Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum
:

Comment about Oliver

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Mike

02-08-2000 23:07:21




Report to Moderator

Now that we pinpointed that the New Oliver Factoy should be in Charles City Iowa. And the fine people on the message board request for a quality American built, simple, rugged, dependable, easy to work on, reasonable priced tractor. How many models and configurations should we have? Horsepower range? What would they look like? Example: Checkerboad grill? Sloping tilt hood? White American? White Workhorses? Oliver 55 series? Oliver 1800 series A ? Numbering System I think continue where Oliver left off, 1560,1660, etc.

Oliver, later White made good combines. Especially the White 9700, 9720, and 9320 Rotary Harvest Boss combines. These combines were way ahead of their time in features,simplicity, and especially in capacity. The "little" White 9320 beats Current Case IH's and Deere's largest rotaty combine in capacity and in moving parts. The 9720 still has no real competiton except for Cat. The 9720 has the Cat beat by leaps and bounds in simplicity.

My question is, Why didn't White sell many of these great combines compaired to Deere and IH? Massey already builds the small White rotary why don't they start building the big White rotary combine?
White didn't call these combines HARVEST BOSS for nothing.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Pete in Ks.

02-10-2000 06:55:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Mike, 02-08-2000 23:07:21  
I've been reading the posts on reviving Oliver to glory. I can't help but look at what has caused the demise of so many companies that built tractors. When farming was a business that a man could make a decent living tilling the soil there was a high demand for tractors. As profits droped a farmer had to farm more acres which require larger equipment and the "catch 22" became firmly implanted in the soil of the farm. With more and more Older farmers retiring and fewer and fewer young men and women taking up the challenge I would not be surprised to see another of the big three going by the way side. I was told once that John Deere was still in business because of their construction line of equipment and not their farm equipment. Keith may be right start small in an area of high demand which is in the yuppy suburban market and restablish the name and a foundation to work from. The demand must be there.
I won't jump on a soap box here but it needs to be said. A fair market price for the product produced is a must for the American farmer to survive and for the companies that sell products to farmers to startup and remain in business.
Just my thoughts on the subject. I would like nothing more than to see the name revived. I love Olivers I own three a 1655, a 550 and an old 60. All are still in use. By the way I would buy stock.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Von WC Ohio

02-09-2000 18:12:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Mike, 02-08-2000 23:07:21  
Wow !

I didn't realize my remark below would cause so much interest in this. Of course my vote would be for the re-introduction of the 55 series as a starting point. Quite a few people have always said that JD should start making 4020's again. In my opinion the 55 series were already well ahead of the new generation JD's. I think many would like to own a simple yet efficient tractor that was easy to work on but was so reliable that it seldom needed to be. Studies, however, show that this line of thinking may not be entirely accurate. The JD Advantage series is supposed to be a bare bones simplified tractor but the sales figures are not all that great. There needs to be more to it than just a re-introduction for a nostalgic sake. Excellent parts availability, fair pricing and fast courteous service are key components for success. I am still amazed at how available Oliver parts are for my 1955 Super 77. There are other tractors that are newer by 10-15 years that parts are NLA (no longer available) for. Any chance that some of these molds for castings are still around or was everything destroyed after White took over and the Charles city plant was torn down ?

Sure would do my heart good to see a fine company like Oliver play the role of the Phoenix and rise from the ashes to compete with the others and give them a run for their money on practicality, durability and advances that are ahead of their time !

How much do you think the first shares are going to be sold for :-)


Von WC Ohio

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mike

02-09-2000 23:00:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Von WC Ohio, 02-09-2000 18:12:46  

I'm with you on the WOW!

I didn't think that I would stir up that much interest on the Subject of New White Tractors being built Overseas and the little comment about if Agco could build a tractor worthy of the Oliver name, at the begining of the week. Deere missed the point on the Advantage Series. (1) They don't offer a cab. (2) They didn't price them low enough, a 105 hp 7405 is roughly around $50,000, for a open station (no cab) 7410 is only about $5000-9000 more and it has all the toys. When a person spends this kind of money they are not afraid to spend a little more for the better tractor. Find the dealers that need a tractor line and dealers that dropped the White line. Offer good incentives to the new dealers. Ex: Free or 1/2 price on a demostrator tractor, free Adveristing.
Got to have a good parts,service,warrenty, and sales program for dealers. Weak dealer network leads to a weak company.

It's hard to tell what Allied Products did with this stuff especially when they moved the White tractors to Coldwater Ohio. If it was in the Charles City Plant up to 1993 it was probilly scrapped. I heard once when they were cleaning out the factoy before tearing it down they were pitching EVERYTHING, files of blueprints, paint codes, tractor build and shipping dates,production logs, pictures,tractor testing logs etc. Luckily it was OK for people fish out what they wanted out of the dumpsters. I also heard, back in the early to mid 70's White also threw away alot of Oliver blue prints on future projects and concepts that were drawn up back in the 1950's and were filed away for future reference because the ideas and designs were 20-40 years ahead of it's time. I guess some of these drawings kind of looked like the Case IH Magnums.

Here is my question. Was it Allied Products decision to knock down the Charles City Plant? Wouldn't surprise me any. Look at what they did to Kewanee farm equipment. They completly scrapped it. Or was it Agco that tore the plant down? I'm only 21 years old. My memory is kind of limited on this.

Need to get more people notified on the new Oliver Corperation. The more people we get shares out to. The more money we would get to start out with, and maybe the shares will get cheaper.

Any Comments?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JD-8

02-09-2000 15:33:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Mike, 02-08-2000 23:07:21  
Highboy is right. We must start with tractors and maybe work back into combines later. As far as styling-- I believe form follows function, and the cheapest way we could make it functional and still look decent is the best way. I believe we should go in 10-hp increments from 25-65 hp, then in 15 hp increments from 65- 125, then 25's after that, and 50's or 60's in the big 4-wheel-drives. Yes, we must have simple, quality, inexpensive, US-built tractors once more.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
highboyford dealer and parts

02-09-2000 13:32:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Mike, 02-08-2000 23:07:21  
Around here the local JD outfit will get you parts by 7:00 am if you call by 7:00pm the night before and in your field to boot.Needless to say not to many other tractor companies can compete with them right now time is everything.We had a brand new 9700 and a slightly used 7700 both were good machines but in mop the JD head was a little bettor.As far as the best I dont know I know the Masseys are a pain to work on (510 and up)I.H does the best job in corn but the JD is bettor overall,never ran a silver seeder,uni harvestors are all right as long as you get one with a perkins(look out for the fire hazard of the GM big v6)Wasnt the big white a massey first and white bought the combine when massey was in trouble the first time?Only good thing you can say about the N.H is they start good in the cold(cat v8)If it was my company I would stay out of the combines at over $200,000.00 a piece a tad high for a start up company.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
WFE

02-09-2000 09:33:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Mike, 02-08-2000 23:07:21  
Mike,

Good questions. I guess we need some market analysts (probably from Deere because they sure know how to sell anything) to tell us what to build. Personally, I would give the American series another try. But this time, add a 100 and 120 to the line-up with 6 cylinder Cummins engines. Keep all the same options such as cab, ROPS, FWA, etc., and put syncronizers in the transmission. Despite my genuine desire to bring back the Oliver engines, jointly manufactured in Waukesha, WI, I think this would be difficult since the molds for the blocks and other castings no longer exist. I would love to bring back those Oliver engines (the 310, in a new improved version of course with all necessary improvements, the 283, what a beautiful diesel engine, and some gas versions too, the 265). As for big tractors, I would begin with the first Workhorse tractors. They were rugged, simple, yet had some of the modern electronics that most farmers would not be willing to sacrifice in a simpler tractor. Cummins engines throughout the line-up, with, again, syncronized transmissions coupled with the Over/Under. As far as I'm concerned, everything else was fine. Only add a new Workhorse 225 model with 225 pto hp. I'd love to see the 1800 or the 1655 make a reappearance, this time with CCLS hydraulics, a flat platform, and an undermount axle. Now for the combines. The White 9700/9720/9320, I agree, were simply the best combines ever made. They still are under the MF nameplate. But to have such a machine in the late 1970s, only to have to try to sell them in the 80s during the recession is a tragedy. Anyone who claims any other company built a better combine has obviously never seen these machines in action. I would have to agree that we would also have to buy back the rights to the White rotary combines and resurrect them. Tragically, they were simply too much combine for most farmers, I think. And in the 80s, if farmers could afford a new combine, too many bought the worst on the market, the Deere conventionals. Boy, were they wrong. All for now before I start going off the handle again at those OTHER green tractors. Good comments.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Richard

02-10-2000 06:19:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to WFE, 02-09-2000 09:33:37  
The engines are still available. Waukesha sold the VR "Very Reliable" Engine series to Arrow Specialty Company located in Tulsa Oklahoma. 800-331-3662. I have to admit they seemed to have doubled their engine prices. A VRD283 New Short Block is now $10,400 when 5 years ago I could buy a complete engine for $6,000 and some change.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Keith

02-09-2000 17:28:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to WFE, 02-09-2000 09:33:37  
This was a good idea. It just seems like everyones getting that Tim Taylor additude(MORE POWER). I as a stockholder would recomended just the opposite. Look at all these Imports. The Yanmars and such. Why not start out giving the 44,&55's a facelift. Keep things simple. How about a 4wd 44? Start getting a name for reliability. Just seems to me here in Ohio there are fewer and fewer farms and a hellava lot of ten acre estates or mini farms that could use these type tractors. Thats why I have become interested in Olivers again. It's what My Grand father used.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dsl

02-09-2000 19:45:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Keith, 02-09-2000 17:28:08  
I think a 550 Diesel tractor would be an excellent choice to re-introduce in North America, and a four wheel drive version, if it could be inexpensively engineered, would be a great little tractor. Both models would be well suited to the rapidly growing number of 'sustenence' farms.

A 44/440? Yes, maybe, but a Diesel version would have to be designed, and from the ground up, probably pushing it out of the 'inexpensive' range.

I liked the idea down the board of the new model designations just starting back in where they left off--as 60 series--that would really be something to see!

third party image

I would work, fingers to the bone hard, for free, to see such happen, as long as I got my one real wish, and was allowed a Cockshutt variant to sell here in Canada again....gleaming Sumac Red, and soothing Clover White....ohhh....be still, my heart...


Alrighty then--who's got about 25 million bucks so we can git started?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mongo

02-09-2000 17:36:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Comment about Oliver in reply to Keith, 02-09-2000 17:28:08  
Call them "Classics" and market them against the 8N knock offs. They were better then and would be better now.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy