Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum

Geothermal response for T-Bone

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
ltf in nc

01-28-2001 19:51:42




Report to Moderator

Did you review the the heat pumps such as in the attached link when you considered a heating/cooling source for the home?




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
T_Bone

01-29-2001 09:31:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: Geothermal response for T-Bone in reply to ltf in nc, 01-28-2001 19:51:42  
Hi ltf, Sure did consider ground source heat pumps (GSHP) but the numbers were not cost effective even for Arizona the heat pump (HP) dream land of the USA. AZ is considered the best place for a HP because it averages 45F during the winter time with 30%RH. It just don't get any better than that for HP efficentacy.

The proplem with GSHP is the intial unit cost and higher installation costs. With these figures added in, the "total overall costs" are much higher than a typical HP even with the energy savings added in. If that wasn't the case, we would be installing them very fast, when in fact there an extremally hard sell item.

Theres another consideration for any type of HP. They don't feel like there heating to the average homeowner, anotherwords the preceived warmth felt by a human will not be the same and people tend to feel on the cool side although the room temperature is the same. This is because a HP average output temps are 115F while a typical gas untit is 130F. The same problem occured for people switching from wood heat to gas forced air heat. The air movement is the problem. Any air movement during heating and you feel cool, but during cooling season the air movement feels good.

As any new item comes to market theres allways a big savings claimed but rarely that is the case. HP when they first hit Denver back in the 70's had the same sales hype, but in realility HP's were over three times the cost to operate not facturing in the additional unit cost.

Something else to consider is how Electricity came to be installed in every home. Back 100yrs ago every farmer made his own electricity by wind generators. They were simple units and very efficent and the farmer could work on the unit himself adding big savings over hiring service people. The electric utilitys came in and offered the farmer almost free electricty, free upkeep, provided that the farmer would give up his windmill when the "new" electricity was installed. With in 3yrs there was no more windmills to be had and the company's making them went out of business, then the electric utilitys raised the cost to double what the farmer was paying to maintain his own unit and within another 3yrs doubled again.

History does repeat it's self and the Electric company's are really pushing hard for the same thing to happen once again. Just another thought!

T_Bone

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ltf in nc

01-29-2001 20:48:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Geothermal response for T-Bone in reply to T_Bone, 01-29-2001 09:31:37  
T_Bone, I have read your response and I am not wanting to argue but my actual results using a water source HP are much different than your findings. I installed the unit cheaper than an air to air heat pump. Since the geothermal unit operates off my well water (56F) I did not have to install the strip heat in the air handler since I do not have to render heat from the outside air below 30 F where air to air units do not function efficiently. The house is warm in winter and cool in summer and the utility bill is low. Late November to late Dec. the bill was $147 for all electricity consumed. The house has 2985 sq. feet of heated area and 9 ft. ceilings plus an equal size basement that is not heated but the floor is not insulated to permit some escaping heat to condition the area somewhat. Windows are numerous, thermal pane and fairly large. Winter costs are greater than summer. As for the utility charges, I can only influence through the state utility commisson as to my attitude on the fees. At the moment, all of us are being impacted by rising fuel prices regardless of type. I am most satisfied with the device and can substantiate that I have gotten good value for my investment and I will install another one when the need arises as these units do truly pay for themselves. Should your need for a system surface again, I believe that you too would benefit to reconsider a geothermal heat pump. Good luck and keep warm.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

01-30-2001 11:51:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Geothermal response for T-Bone in reply to ltf in nc, 01-29-2001 20:48:10  
Hi ltf, Disappointing to see that posters feel just because they have a different opinion it's an automatic agruement. As far as I'm concerned, this is a great topic for discussion as it's one of my great interests in engineering.

You results would be different for your area effected by, utility costs, unit and installition costs, geothermal ground source, manfactures intrest in the area. If you reread my orginal comment, I stated "for this application" and in my area at the current time frame. This field changes really fast so I have no doubt it would be cost effective for you.

Without you explaining your system, I thought you were refferring to a GSHP and not a true geothermal HP (GTHP). The difference in the GSHP and a GTHP, is the GSHP only is effected buy ground temperature alone. Not that efficent but more efficent than a air to air exchange unit, but unit and installation is not cost effective for this area. Even for me to install a system for my self at my cost is not cost effective. Here in the summer time Relative Humidity(RH) drops to 10%RH and evaporatative coolers work very well.

I would love to have your well water temperature here. My cooling costs would be about $20 mth, if that much. With our well water temps, it could be used for heating and preheating but only if one maintains there own systems.

The biggest change in refrigeration in the past 50yrs is the skroal compression cycle. This is a very effeicent compressor and almost a indistructible compressor. Now if the manufactures just don't make them out of cheap materials we got it made.

T_Bone

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

01-29-2001 16:24:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Geothermal response for T-Bone in reply to T_Bone, 01-29-2001 09:31:37  
Our house was built in '27, it still has a concrete block in one room where the gas engine was, & a bank of batteries were. Plastered holes in the wall where the air in & exaust went out too. The engine charged up the batteries, and the house ran on 32 volts. Still over 1/2 the wiring in the house is from that home plant, it must be 10 gauge wire!

I think REA came 4 years later, or abouts then.

--->Paul

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

01-30-2001 12:05:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Geothermal response for T-Bone in reply to paul, 01-29-2001 16:24:15  
Hi Paul, I haven't figured that out lately but did at one time and if a person maintains there own system along with solar pannels, it's cost effective. Back when, I beleive the total engery cost was $30mth for a total "off grid" system and that figure should have dropped because solar pannel costs have really dropped and solar pannel efficentacy has risen a small amount. Off grid = no commerical electric utility.

Your house would be much cheaper to set up as it's already wired for a solar/combustion engine system.

T_Bone

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy