Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Tool Talk Discussion Forum

OT - But I am buiding a tool

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Terry G

09-28-2006 20:34:28




Report to Moderator

third party image

Can anyone help me with a vector force problem or point me to a forum that might give me a formula. I am building a dump bed trailer and I need to know the force required for the hydraulic cylinder to start to lift the load.

The trailer bed is 4� x 8� and will have a maximum load of 3000 lbs evenly loaded. The pivot point of the bed is at the top of triangle �C� in the drawing and is 7 feet from the front and 1 foot from the back of the trailer. A hydraulic cylinder 22.25� closed length will anchor at points �A� and �B�. The distance from point �B� to pivot point �C� is 37.29�. The distance from point �A� to pivot point �C� is 16.23�. Angle �ABC� IS 12.18 degrees. Angle �ACB� is 16.81 degrees. Angle �BAC� is 151.01 degrees. I know I could just oversize the cylinder and it would work but I would really like to have a formula to calculate it so I can play with different cylinder diameters and lengths as well as different mounting points on the trailer.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Leroy

10-04-2006 05:01:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
I am no enginere BUT I see the potential for a great problem with your design. you have the axle so far back that you will have a toung load of the 3000# and I know of NO HITCH that can carry a load like that, would lift the front of your tractor off ground if it did not bust the hitch off and then the toung would have to be so heavy to hold that much weight. Center the axle so there is not more than 300# weight on the hitch point.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ScottP

09-30-2006 12:41:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
Terry
One thing I haven't seen mentioned is; the weight of the trailer bed. Are you figuring in the weight of the bed as part of the 3000 pound load?
To support and lift a 3000 pound load the bed will have to be well buildt. With one lift cylinder you have to worry about the bed twisting during the lift. Another thing to be figured is what the load is. The angle needed to dump dirt is greater than the angle to dump shell corn.
Scott

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Terry G

09-30-2006 16:54:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to ScottP, 09-30-2006 12:41:07  
Scott, I actually just used the 3000 lb load as an example to see if someone could tell me the formula to calculate the force needed. In reality the trailer probably will never see over 1500 to 2000 lbs, but knowing me if it can be overloaded I will do it at some time. Nolan and MarkB came through with the formulas to do the calculations. I can do the geometry of the cylinder pivot points and angles but I did not know how to figure the load or the force of a cylinder at an angle. This is a great site to come to for answers.
Terry G

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

10-02-2006 10:12:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-30-2006 16:54:45  
You'll have over 2000# by the second time you fill it.

Trust me. :)

--->Paul



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Terry G

10-02-2006 14:31:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to paul, 10-02-2006 10:12:17  
Maybe by the time I get the overloaded part shoveled off I will learn my lesson.
Terry G



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Davis In SC

09-29-2006 10:29:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
When this was discussed before, there were several good ideas. One was to use 2 cylinders, outboard mounted. Also, there was mention of a scissors mechanism, also a telescoping cylinder...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Terry G

09-29-2006 09:01:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
Wow! What a great bunch of responses to my question. Thanks to everyone for the formulas and other ideas. I can now calculate different cyinders and mounting positions to find the best combination. Like ebbsspeed"s post, I was also thinking the 1 foot behind the pivot point would reduce the total load some. I would welcome other opinions and\or formulas on this.
Terry G



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nolan

09-29-2006 11:35:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-29-2006 09:01:50  
As drawn, the load between B and C is substantial. So that area has to be strong.

Two easy and effective ways to reduce the loads are to either lower point B, or move point A to the left.

Right now, your angle is so tight you'd cut the forces in half by just moving point B down 4". Try the math and see.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
oldfarmtractor

09-29-2006 06:19:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
Not a difficult problem but it will take a few steps.

Since my Physics class is asking help while I type this, I will need to attack this later.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Cliff (VA)

09-29-2006 05:01:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
I would suggest that you need to look at the problem at several angles of dump. Since the geometry is changing the loading will too. I can't see this well enough in my head to figure out at what angle max loading occurs. I can see it well enough to agree that I think the cylinder tiepoints are backwards. The way you have it set up will take a fat short cylinder versus turning it the other way which will take a longer skinnier one.

The subject that you want is Statics. You might try googling for a website. Basically you sum the forces and the moments at each point to find the loading.

HTH

Cliff (VA)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nolan

09-29-2006 04:46:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
We work as if the load is just lifting. So it's sitting on points A and C.

First we load balance. Since it's evenly distributed along the bed, we can model it as centered in the bed.

Now we measure the torque imparted around the hing, point C. This gives a torque around the hinge of 3000lbs x 3 ft = 9000 lb/ft.

Next we counter that by point A. We just work with the straight up load to counter the bed torque around the hinge. Distance is 16.23 inches, so I'll round that to 16", which is 1.3 feet. 9000 lb/ft / 1.3 = 6923 lbs straight up at point A.

Don't flip out just yet. Yes, 6923 is more than the 3000 lb load. Remember, this is an offset load. With the load sitting on just A and C, it's trying to flip over to the left. The ram is going to be pushing up the load, and countering the leverage, effectively trying to rip the hinge out of the truck. In fact, the hinge is going to see 3923 lbs of force trying to rip it upwards.

Now some trig to figure out the force on the cylinder.

The angle I'll use you give as 12.18. Sine is opposite over hypotenuse. In this case, the hyponenuse is the cylinder. Manipulate and get hyponenuse = opposite / sine angle.

Opposite is 6923 lbs. Sine of 12.18 = 0.19
Hypotenuse = 36,436 lbs (6923 / 0.19)

That's the force the cylinder's got to exert to get that load just lifting, 36, 436 lbs force.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ebbsspeed

09-29-2006 08:18:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Nolan, 09-29-2006 04:46:11  
Nolan, since some of the load is behind the pivot the load as measured in the center of the bed would be less than 3000 LBS, wouldn't it? I believe your calculations assume the pivot is at the very rear of the bed, rather than 1 foot from the rear.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nolan

09-29-2006 11:17:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to ebbsspeed, 09-29-2006 08:18:38  
It would seem that way, wouldn't it?

So lets do it that way and see what happens. We'll treat the load on the left of the hinge seperately from the load on the right.

We take the 3000 lb spread out uniformly and figure out the load per foot on the bed. 3000 lb / 8 ft = 375 lb/ft along the bed.

On the right, we've got 1 foot of bed with 375 lbs. Center that load and it's six inches to the right of hinge C, or 0.5 foot. Figure the torque. 375 lb * 0.5 ft = 187.5 lb/ft of torque, clockwise.

On the left side, we've got 375 lb/ft * 7 ft = 2625 lb. And being a 7 foot bed on the left, that load would be centered 3.5 feet to the left of the hinge pin C. Figure that torque. 2625 lb * 3.5 ft = 9187.5 lb/ft of torque, counter-clockwise.

Now add the two torques together.

9187.5 lb/ft counter-clockwise + 187.5 lb/ft clockwise = 9000 lb/ft counter-clockwise.

Remember, the addition I just did is of a counter force, so it looked like subtraction as the clockwise force is countering the counter-clockwise force, and only the difference between the two forces remains.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Terry G

09-30-2006 10:10:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Nolan, 09-29-2006 11:17:50  
Nolan, I have had to time now to read all the replies and sutdy the formulas. If I am thinking right the 1 foot of weight behind the pivot point does reduce the force needed to lift the load, but your formula takes that into account. Without the 1 foot overhang the torque around the hinge would be 9187.5 lb/ft and with the overhang it would be 9000 lb/ft. By drawing the geometry to scale with a cad program and using the formula you and MarkB gave me, I should be able to find a combination I can live with. The end result of all this is not so much getting the trailer built but learning how to do the calculations to get everything right. Thanks again.
Terry G

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

10-01-2006 07:29:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-30-2006 10:10:47  
Well guys my brain is looking at the problem from a different angle.

The 9000lb figure would actually be 15000lbs at point C. At the left end of the dump bed you would need 3000lbs of lift to move a 3000lbs load at zero resistance. So if you move in 5ft at point C then your lifting 5 x 3000 = 15000lbs at point C and not 9000lbs ?

Terry since you will being buying pre-made cylinder(s) in common Known open lengths, I would start with the dumpbed open at maximum dump degrees then run 5� off perpendicular to the frame would locate the cylinder to frame attachment (point C) then calculate the cylinder diameter size needed to over come lift force at that point.

Besure and do not forget to add the friction resistance it takes to get the load moving.

T_Bone

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MarkB_MI

09-29-2006 10:17:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to ebbsspeed, 09-29-2006 08:18:38  
Speed,

No, Nolan has it right. You have to calculate the moment generated by the load, which you do by figuring out the center of the the load and using the distance from that point to your pivot as the momemt arm. In this case, the momemt arm is 3 ft, resulting in a momement of 9000 ft-lbs.

If this seems counterintuitive, just consider the case where the pivot is directly under the center of the load. In this case, the moment arm is zero, resulting in a zero moment. Meaning that the load is balanced on the pivot, and only a small force is required to rotate the load around the pivot. A teeter-totter, if you will.

