Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Tool Talk Discussion Forum

Higher voltage for vehicles?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Bus Driver

06-23-2004 05:26:59




Report to Moderator

For some time, I had heard about the plan to go to 42 volts on vehicles but had no specifics. Based on what I read recently, Mercedes was the prime mover behind the 42 volt plan and have now abandoned it. Mechanics were getting stronger tingles than they liked and Mercedes found the benefits were not as great as they hoped. You won't have to buy new battery chargers after all.




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
leland

06-27-2004 21:36:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Bus Driver, 06-23-2004 05:26:59  
one of you guy were talking about people dying from jumping their cars .G.M put out a service warning to there techs ,seems about 30 have died while working under hood new coils may only be 12 V but the amps and voltage seem to stop your heart in the blink of an eye after 12 volts is not dangerous is it



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-27-2004 22:29:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to leland, 06-27-2004 21:36:26  
You must be talking about the secondary side output from an electronic ignition system? Some of the aftermarket MSD moduals do send primary voltage to the coil at up to 470 volts. Plenty voltage with enough current behind it to be lethal.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mike M

06-24-2004 09:48:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Bus Driver, 06-23-2004 05:26:59  
I have read some articals on this that said it would be 36V operating at 42V. I have always hated this idea from the first I heard it mentioned. I guess this comes from being around John Deere 24V tractors.24V caused enough troubles I'd hate to see all that 36V would cause.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe (Wa)

06-25-2004 23:23:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Mike M, 06-24-2004 09:48:54  
Heck, we used to say the same thing about 12v. Dang lights burnt out as soon as you pulled out the switch. Got a box fulla 6v bulbs, ain't a 12v bulb in 30 miles. Ever tried driving by flashlight?

Joe



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

06-23-2004 21:12:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Bus Driver, 06-23-2004 05:26:59  
As others have stated, I am not looking to get into the fight here, but to simply answer the question asked.

Auto mfgrs have been looking at 42/48 volts sytems for quite awhile but can not agree on a common system. The battery mfgs of the world are ready to make them, once they can all agree on one way to go. Most are looking at having a 12 volt starting system, thus not having to re-invent that, but then transfer to a 36/42/48 (thus the disagreement) operating system to run all the toys that buyers demand these days.

The charger company I work for has many prototypes working, and waiting for some kind of stardard to be developed.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-23-2004 08:29:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Bus Driver, 06-23-2004 05:26:59  
"42" volt which is really 48V when operating is the max voltage that it's considered to be safe working with bare hands without getting a damaging/fatal dose of current. Same reason why anything but the lightest home tools should be operated on 240V. And why industry prefers 600V three phase over 208,416 or 480V. A 42 volt system would allow existing equipment to be built with lighter/cheaper conductors and have the same power. Or the same sized components could produce 3-1/2 times more power. It will make regenerative braking/acceleration assist cheaper/lighter/smaller to meet fuel economy standards. Faster defrosting whindshields, warmer car seats and all electric steering/brakes. Next questions will be someone wanting to take the generator off thier balky B Deere or Fergy and convert to an alternator. Then wonder if the starter will handle 42V and the worn out tractor start better.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ben in KY

06-24-2004 07:12:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to buickanddeere, 06-23-2004 08:29:35  
I am a trained Electronics Technician with specialized training for telephone power systems.I worked for many years in the Telephone industry which typically uses 48VDC battery strings with up to 2,000 amp hour individual cells. Those 48VDC battery strings will vaporize a crowbar shorted across them but will only tingle a bit on tough skin and make you jump just a bit on your more sensitive skin. I used to check for 48V with my fingertips, just a slight tingle and I knew it was hot.

IMHO the move to higher voltages is just a way to make cheaper cars. ie smaller gauge wires, etc. But you the consumer will pay much more for each replacement battery. And with more cells in the battery the odds of the battery going bad increase. They save we pay as usual.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ron

06-23-2004 10:38:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to buickanddeere, 06-23-2004 08:29:35  
Now I KNOW you are some 9 year old posing as an expert. Except that most 9 year olds know that voltage has absolutely nothing to do with electrocution danger.

Current is what kills. AMPS. Get that through your head!

As long as there is enough voltage to overcome the resistance, current will flow, if enough does, you die.

For example, many of us who actually have dealt with electricity have been exposed to 25KV - 50KV with nothing more than a sharp sting. Of course, it was milliamp current. On the other hand, you can easily kill a human being with 12V but in the interest of keeping some kid like you from trying it out, I'm not going to describe it further.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kendall

06-24-2004 07:46:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Ron, 06-23-2004 10:38:14  
Ron, You are correct in that its the current that kills, but since current=voltage divided by resistance and the human body has a "fixed" resistance then in order to increase the current you have to increase the voltage. This is why you see signs that say "Danger- High Voltage"



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MarkB

06-23-2004 16:51:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Ron, 06-23-2004 10:38:14  
Ron,

In general, higher voltages are more dangerous than lower voltages. If this were not true, then you would never hear of an electrocuted lineman, but every day you'd hear about someone who was electrocuted while jump-starting their car.

Yes, it is true that you need to exceed a certain current threshold to cause injury or death, but the probability of that increases with voltage.

Now the experience that most of us have with high voltages is the secondary side of an automotive ignition system. Although the voltage is in the tens of thousands of volts, the coil is not capable of sourcing enough current to cause harm. Also, the brief pulse has relatively little energy and, because of its high frequency components, the current tends to travel through the outer surface of your skin instead of going through your heart.

The bottom line is that your skin is an insulator, but it's only good to about 50 volts. Above that, it becomes a pretty good conductor.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-24-2004 07:49:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to MarkB, 06-23-2004 16:51:36  
Getting "electrocuted" while jump starting a vehicle maybe is the story told 3rd hand by non electrical background persons. Likely just getting suprised by a shower of sparks and the "zzzz crackle zzzz" and the smoke gets called "electrocuted".



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ron

06-23-2004 17:39:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to MarkB, 06-23-2004 16:51:36  
That's a common misconception. Voltage has nothing to do with danger for the reasons I gave. Once enough voltage is present to overcome resistance, current will flow. Once resistance is overcome, more voltage means nothing. Electrocution is the reulkt of current passing through the body... low current has little effect, higher current has a greater effect.

Jump starting a 12V car cannot possibly be dangerous as 12V is normally not enough to penetrate skin as you pointed out.

The 7.5KV lines or whatever they are in your area certain have enough voltage to penetrate skin, but if they delivered milliamps you would feel little or no sensation. It's the high amperage that burns/kills linemen.

I do agree that certain combinations of voltage/amps affect different parts of the body differently. That's why getting tangled up with a household 220V line at 20 amps is remarkably effective in stopping the human heart.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-24-2004 06:20:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Ron, 06-23-2004 17:39:53  
The body is not like a fluorescent tube which is all practical purposes an open circuit at "low voltages". Then begins to conduct at a "trigger voltage" when the gas is excited into ionized state by the heating coils on each end. And then the high voltage potential end to end will "strike the arc". Then the tube resistance then dramatically drops and current readily flows. Hence the requirement of the ballast to also be a current limiter via inductive reactance. The body's current response to voltage is linear, that is current is proportional to voltage at the most common lower voltages. At high voltages or long duration shocks the current path become carbon tracked. Or when the skin is actually punctured with voltage in the thousands and then does drop much lower in resistance. By that time the victim is dead or wishes they were. There is a world of difference getting poked with voltages under 120V vs. being a linesman working with 4160, 25KV etc. AC voltage is expressed in RMS ( root mean squared) values to indicate equivalent values with DC on a heating load. 120VAC at 60 cycles varies 120 times a second ranges from zero to 170 volts to be "equal" to 120VDC. DC at the same voltage as AC, is usually considered meaner poke as the current is continuous rather than dropping to below 50V 120 times a second with AC. At work it's a pretty solemn and attentive affair working with 4KV, although care should be taken with any voltage. I�m pretty careful even just picking up the megger leads and making certain the charge is drained off the cable sheaths or voltage hasn�t been induced by an adjoining energized cable. Rather not be a statistic. All said, a 42/48VDC automobile isn't a particularly serious electrical hazard.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Darren in TN

06-23-2004 11:02:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Ron, 06-23-2004 10:38:14  

Ron, Are you sure 12v can be fatal? It seems to me that the resistance inherent to the human body would prevent sufficient current from being passed through it (according to I=V/R.)

Not trying to pick a fight, i just know I've shorted a 12v car battery from one hand to the other without suffering too much of an effect.

Darren



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-23-2004 11:20:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Darren in TN, 06-23-2004 11:02:22  
You fellows will have to excuse Ron, we have been disagreeing over ballasting tractors, power supplies to remote gate openers and now this. 48V is a commonly used voltage partly because industry accepted voltage above which a serious shock hazard exists and a higher level of safey precautions are mandated. Check your electrical code book. The average person has a body resistance from 1000 wet with salt water to 10,000 ohms with dry callouses, so do the math.

Effects of Electrical Current* on the Body 3 Current Reaction 1 milliamp Just a faint tingle. 5 milliamps Slight shock felt. Disturbing, but not painful. Most people can "let go." However, strong involuntary movements can cause injuries. 6-25 milliamps (women)�
9-30 milliamps (men) Painful shock. Muscular control is lost. This is the range where "freezing currents" start. It may not be possible to "let go." 50-150 milliamps Extremely painful shock, respiratory arrest (breathing stops), severe muscle contractions. Flexor muscles may cause holding on; extensor muscles may cause intense pushing away. Death is possible. 1,000-4,300 milliamps (1-4.3 amps) Ventricular fibrillation (heart pumping action not rhythmic) occurs. Muscles contract; nerve damage occurs. Death is likely. 10,000 milliamps (10 amps) Cardiac arrest and severe burns occur. Death is probable. 15,000 milliamps (15 amps) Lowest overcurrent at which a typical fuse or circuit breaker opens a circuit!

