Mike, Eminent Domain has its pluses as well as its minuses. On one side, without eminent domain, there wouldn't be any railroads, highways, parks, things like that. You are right though. On the other side, it can cost people plenty, sometimes supposedly but not really for the public good. The city in your case, is probably looking at increased tax revenues that a shopping center would bring. Typically, single family homes use up much more in city revenues and services than they contribute in taxes. Businesses on the other hand typically pay much more in taxes then they ever get back from the city in services. That is why cities usually court businesses with tax breaks. It helps the city's financial balance. Hard to say what the city's motivation is in this case. Could be they are hard strapped for cash and wanted to boost the city coffers. The businesses will probably create jobs and those people will hopefully be good tax paying citizens. The businesses will probably chip in to make the roads in the area better (in their own interest of course). The businesses will probably create jobs too though so in the end, it helps the public good. Can't say what the reasoning is in this case, but its usually to most everyone's benefit...except those that get booted out of course.
|