Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum
:

MF135 vs 35

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Scott

01-03-2001 02:16:53




Report to Moderator

Hi All,
I am an absolute newbie when it comes to tractors. (Hence I do have a local farmer who has taken me under his wing and is starting to explain the differences)
I have 10 acres, half of which sits on the side of a hill (steep enough that you are out of breath when climbing it. Although I'm not that fit) and is clear of trees and half of which is reasonably flat but is heavily wooded. I require a tractor with front end loader capability (I'm sick of pushing a wheelbarrow) which I can use for slashing/grading and general landscaping uses. I have been recommended either a MF35 or 135. In Australia the 35 prices from $1-5.5K and the 135 $5-10K ($AUS). My budget could probably stretch to the 135 if it is worth spending the extra. Question is, what is the difference between the 2 and for my uses is it worth spending the extra.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Dick

01-03-2001 08:30:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Scott , 01-03-2001 02:16:53  
Both are excellent machines.Don't buy a 4 cylinder 35 - they are bad starters
Buy a 35 with a diff lock if possible especially for a loader.
Replacement tinwork is expensive- look for a good one.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dick

01-03-2001 08:30:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Scott , 01-03-2001 02:16:53  
Both are excellent machines.Don't buy a 4 cylinder 35 - they are bad starters
Buy a 35 with a diff lock if possible especially for a loader.
Replacement tinwork is expensive- look for a good one.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chip

01-03-2001 05:22:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Scott , 01-03-2001 02:16:53  
I agree completely with Jack in NB, you won't regret the Perkins diesel, I would suggest a tractor with power steering for loader work.

Good luck



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chip

01-03-2001 05:20:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Scott , 01-03-2001 02:16:53  
I agree completely with Jack in NB, you won't regret the Perkins diesel, I would suggest a tractor with power steering for loader work.

Good luck



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jack in NB

01-03-2001 04:51:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Scott , 01-03-2001 02:16:53  
Hi Scott -

The 35 and 135 are basically the same tractor. The 135 has more stylish tin, a somewhat upgraded 3-point with constant pumping, and a slightly newer engine in the Perkins diesel (direct injection rather than regular injection - 2 - 3 more hp and a bit easier starting), none of which help you much in your proposed applications.

The 135 has a slightly stronger front end, but if you keep the bucket on the loader small and load under 500 lb, you won't need power steering and the tractor will handle the load without strain or front end damage.

Watch those hillsides, though, with the loader! You might consider widening the wheel spacing and loading the rear tires for added stability.

The Perkins A3 and AD3 are still among the most fuel-efficient engines running, parts for both engine and chassis are readily available, and cheaper than most because of the numbers of the tractors still around. The tractors have their quirks (fuel leaks, gearshift locking, water in the transmission) but they are easy to repair, and there's a wealth of helpful info available from the folks here on this website!

Look for a 3 cylinder Perkins diesel engine and a two stage clutch (this gives you a live PTO; third letter M rather than F on the serial number tag - if indeed it's still in place). The 4 cylinder Standard was also a good engine, but hard to start, and some parts are getting scarce. A differential lock can be helpful, but may be stripped from improper operation.

Don't know how you zeroed in on the MF as your choice, but it's a good decision. I had the same good luck over 25 years ago, and never looked back. My first 35 fitted like a tailor-made suit! We're now running nearly a dozen - 35 through 30 industrial, and they've all proven solid, although the larger units have nowhere near the simplicity of the 40-year-old basic 35.

In my humble opinion, the 35 is one of the world's truly GREAT tractors.
Good luck!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave C.

01-03-2001 11:15:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Jack in NB, 01-03-2001 04:51:58  
I've got a 60's vintage MF 35 industrial with Massey loader and 3 point etc. Have had it for 17 years and love it. Simple, handy,reliable and has never (knock on wood) had the need for more than minor parts. Its got a 4 cylinder gas engine which has never let me down. I use it for moving snow here in Wisconsin and it has always started in an unheated shed with no engine heater, even below zero F. Also use it with 3 point brush hog and have no complaints.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave C.

01-03-2001 11:13:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Jack in NB, 01-03-2001 04:51:58  
I've got a 60's vintage MF 35 industrial with Massey loader and 3 point etc. Have had it for 17 years and love it. Simple, handy,reliable and has never (knock on wood) had the need for more than minor parts. Its got a 4 cylinder gas engine which has never let me down. I use it for moving snow here in Wisconsin and it has always started in an unheated shed with no engine heater, even below zero F. Also use it with 3 point brush hog and have no complaints.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jack in NB

01-03-2001 04:43:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Scott , 01-03-2001 02:16:53  
Hi Scott -

The 35 and 135 are basically the same tractor. The 135 has more stylish tin, a somewhat upgraded 3-point with constant pumping, and a slightly newer engine in the Perkins diesel (direct injection rather than regular injection - 2 - 3 more hp and a bit easier starting), none of which help you much in your proposed applications.

The 135 has a slightly stronger front end, but if you keep the bucket on the loader small and load under 500 lb, you won't need power steering and the tractor will handle the load without strain or front end damage.

Watch those hillsides, though, with the loader! You might consider widening the wheel spacing and loading the rear tires for added stability.

The Perkins A3 and AD3 are still among the most fuel-efficient engines running, parts for both engine and chassis are readily available, and cheaper than most because of the numbers of the tractors still around. The tractors have their quirks (fuel leaks, gearshift locking, water in the transmission) but they are easy to repair, and there's a wealth of helpful info available from the folks here on this website!

Look for a 3 cylinder Perkins diesel engine and a two stage clutch (this gives you a live PTO; third letter M rather than F on the serial number tag - if indeed it's still in place). The 4 cylinder Standard was also a good engine, but hard to start, and some parts are getting scarce. A differential lock can be helpful, but may be stripped from improper operation.

Don't know how you zeroed in on the MF as your choice, but it's a good decision. I had the same good luck over 25 years ago, and never looked back. My first 35 fitted like a tailor-made suit! We're now running nearly a dozen - 35 through 30 industrial, and they've all proven solid, although the larger units have nowhere near the simplicity of the 40-year-old basic 35.

In my humble opinion, the 35 is one of the world's truly GREAT tractors.
Good luck!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Glenn

01-05-2001 00:16:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: MF135 vs 35 in reply to Jack in NB, 01-03-2001 04:43:48  
Scott- I guess I'm exactly where you are right now. I've got about 8 acres to work, including 2 in pasture for my wife's two horses. We recently moved them here from a boarding stable after clearing the pasture acreage with the help of one friend and his Ford 8N and another buddy with his John Deere 1010. Both seemed like good tractors and got me looking into purchasing my own. The more I looked and asked questions, though, the more I liked the 35/135's. They are heavier, appear more solidly built, have more horsepower and better features( power steering, live PTO etc.) Now all I have to do is find one in my price range! Here's wishing us both luck. By the way, I asked a friend who works as a John Deere heavy (construction) equipment technician to ask the older men he works with what they thought I should get for what I'll be doing and they suggested I get a Massey-Ferguson 35. How's that for a recommendation! Good luck! Glenn

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy