Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum

R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant..........

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Brad

04-14-2002 19:09:56




Report to Moderator

So with summer coming it's time to recharge the air conditioning unit on my car. Since it is a '92 it has had the R12 refrigerant in it. I see that I can get conversion kits to convert it over to the newer stuff, R134A. My problem is, is that I've been told that it is not such a good idea since this might cause the inside of the unit to rust, and make my AC system not last too much longer. Is this true? or should I stick with the old refrigerant?

Brad

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Chuck

04-21-2002 19:55:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
You guys are all talking about cars and trucks. We have converted tractors and combines from R-12 to R 134A. It doesn't cool as good no way no how. There has been many days when it has been hot and the air didn' work in the combine or tractor I remember when I could buy a can of R-12 and put it in my self. It cost a dollar a can. Who is making all the money from it now.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
kb

04-20-2002 18:38:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
Interesting comments on the R12-R134A conversions. I noticed several people mentioned successful conversions, but no one mentioned an unsuccessful conversion.

I converted my '88 F150 last summer, and loved the results, COLD AIR!

My AC system developed a leak, and I took it to a Ford dealer. They charged $100+ to recharge and put some leak detector in the system, said to come by "anytime" after a few days and they would check to the leak for free. I took it back a few days later and they told me I had to have an appointment and pay to have it checked. The charge held the rest of the season, by spring it was gone.

After driving two years with no AC the wife picked up the $35 kit, plus some extra cans. I also used the 134A oil, and the sealer/conditioner stuff. Last week when it hit 90 here in KY the old AC felt pretty good.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe (Wa)

04-17-2002 19:49:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
Boy this thread is the most unprofessional collection of B.S. I seen on this site. The LICENSE is a CERTIFICATE issued by the REFRIGERATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ASSOCIATION,INC "Approved by the EPA as a certifying organization on 10/15/93". It has nothing whatever to do with technical expertise. As for the content, I don't see one post here that is 100% correct. Perhaps we should stick with tractor stuff. Joe

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bondo

04-18-2002 00:04:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Joe (Wa), 04-17-2002 19:49:07  
So why don't you give us your 100% correct opinion? You're bound to have one..... .....



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
VaTom

04-18-2002 04:10:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Bondo, 04-18-2002 00:04:53  
Yes, please. Some of us have little knowledge of the subject and are learning a great deal.

I have an opportunity to get older commercial coolers free and had wanted to incorporate a refrigerator into my next kitchen, re-using the commercial doors and compressor. I'd about given up with the licensing and gas situation but this thread sparked my interest again.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

04-19-2002 02:24:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to VaTom, 04-18-2002 04:10:43  
Yes please Joe, enlighten us on your words of wisdom and give us the straight poopie scoopie. You didn't give a reason for your thoughts?

Although some of the posts are not 100% correct they do contain valuable content.

I would like to here what was on the test when you took your Refrigerant license test?

T_Bone



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe (Wa)

04-20-2002 14:16:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to T_Bone, 04-19-2002 02:24:15  
Hi, Bondo, VaTom, T_Bone. Yes, I wrote a JERK post and deserve your comments. First of all to reiterate my JERK post, there is no such thing as a refrigeration license, it is simply a certificate issued by a licensee of the EPA. Federal law (40 CFR part 82, Subpart F) requires all handlers of suspected ozone depletion compounds be examined and certified. All halocarbon refrigerants manufactured prior to R134a are suspected as major ozone depleters.

The exam consists of approximately 50 multiple choice questions of an environmental nature, reporting accidental or intentional release of a halocarbon, recovery requirements, fines, etc. There are no refrigeration specific technical questions. The study time and complexity of the exam is just about the same as the written test for a driver�s license. Having successfully passed the exam and certified as a �Universal Technician� has the same impact re your technical expertise in the refrigerating industry as passing the written driver�s test has re your driving skills.

To lawfully work with halocarbon refrigerants you are required be certified. If you are certified, you can even call it a �Refrigeration License� and cite it as proof of your expertise while providing advice in this thread: Go to Wally World for your conversion kit. While you�re there pickup some oil additive to �rejuvenate� your engine, transmission, etc. Don�t forget the Stop Leak and Fix a Flat. Who knows when you may have to �fix� you radiator or one of the tires. Whatever floats your boat.

Anyway if anyone cares, the following federal agency info is on the back of my card R.E.P.A., INC. 7525-M Connelley Drive, Hanover, MD 21076, Ph 1-800-435-3331. The card is dated 08/31/94 so I don�t know if this info is still valid. Regards, Joe

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

04-20-2002 15:14:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Joe (Wa), 04-20-2002 14:16:30  
Hi joe,

Now thats a post someone can learn from!

Thanks,
T_Bone



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Norman

04-16-2002 11:51:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
Brad, A good drop-in for the R12 in cars is HOTSHOT. You vacuum the system and charge with HOTSHOT. Takes just a tad less freon. They tent to run colder than with R12. For refer units with R12, I use 409A. Also a drop-in. (Drop-in means it is compatible with all components including the oil.) I hope this helps. (I do have my liscense to mess with this stuff.) Later
Norman



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nolan

04-16-2002 06:07:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
Some interesting replies! As another licensed R12 refrigerant technican, I can assure you that you do not need a licence to purchase the 134 cans on the shelf at Wallmart and such. You will be breaking the law when you vent the R12 mind you.

None of my 1980's era cars are currently running R12, all have been converted to R134, without problems. Nor have any of the other vehicles I and others I know have converted had any problems, except for reduced cooling capacity.

The need to draw out the old compressor oil and replace it is a misnomer. While it is true the oils are incompatable, you are not mixing it in the crankcase of the compressor. As long as the compressor seals are functional, no problem has been encountered by me in evacuating an R12 system and recharging it with R134.

The closest to a problem I do run into with R134 is it escaping through the rubber of older hoses. While the R12 oil left on the surface of the hoses does help in retention, it does escape, requiring a recharging every year or two with a single can of R134. On those that had the hoses replaced, no recharging has been required.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mike C.

04-16-2002 08:00:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Nolan, 04-16-2002 06:07:09  
I agree with Nolan but would like to add my 2 cents worth. I am also a certified automotive refrigerant recovery/recycling technician as well as being master certified. Enough with the credibility check...

I've converted hundreds of systems and serviced the same automobiles for years after with minimal problems. One thing to keep in mind is that if the vehicle needs to be recharged then the original refrigerant has "leaked" out. Repairs must be made to the system first by a qualified technician. If any technician that has access to R-12 simply recharges the system then he is ultimatley in violation of the law because he is knowingly injecting refrigerant in a faulty system.

Testing and repairing the system is where the cost is involved. The conversion kit is very cheap as it only involves some "O" rings and larger nipples for the R-134A hook-up.

The corosion that everyone is talking about is not caused by the oils but in the early days, the belief was that all mineral oil had to be removed to a trace which required cleaning the system. It was discovered later that the cleaning process is what was causing the corosion. They found that simply vacuming down the system and seperating out the oil for measurement of volume removed and replacing with the appropriate amount of oil for the R-134A taking into account the amount needed if any of the components were replaced that there was no problem with compatibility.

I could go on and on but I've exceeded my 2 cent limit...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ludwig

04-15-2002 07:07:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
My wife drives a '91 Ford Tempo we got from my Dad 2 years ago. Dad bought the car new in '92 (I was with him).
That car was converted a few years ago but I didn't know about it, when I went the guy tried to convince me that he could put a couple pounds of the old stuff in to test if it would hold and then charge with the old stuff if it did. He said he could still get the old stuff but it was $80 per pound.
I asked Dad about it and he told me it had been converted, so when we looked into it further it just needed new seals.

Finally we saved the money by putting in a sunroof. My wife loves the sunroof and since it never gets all that hot here in New England its not really that big a problem.
Remember too that your car isn't a real powerhouse in the best of times, it'll be a dog with the A/C on. Don't get me wrong I think they're very cool cars. I almost bought one to commute with too, a convertable! I bet you didn't even know they made them! (Conversion done by a company in FL.)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
big fred

04-15-2002 12:07:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Ludwig, 04-15-2002 07:07:55  
I did a similar thing with my Ford Ranger. A/C never did work, so I bought a new window crank so I could roll down the window. The slider in the back window is generally all I need to keep cool.

BTW, the window crank also helps me get out of the truck. I need to roll down the window so I can reach out and unlatch the door from outside since the inside door latch is busted.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Leroy

04-15-2002 06:34:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
Stick with what was in the system, I can't remember the changeover year, the Metro could have had either, If R 12 then would have plain steel in system, 134 very carosive to steel, has to have stainless steel and you do have to have a licence to buy and use any of the refrigerants. I hold a universal 608 licence that would allow me to work on anything except automotive or amonia systems, the goverment regulations are so restrictave that I can't even make use of my licence, you have to acount for every 1/10th ounce of refrigerant in or out. And by the way the very same part of R12 that the goverment is so against is the verry same clorine gas that is used in the city water treatment plants and is also releaced in a volcano, was tought that in refrigeration school. And that licence is national for all states. First drove a 92 Metro that had only 18 mile on it when I picked it up for my Fatherinlaw when he won it in a church raffel. Leroy

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jim WI

04-17-2002 10:49:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Leroy, 04-15-2002 06:34:11  
You can by R134A in many states without any license (I did so just last year).

On the other hand, R12 is a lot stickier -- I don't know if you can get it anywhere without a license (there were a couple western states that were ignoring EPA on this but I don't know if they still are).



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hank

04-15-2002 03:32:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
Good luck FINDING some R 12. I used up my supply about 2 years ago, and then had to do the A/C on my truck. I ran 2 bottles of system flush through, vacuumed the heck out of the system, and installed ester oil and a 134a charge. Been blowing cold for the past 2 summers, and that's in sweltering Nebraska heat. I do all my own work, but I imagine any shop you go to will want to convert, its probably less expensive. Unless they have a supply of R12 hidden somewhere.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe (Wa)

04-14-2002 20:33:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
Hi Brad, The difference is oil compatibility. The R12 system has mineral oil in the compressor/system and R134a compressor/system requires ester oil. Conversion of R12 to R134a requires flushing all the mineral oil out of the compressor and system to trace or less and recharging with ester oil and R134a. All other components of the system remain the same. In the mid 90s many conversions were made by just installing new compressors with ester oil (or just dumping and changing oil). This doesn�t work because up to 10% of the oil travels with the refrigerant in a properly functioning system. Put simply R12 will not work with ester oil, R134a will not work with mineral oil, and neither will work with more than a trace of the wrong oil. You can get away with changing just the gas short term depending on compressor condition and service demand, however, in the long run it will destroy the compressor and by debris ejection, the system. All other things being equal R134a is about 80% as efficient as R12 per lb circulated. Regards Joe

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Keith morris

04-14-2002 20:02:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
I have been using r134 in my 88 and 86 fords with no problem for a long time so i dont think you will have a problem be sure to add oil and stop leak and it will work



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mac

04-14-2002 19:18:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 19:09:56  
IMO, since it is a 92, I would try to stay with the older refrigerate, if you don't intend to keep vehicle very long. To convert and do it right is pretty costly. Have to weigh the cost against value of veh.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Brad

04-14-2002 22:33:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Mac, 04-14-2002 19:18:27  
Thanks for the replies so quickly guys. Actually the car is a '92 Geo Metro that I just acquired for $300. It has only 76,000 miles on it, and had new tires, a new alternator, good paint and extremely minor dents in the body work. I got it because it needed some engine work. The car wouldn't stay running, but it hadn't been started or even moved since August of 2000. I bought it, took it home gave it a much needed tune up, the original parts were still in it..... .plugs, wires, cap, rotor..... Anyway, bought really good parts for it and it now runs like a top. Doesn't burn oil either, (I wondered if it would when I bought it, since it wasn't running for me to check for it). I figured while I'm at it, I might as well recharge the AC system, and since I'm probably only going to keep the car for another 3 years, I was wondering if it would be worth it to change it over now, or probably just leave it. After reading your posts, it might just be worth it to charge it with the original stuff, R-12, as I don't think I would have the best of luck evacuating the old system out completly of the old oil after having read your posts.

I got the car for the daily commute, to school, for my last few years of college..... ..GAS MILEAGE!! Tell you what, the chicks sure give me wierd look, and laughs, when I unwrap myself from behind the steering wheel when I get out. Probably because I'm 6'5", and have a Kenworth bumpersticker on the back.

Thanks again.
Brad

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ff316

04-15-2002 11:58:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 22:33:56  
The thing about R12 is by the time you pay for a few cans it is sometimes as cheap to convert, including changing oil, seals, and vacuuming system down. If that costs more than recharging with R12 your mechanic is a crook. Best I remember R134A is about 5 bucks a can, oil probably 5-10 bucks. Seals may be a little higher on a Geo, on a lot of cars the seals are cheap too. Some "American" vehicles you can buy a kit for 15 bucks with seals, fittings, and oil. Good luck, Ernie

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T_Bone

04-15-2002 01:58:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: R-12, vs. R134A refrigerant.......... in reply to Brad, 04-14-2002 22:33:56  
Hi Brad,

There several new refrigerants that are a direct replacement for R12, R22, R134A, R500

R414B is all "oil" type compatible for R12

R416A is also all "oil" compatible and supposed to match R12 thermodynamic and physical properties

There is also some other replacement refrigerants but they require some costly cylinder deposits, $125/cyl

Keep in mind that I've never used any of these so called direct replacments so your on your own.
I can not tell you if you need a refrigeration license to buy them. Never hurts to ask tho!

T_Bone

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy