Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Discussion Forum

Welding rod selection

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
robert j spence

07-24-2000 18:04:15




Report to Moderator

could someone please explain the diff between 7018 and 7014?
I already know that 7014 is iron powder and 7018 is low hyd. but for practicle appkications what are the diff. and why doesit matter?




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Dick

08-06-2000 14:49:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: welding rod selection in reply to robert j spence, 07-24-2000 18:04:15  
I use 7014 a lot because it is easy to run,all purpose, it will run up,down,flat,upsidedown.I use 7018 for all flexing welds,it will not brake when flexed.7018 is not as easy to use,but it is stronger for critical welds.
I hope this helps.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-26-2000 07:11:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: welding rod selection in reply to robert j spence, 07-24-2000 18:04:15  
Hello Robert, In the days when these old electrodes were used on the production line, they were identified in such a way that allowed manufacturers to pick and choose electrodes bases on the application and the known composition of the metal. Part of the luxury of welding under the "Ideal" conditions created only on the production floor. Forget that when you work in the maintenance department.

Here is a brief description of the code. "E" designates an arc welding electrode. The next two digits, in this case "70" designate a minimum tensile strength of 70,000 P.S.I. as welded. The following digit, in this case a "1" designates an all position electrode. The last digit, describes several things. It describes the power supply, type of covering, type of arc penetration and the presence of iron powder. ( Some of these electrodes used to be color coded.) In regard to the 7018, the polarity is designated to be DCRP or AC. The coating is of the low hydrogen variety. Lime coverings and titania and iron powder coverings are used to achieve this. The 7014 is designated DCRP, DCSP, and AC.

In comparison of the two electrodes it is the last digit which sets them apart. In the realm of welding, when alloy steels are subjected to hydrogen in the molten state, a condition known as hydrogen embrittlement occurs. ( Not good if we're talking about the truck frame you just extended or the bridge beams you joined.) To overcome this, the low hydrogen coating creates a gaseous atmosphere around the arc and holds the atmosphere at bay.

After about 30 minutes exposure to the atmosphere, the electrode coating has drawn enough moisture to require baking at 250°F to remove enough moisture to restore the low hydrogen effects of the coating. Unless this procedure is followed, the electrode becomes a miniature hydrogen and O2 factory. (A positive electrode in water separates the O2 and a negative electrode separates the hydrogen. This is one method used to commercially produce O2 and hydrogen.) In extreme cases, the gas being produced under the coating develops enough pressure to "blow" the coating off the wire during welding.

This is why I cringe when I see people buy welding electrodes at auctions or when I see electrodes lying in an open tray for sale at the farm and home store. Things like this are what breathed life into companies like the one I work for. The differences between production conditions and maintenance conditions put them at opposite ends of the scale. Maintenance electrodes are designed for extended storage and less than ideal welding conditions. More often than not, you will have no control over contaminants, temperature of the metal, welding position or base metal composition. The skill or lack there of in regard to the weldor are also taken into consideration among other things. Most of my customers are not welding experts but are experts in other fields, such as, farming, machining, electrical, mechanical, engineering, etc. and in their day to day operations, they also weld. It is also beneficial to me in knowing these people when I need help outside of my field of expertise.
Steve

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Robert J Spence

07-26-2000 08:16:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-26-2000 07:11:13  

Thankyou for your reply.
Could you further explain the common uses of 7014 since it does not sound like a fair match to the 7018



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
doug bennett

04-08-2001 19:43:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Robert J Spence, 07-26-2000 08:16:35  
please help me identify some welding rod that is labeled "308-16". Thanks for the help. Doug



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-26-2000 15:05:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Robert J Spence, 07-26-2000 08:16:35  
Hi Robert,

Sure. Flux composition is iron powder titania. The "4" designation indicates an electrode of medium penetration, thick slag, convex bead, fast deposition. The 7014 claim to fame in it's heyday was speed. It's one of the least common designations today and has become somewhat obscure.
Steve



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
clickent

07-26-2000 17:08:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-26-2000 15:05:13  
Steve, I enjoy your comments and have learned a thing or two from you but you're all washed up on this one.
Obscure? I don't think so. Sure stick welding in general is past its heyday with the advances in MIG equipment but 7014 is far from obscure. I challenge you to find a better general purpose rod that is available at most any farm supply store. There are better rods for some applications, but for the average joe in his garage or on the farm the 7014 is the best all purpose rod. I buy my rods from three different suppliers, two here in NC and one in Texas, and I can tell just by the shelves that 7014 is their number one seller. It is certainly not obscure in Dixie! As a guy that burns rods in the field everyday for a living there are three things that the 7014 have going for it. 1)Medium penetration (as compared to the 7018 shallow penetration) 2)It is truly an all position rod 3)and lastly ease of cleanup (a real time saver). Steve is right about speed. This slag cleans up so easy that I wait until I've ran my last bead then chip off the slag that hasn't fallen off. Each rod has its place and 7014's place is all purpose champ. 7018's place is critical apps. I use both.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
alan

01-31-2002 08:42:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-26-2000 17:08:21  
to get much more info regarding welding rod selection



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-27-2000 06:22:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-26-2000 17:08:21  
Hello Clickent,
Your exception is both noted and appreciated. There is nothing more stimulating to the mind than an informed discussion between gentlemen.

Most weldors, especially the better ones, are very particular about the quality of their work. Right down to the cosmetic aspects which you and I both know is not always the most important part of the equation.

Weldors also tend to be very opinionated in regard to their personal preferences concerning consumables. I have my favorites as well.

Having said that, I must also realize that things change. Especially in todays world. If I am not open minded, I cannot grow as an individual or as a professional.

I would like to share these thoughts. Stick welding is far from dead in general. Upwards of 40% of welding is still done using the SMAW process. This is due mainly to the shortcomings of the GMAW process in so many maintenance applications. Stick still shines in less than ideal conditions to mention just one advantage. I would agree that the advent of the wire welder has killed off much of the brazing rod market to date.

Regarding the 7014. You are correct in stating that fast clean-up is a 7014 virtue. That is not however what I meant by "speed". The 7014 gets it's speed from the iron powder in the flux. As the electrode burns off, the iron powder becomes part of the deposited metal creating a high deposition effect. This concept has been improved upon greatly in modern electrode designs for stick welding and continuos electrodes for wire weldors. Some electrodes boast an efficiency rating of 140% or more. Also, the advent of multi-pass electrodes in various forms has eliminated the need to chip at all between passes in many multi-pass applications.

You have challenged me to present a better general purpose electrode than 7014 that would be available at most farm and home stores. My wife is a bookeeper and office manager at one of our local farm and home stores. It's one of my favorite stores. It is the last bastion of mens shopping left in our community. Everything from bolts to bullets. But, they carry the same welding supplies they did 20 years ago and any form of good technical assistance is non-existent. It's just not what they do. I would be more than happy to send you a free sample of one or two different electrodes from our facility. Send me a private e-mail and describe the typical welding application you encounter. It may or may not change your mind, but it will certainly broaden your horizons.
Steve

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve Carmack

07-29-2000 11:31:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-27-2000 06:22:45  
I am a small time farmer with older equipment that requires a good bit of welding. I build up worn stuff, patch stress cracks in implements, and do some welding for the public. I don't charge others because I am not that good. I use 6011 and 7018's mostly because that's what has been recommended by friends who advise me. To Steve of U.S. Alloys, what would you recommend for me to try on general stick-welding jobs? I am open to new stuff.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-30-2000 09:37:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve Carmack, 07-29-2000 11:31:47  
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your inquiry. I think I should send you a private e-mail in regard to your request. That way I don't step on the toes of those who run this forum. I get away with quite a bit already.
Steve



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tyler(WA)

08-01-2000 09:25:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-30-2000 09:37:42  
Hi Steve,

I've enjoyed your posts on welding rod selection for general farm application.

I too, use 6011 and 7018 for my straight AC stick machine. I plan to make a full bridge rectifier and add additional sockets to make it an AC/DC machine. I have a strong background in electronic R&D and know what I'm doing when it comes to properly designing and installing this sort of equipment.

Your brochure and recomendations for good rod selection for my applications would be greatly appreciated. If you could send me a copy also, I would be grateful.

Tyler Woods
4820 Center Ln, NE
Olympia WA 98516

Thanks again.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Drew

08-26-2001 13:59:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Tyler(WA), 08-01-2000 09:25:25  
Steve,

90% of my welding is done on 1/4" material or smaller. I currently use 6013 and 7018 rods as well as .035 MIG wire. Is there a better all-purpose rod out there? if so please enlighten me.
I am a novice welder who usually just dobs around on the farm. My local store manager has told me to try 5P rods, What do you think? Also, what size is the best all around rod? example 3/32, 1/8, 5/32. Look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks,

Drew

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

08-01-2000 12:56:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Tyler(WA), 08-01-2000 09:25:25  
Hello Tyler,
I will send you a couple of samples of an alloy or two that work out very well in farm applications.

There will be a maintenance manual included that will be a handy reference guide for general repair applications and directions for usage in regard to the appropriate alloy.

Some additional info will follow by e-mail.
Steve



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
doug

02-23-2001 17:00:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 08-01-2000 12:56:25  
Steve, I was recomended to you by a friend who said you are THE welding guru.
Is there any way that I can weld 1/4" steel with my M&W 230 buzz box and expect it to hold up to heavy loads?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
clickent

07-27-2000 08:15:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-27-2000 06:22:45  
Steve,
Thank you for your reply. As always I've learned something from you.

140% efficiency rating for an electrode is amazing! As a small business owner I'm always trying to improve profit my lowering cost without cutting quality. I get my electrodes for about $1 a pound (includes shipping). That makes GMAW the least expensive process I do. Folks that sell MIG equipment tell me that MIG is cheaper because the efficiency is well over 90% but I use a MIG machine too and I know that pound for pound it is more expensive than GMAW.

My previous postings were meant for the average guy (novice)that needs an all purpose rod, that he can purchase at his local store, that is not too expensive. I believe that 7014 fits this discription well. It is not my favorite rod but if pressed to pick an all purpose rod for a friend (we are all friends here) this is my choice.

I've sent you an email. It is difficult to give a typical application so I gave you a situation where I could see a improvement in rod capability. My business is mainly on site welding and I never know what next week has in store for me. I weld in a variety of conditions on a variety of things. A couple of my regular customers have a competition between them on how difficult they can make my next project. Have you ever seen anybody MIG aluminum overhead with a mirror before?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-27-2000 14:13:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-27-2000 08:15:23  
Hi Terry,
I got your e-mail and answered it promptly. Thank you for sending it.

You know, the people who told you that MIG is over 90% stretched it a little if they were talking about solid wire. It's actually about 87% at best. (Stick is about 47%.) The main reasons are: no stub loss, no flux weight, less spatter. You must use a metal cored wire to get into the 140% range. You also have the option of the different types of arc that MIG is capable of producing that can dramatically increase travel speeds. Taking that into consideration, you can pay twice as much for wire as for rod and just about come out dead even in operating cost comparison.

As I stated to you in my reply to your e-mail, I know now that what you do is very similar to what job shops do. Anything and everything. In all my years of being in the factories and mines and so forth, I have come to learn how challenging that kind of environment can be. I guess that's what makes it fun. Never a dull moment, right? In regard to welding Al overhead with a mirror, it's hard enough to MIG Al out of position if it's right in front of your face. We're talkin' contortionist class welding here. Steve

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jay Ladouceur

08-14-2004 23:27:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod select in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-27-2000 14:13:40  
Hi Steve,
I'd also be interested in learning which rods are better alternatives to 7014. Actually I wish you'd post the answer as well as replying so that the many others who'd like that information don't all have to ask you to send it to them individually. You're making a lot of work for yourself with the 'private' replies.
Regards,
Jay



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
clickent

07-29-2000 13:30:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-27-2000 14:13:40  
I love doing job shop type of work. Everyday is a new challenge. I don't know how factory welders do it. I would get bored.

Here's the short story on the Al overhead with a mirror. This friend referred a guy to me that had an old Army vehicle. He called it a goat. It has six wheels, is all aluminum and it swims. Anyway, the brake pedal bracket broke all the way up under the dashboard. It was in a spot where you could reach up and feel it, you could see it by crawling in upside down but there was no way to get in with a welding helmet on, not to mention the MIG gun. So I preped it with a die grinder and wire brush the size of a toothbrush. I positioned a shaving mirror so I could see the joint by standing next to the vehicle leaning over. I reached under with the gun and practiced a couple of times with no power. Then I had the customer turn on the power and went for it. It went perfect. Had I not done this they would have had to disassemble the cab so I saved them about twenty hours. If it didn't work then they wouldn't have lost anything. I got alot of referals off of that job.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-30-2000 09:30:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-29-2000 13:30:06  
Pipe fitters have to get into those situations regularly. Many of them have purchased a leather hood from me so when they need to wedge their head in some place tight the protection goes in with them. Sometimes they still end up using the mirror though.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
john d

07-27-2000 12:19:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-27-2000 08:15:23  
In a mirror???? That sounds a little like the dentist I know that filled his own tooth!

Seriously.....I'm learning a lot from the discussion you guys are having! THANKS!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Greg

07-26-2000 23:53:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-26-2000 17:08:21  
Right, and 7024 is a good mud rod. 7018 is a great rod in its place, and most likely one of the most over-used rods going, [by most welders]. With so different types of applications we all come to have our favorites. With the kind of welding [stick], my own "do it all" rod or what I use the most of is 6011



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
clickent

07-27-2000 06:46:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Greg, 07-26-2000 23:53:42  
6011 will never die as long as we have to weld through rust. About a month ago I had to do some repair work on a old dump bed (the sides). I must had put 10 lbs into that thing.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
clickent

07-25-2000 18:10:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: welding rod selection in reply to robert j spence, 07-24-2000 18:04:15  
Great question! Here is what I know.
7018 was designed to produce a x-ray quality weld. That means that the produced weld will be very dense and if properly done stand up to the most ardous inspection. 7014 can't say that but it is a better rod for alot of applications for a number of reasons. 1) 7014 is a better penetrating 2) Is almost self cleaning (sneeze hard enough and the slag will pop off)
3) Has better freeze characteristics (important when welding anything but flat)
4) And just smells better! It is the rod I use most often. I use 7018 on critical applications but because it isn't a deep penatrator it requires good metal prep (which should be done all the time anyway). If you weld on submarines stick with 7018 (joke) but most of the time 7014 is a excellant rod that is easier to use.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fred OH

07-27-2000 06:24:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-25-2000 18:10:58  
Well, I see we kicked around the 14s and 18s and got that all squared away but the guy down below running the 6011 probably has as strong a welds as the 70k rod. Because of its deeper penetration, it is better for general purpose welding. It'll weld through rust, scale, and paint better than any of them. If you have ever welded on plow shares or mold boards, it's the greatest with it's flat bead. Don't need any humped up weld beads here. But gawd that awful smell. Probably why a lot of us don't use it more. For you fellows and gals that are learning, just remember to use the low hydrogen rod on the cold rolled type steels (shafting) and anything that is a casting or a forging and you'll get along okay.And now for the good part. How do you keep the low hydrogen dry? Cheapest way is an old refrigerator, preferably with no plastic inside and flat on top, (You need a place to put your welding helmet) You disable the compressor and break off the door switch so that the lightbulb stays on all the time. "What", "Say you done that and the lightbulb won't last over three weeks at the most"! Well, heres something that you can learn out of this post that will be of real benefit to you. Go to the incoming 120 volt line and clip one leg of it (either one) and install a 2 or 3 anp diode in it (makes no difference which way you install it) and tape or shrink it over. (Available at Radio Shack for less than a dollar). Then put a 100 watt light bulb in the refrigerator and you got about 150 degrees of heat in there. Produces more heat than light because your removing one half of the AC sinusoidal wave and using pulsating DC. I wouldn't advise over 100 watts or you'll melt the rubber door seal. Keep an eye on it for a while, don't want anyone building a fire hazard. Keep the metal boxed rod close (7018), keep the cardboard boxes at a distance from the lightbulb. Last time I looked it was 1995 when I put a new lightbulb in mine. (And it was a quarter one). My motto: "You gotta get smarter than the metal". This board is a good place to do that.----L8R----Fred

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nathan(GA)

07-27-2000 07:13:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Fred OH, 07-27-2000 06:24:59  
Thanks for the tip Fred. I knew about the fridg, but not about the diode. What about a microwave because of limited space? Would it work with maybe a 40 or 25 watt?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-30-2000 09:44:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Nathan(GA), 07-27-2000 07:13:29  
I have seen refrigerators with 60 watt bulbs get hot enough to melt the inside of the fridge. A 20 watt oven bulb works pretty well. You should keep a thermometer in there too because some flux coatings deteriorate quite rapidly when stored at 130°F or more.
Steve



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fred OH

08-06-2000 22:11:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-30-2000 09:44:02  
I put them down at the bottom. It's usually about 150 degrees up at the top but probably about right down near the bottom of the refrigerator.
L8R----Fred



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fred OH

07-27-2000 07:56:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Nathan(GA), 07-27-2000 07:13:29  
Hi Nathan, About the micro wave for welding rod, I've never found one that would hold the welding rod with the ends heading out like I want them. (In the volume that I like to keep on hand). I think they're 14" long and just too long for any micro wave that I've seen. But might be alright for small amount laid sideways and marked accordingly. Also theres a lot of vent holes to cover over on the micro wave.
P.S. You'll like using the quarter lightbulb for years at a time. Got an old nightlight that is hard to change when the bulb blows? Old rickety ladder bit? Do the same to it and put in one with double the wattage as the original. Burns about half brilliance but probably equal to the one with half the wattage and lasts for (who knows, maybe a decade). I bet that if you bought one of those heavy duty (and expensive) bulbs guaranteed for five years and did this trick, it may last longer than the building. Keep a truckin, we'll be smarter than the metal one of these days.
L8R----Fred

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-27-2000 14:22:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Fred OH, 07-27-2000 07:56:11  
Hiya Fred,
You know as soon as we get close to being as smart as the metal they'll invent a new metal.
Steve



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fred OH

07-31-2000 22:44:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve U.S. Alloys, 07-27-2000 14:22:08  
Steve, You know, I hate to see that day come because that new metal will by design be unweldable. And we won't have anything to talk about then. L8R----Fred



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

08-01-2000 05:55:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Fred OH, 07-31-2000 22:44:34  
We'll find somethin'. If nothin' else, we can cuss those people who came up with it. Oh, and Fred, hang on to that girlfriend.
Steve



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
clickent

07-27-2000 08:25:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Fred OH, 07-27-2000 07:56:11  
Fred, You're amazing!!!
I hate replacing light bulbs. I'd rather be tried to a post and whipped for an hour than replace the bulb in my carport.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fred OH

07-31-2000 22:24:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-27-2000 08:25:23  
Thanks for the compliment. Thats the same thing my girlfriend said!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
rad

07-27-2000 10:04:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to clickent, 07-27-2000 08:25:23  
Guys, there is a better way! You can get the diode in a little pancake looking device sold at most home improvement stores or large variety stores. They aren't advertised as diodes rather they are sold as devices that make outside flood lights last longer. Their biggest advantage is that they install simply by placing the device in the light socket before screwing in the bulb - no soldering required.
-rad

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fred OH

08-05-2000 07:16:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to rad, 07-27-2000 10:04:56  
Hi rad from Fred
I tried the method that you described with the little pancake diode and they left a little bit to be desired. First thing that I tried was putting it in a drop cord and as soon as I dropped it and went to change the bulb, the thing had melted itself to the bad bulb. And guess what? You can't get it off of the bad bulb without ruining it. So, theres another dollar wasted. And thats about what they cost too. So thats why I didn't mention them to begin with. They're just another ripoff like the lightbulb of today to me. I'm not raining on your party, their okay in the right application but the inline thing is a lot heavier duty cause you can make it that way yourself. I eventually threw all the button things away when I found the better way. A one watt resistor installed inline to pull the voltage down would probably make the bulb last longer too but it uses current given up as heat. L8R----Fred

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nathan(GA)

07-24-2000 20:31:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: welding rod selection in reply to robert j spence, 07-24-2000 18:04:15  
I'm sure Steve or somebody can give you the nitty gritty on them. From my use the 7014 is easier to weld with. It has less flux than the 7018 and seems to fill in gaps better.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve Carmack

07-30-2000 20:31:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Nathan(GA), 07-24-2000 20:31:48  
Steve U.S.Alloys, I tried to email you concerning my question. I clicked on your name and an address came up. I'm new to this so I'm not sure about things. I might have sent it to someone else. I am learning alot by reading all the welding posts. My problem is that there is some disagreement.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve U.S. Alloys

07-31-2000 06:51:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: welding rod selection in reply to Steve Carmack, 07-30-2000 20:31:06  
Hi Steve,
Thank you. I have received your communique and will respond promptly.
Steve



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy