|
Thanks, guys. As always, a wealth of well thought out advice. I guess it's kinda like tractors, everyone has their favorite and their opinions about the ones that are bad. As a cop, I carried a 12 ga. pump and a .357 sidearm. Off duty I carried a .44 special Bulldog and a .22 boot gun. So, I'm not unfamiliar with weapons and agree with much of what's been said. One element of my thinking is that I need something that my wife can handle. So, a .45 colt or a big pump are likely out of the question. Yes, she will use a gun if need be. She's a country girl and knows her way around the real world. She can outwork, outthink and outmanuever most men, including me sometimes. Anyway, my question was rooted in the relevant shootability of the two calibers, not having used either. Now, while the conversation quickly skewed off toward one of firearm quality - and I deeply appreciate your opinions - I think there may be some misconceptions afoot. I have experienced untimely malfunctions in name brand weapons including Colt and Ruger. You haven't lived until you've had a weapon explode in your hand. On the flip side, one of the most dependable guns I've ever owned is a little, cheap Jennings .380 pocket auto I've had for years, pumped hundreds of rounds through with nary a problem. Fit and finish are not necessarily the measure of a good firearm either, witness the AK-47, one of the crudest yet most revered assault weapons ever made. The vaunted Colt M-16 was plagued with problems for years and was arguably responsible for many dead young Americans in Nam, yet has been refined to the point that it is now one of the finest choices available. The name on the piece and the finish of that piece are indicators but not determining factors in the overall effectiveness of the weapon. There are bad JDs and there are good ones, same with Fords and Oliver. I can smooth a rough piece of plastic stock, hone an action, smooth a trigger. If the machine is a reliable shooter and has a good form/function aspect with resonable stopping power (not too much power either since it is a residential op) I am interested. The carbine, as a class, seems a good fit here. Light weight, light ammo load, small size, simple and easy to operate for a woman if need be. I've read many good things about the Hi-Point carbine, especially the newer more refined ones. Has anyone read any bad reviews, not just heresay, but actual structured firing tests? I've heard many knowledgeable guys say they love theirs, claim they are accurate and reliable. My sense is that if they were priced at $400 instead of $200 they'd get more respect instead of being scoffed at as a 'cheap' gun. So, again my friends, I respect all your opinions and sage advice, I think I will see for myself. I will get the carbine, 9 mil I think, cycle a few boxes through her and let mama have a turn too. After that I will report back to you and let you know what I figure out. It'll be a fun thing for all of us. And, if it doesn't stand up to my expectations I'll sell it and do something else. Besides, (don't laugh too hard now) if it doesn't work I've still got my old Jennings .380 to back it up. 880 is 10-8, off to the gun shop.
|