*Effects are for voltages less than about 600 volts. Higher voltages also cause severe burns.
�Differences in muscle, skin thickness, surface moisture and fat content affect the severity of shock.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ron

06-23-2004 11:19:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Darren in TN, 06-23-2004 11:02:22  
OK, I'll give you a glimpse of how it's done...

If one were to take a fresh 9V battery and place the terminals on his tongue...

That's all I'm going to say.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-23-2004 12:37:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Ron, 06-23-2004 11:19:30  
Around here we don't use our tongue as a tool to work on live circuits. We don't get fresh with 9V batteries in any body orifice(s) either. I suggest the doubters check with the local occupational heath and safety regulations plus the electrical code book in your area for working voltages. When working on any circuitry, take your metallic watch, ring, necklaces etc off. Even on less than 12V they can turn red or white hot if shorted across a high current source. Or any jewelry can just get snagged and pull you into moving equipment as well. A 42/48V automotive electrical system is the max that most agenecies consider safe to work on live with bare hands. Or let the general public get near. Some people will get a poke now and again but most trades people have calloused hands with higher resistance. There is the occassional danger of involuntary dropping tools or reflex movments into obstructions.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fred OH

06-23-2004 12:22:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicles? in reply to Ron, 06-23-2004 11:19:30  
I was taught that it takes around 30 volts to kill you...but don't get me caught up in your argument...you guys are doing just fine. I will tell Ron that his method of testing a 9 volt battery is a no-no...I know of a guy that uses his pen*s to test them with. Fred OH



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

06-24-2004 02:49:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for vehicle in reply to Fred OH, 06-23-2004 12:22:30  
Hi Glen & Ron,

Please excuse my jumping in here where I should keep my nose out of the bickering between you two guys.

I believe everyone enjoys a topic with a good debate of "facts" but when it comes down to name calling or personal attacks, people will loose interest real quick.

That being said, I enjoy reading both your inputs on this forum without the personal attacks.

Just my thoughts!

***********************************************

I was always taught that 50v was the NEC cut off between low and high voltage considerations. I never looked it up in the code book so I agree Glen's reading of the NEC of 48v and also the posting of the human body resistance numbers as I've never knew of the exact numbers (good snag).

"Most" people can deal with high DC voltage, low current, well without too many side effects. DC current travels one way, from negitive to positive (non-electronic circuits).

However AC voltage travels both ways or alternates between hot and neutral and is more dangerous to "most" people than DC as it doubles the current absorbed by the body.

I think most of us working on engines have at one time grabed that spark plug wire at the wrong time and got hit with 10k vDC shock without any permanate harm. But beware as thats not always the case.

I was working with a man one time that was using a chain for a safety lanyard (many moons ago when legal) welding "I" beams when he got hung up with the electrode on the chain with his bare leg touching the "I" beam. That was about 18vdc and 180amps and I had to turn the welding machine off to stop his muscle contractions. He spent a few days in the hospital.

The "majority" of the people touching a 115vac 15amp circuit will be seriously injured or die because the alternating high current contracts the muscles to where you can't let go.

Most sparky's will tell you that they would rather be hit by 230vac plus voltage as that usually will burn off the offending body part and give you a chance to live.

I was working on a AC unit one time wearing a new SS watch I got for fathers day and hit a 340vac capacitor with the SS band. Lucky it burnt the band off the wire and only left me with a serious wrist burn.

Another time I stuck my welding electrode to the top of my wedding band.

As stated, take off any metal personal items from your body when working with any type electricity.

T_Bone

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Matt Clark

06-24-2004 08:28:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Higher voltage for veh in reply to T_Bone, 06-24-2004 02:49:56  
...16 years old. Buddy drove a '66 Impala. 'Nother buddy says "...let's try somethin'...", so we ran a 16 ga stranded wired out from the coil, under the car and in the back door...

Bared 'bout 6 inches of copper and frayed it all out and fed it up between seat and back and laid it on the driver's seat and waited...

Hee, hee, pretty mean and all, but man did he squall like a girl when he hit that key!!!

Coulda prolly kilt him, but I'm gigglin' right now, 24 years later just thinkin' about it! Cheez 'n rice, that was funny.

Course that's the same buddy who's boots got soaked (just the steel toes, mind you) with lighter fluid while he slept, hung over, in a chair. Took about a minute to burn off...and that woke him up!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy