|
Hi Bus Driver, So what did you do? There's a certain amount of satisfaction in pointing out to a deadbeat what's wrong with his life, but not $350 a month worth. A long time ago I had to have some non-paying renters evicted from my first rental house, and more recently I got a good deal of experience with evictions at an apartment complex I worked at. Dead loss, as far as I can tell. Our legal system, particularly the civil law side, isn't set up to protect those who follow the rules from those who don't. This was hammered home for me when I learned that the quasi-legal definition of "judgement proof" is a person who has nothing to lose, nothing to give up, nothing that can be taken to settle claims against him or her. If you do have something to lose, however, you're really a prisoner to the system (See T_Bone's posting and the responses concerning property taxation abuses below for one example.) You have to play by the rules and take your lumps. You'll lose but you won't lose everything. Go outside the rules a little bit though (throw a deadbeat renter's goods out into the yard, injure an unarmed burglar in your house, grab a minor who's trying to flee after being caught vandalizing your property) and you're likely to lose everything. Why is it that we productive citizens in a country which is a democracy feel so much like the helpless subjects of a lunatic feudal system? I know that it's not as bad as it could be, but is that actually a high enough standard? How much comfort, much less pride, should we take in the fact that our country's motto today could be, "America---not the worst country ever"? Didn't we used to aspire to a higher standard than that? All the best, Stan
|