to (probably especially if you choose not to) then you're just SOL. Who wants to deal with a non-conformist anyway? You'll probably just insist on talking to a person instead of transacting your business through a series of never-quite-right menus, and then you'll want to pay with a check instead of a debit card. What's that, you don't have a a debit card? You don't believe in them? It's just a shame that we don't have laws outlawing your type (yet.) Here's an unexpected consequence of living in this brave new world where new is better than good: nobody wants the stuff you've got. There's a diminsishing number of people over 50 (more or less) who still recognize quality and prefer it. There's a growing number of people under 50 who do not have the capability to recognize quality, and who are forced to accept hype rather than exercise personal judgment. They like shiny things and bright colors, believe what authorities tell them, and are reassured by people who have letters behind their names and certificates of something on their walls. Only people in the first group are interested in buying the belongings (tools, recreational equipment, vehicles, even houses) of people in the first group. Since they're over 50, however, most of them already have most of the things they need. I used to think that the high quality tools I own were worth some money. Increasingly, I'm beginning to think they're more likely becoming a liability. When I die, or even when I'm just too old to use them any more, they might only be something that somebody will want to be paid to haul away. All the best, Stan
|