Nolan and I came up with different answers due to round-off error and because we used different values for the sine of 21 degrees. But we used exactly the same method to solve the problem: calculate moment, calculate the vertical force component, calculate the total force.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MarkB_MI

09-29-2006 04:26:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
OK, you're making me dust off my 30 year old statics.

First we determine the moment generated by the load. The 3000 lb load is centered at a point 3 ft from the pivot, which gives us a moment of 9000 ft-lbs.

M = Fd = 3000 x 3 = 9000

Now the vertical component of the force generated by the cylinder has a moment arm of 16.23 inches (1.35 ft), so we need a force of 6650 lbs to generate the 9000 ft-lb moment.

F = M/d = 9000/1.35 = 6670

The vertical component of the force generated by the cylinder is going to be the total force of the cylinder times the sine of the angle ABC. (sine 12.2 degrees = .211). So the cylinder needs to generate a force of about 31,600 lbs.

F = Fv / sin(12.2) = 6670/.211 = 31,600

But this is just to support the weight of the load. You will need more force to actually lift the load, both to overcome friction and to accelerate the load upward. So maybe 40,000 lbs.

The determining factors on the size of cylinder you need are the distance from the pivot point and angle ABC. Increasing either of these will reduce the force required to lift the load. Of course, as you've probably already figured out, it is difficult to increase one without decreasing the other.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Buzzman72

09-29-2006 04:24:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
Now, I dropped out of engineering school after just one year...but it appears to me that, based upon the way most dump-bed hoists I've ever seen operate, you have the angle of the cylinder wrong. That is, point A should be on the trailer frame, and point B should be on the bed. Why do I say this? Because if you extend your cylinder from B to A, your hydraulic force is pushing AGAINST pivot point C. But if you moved point A vertically down to the frame, and point B was moved vertically up to the bed, extending line AB [which is the result of extending your hydraulic cylinder] would have the desired effect of raising the bed from the left side of the drawing, when the bed pivots on the frame at point C.

To have a hydraulic cylinder represented by line AB as drawn, and have it actually lift the bed, pivot point C would have to be on the LEFT side of the diagram. To do otherwise, when cylinder AB extends, you lose the advantage of leverage.

Think of your trailer as a lever, with the fulcrum at point C. To attempt to lift a load with the average weight at the center of the trailer, by attaching your cylinder to point A as illustrated is, in effect, shortening the length of your lever...as point A is where your upward force vector would be. But if you reversed the direction of line AB, to where point A was on the frame and point B was on the bed, your upward force vector would now be at point B...and your "lever" length from fulcrum C to new lift point B is longer...thus requiring less force to lift the load.

I hope I expressed myself clearly here. If you examine most hydraulic dump beds, such as grain beds, the cylinders are most often anchored to the truck frame at point A, in relation to the fulcrum/pivot point C...and anchored to the bed at point B...so that when the cylinder extends, the left side in your diagram would be the one being raised.

As I said, I dropped out of engineering school after a year, so I can't help you with the amount of force needed to dump the trailer. But I do know the laws of physics enough to understand that lifting at point B, rather than point A, takes less effort because you've lengthened your [effective] lever.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bill in IN

09-29-2006 04:20:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
I think what has you fooled is that it"s not one problem but several. First is the actual weight to be lifted (balance point), then fulcrum to lift point ratio, then the actual vs. apparent lift.

You eat an elephant one bite at a time.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
old

09-28-2006 21:27:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
I also can't answer your question other then to tell you to look at other set ups. Look at dump trucks and other dump beds and how they work. If you where close I have a few set ups you could look at



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Davis In SC

09-28-2006 20:54:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Terry G, 09-28-2006 20:34:28  
No way I can answer this, I am just a country bumpkin, but I do remember a real heated discussion on this same topic, several years ago...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
biggerred

09-29-2006 07:08:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to Davis In SC, 09-28-2006 20:54:55  
And I thought there was just old farmers here, dang do I feel stupid right about now!!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

09-29-2006 09:55:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to biggerred, 09-29-2006 07:08:35  
Yup! :)

I will agree the cylinder is located in about the worst possible location. Need a longer one closer to the end - or flip it around so it is pushing to the front. Or you get into some _serious_ forces.

--->Paul



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Terry G

09-29-2006 14:45:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT - But I am buiding a tool in reply to paul, 09-29-2006 09:55:08  
Good point Paul. The drawing was used just to illustrate the problem so someone could give me the formual to calculate the force. Now that I have the formula I will play with different cylinders and mounting positions to find the best one. Thanks for the replys.
Terry G



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy