Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Massey Harris & Massey Ferguson Tractors Discussion Forum
:

285 vs. 1085

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
KYfarm

07-21-2007 18:03:25




Report to Moderator

lets just say a guy was a massey fan, then lets say a guy wanted to add another tractor to do work that his 1105 was just a little bit to big for. this fellow decides that he needs about an 85HP machine and sees that both the 285 and 1085 get alot of good reports on this forum and are readily available and somewhat affordable. About the only real difference you can tell between the two from tractordata is the 4000 pounds of steel the 285 doesn't have, both have the 318 4 cylinder.

Other than the weight, what is the real difference between the two machines?

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
MC in KY

07-23-2007 08:17:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to KYfarm, 07-21-2007 18:03:25  
I purchased a MF 1085 last year to help with hay work but looked at several 285"s as well. I choose the 1085 since it was a little heavier tractor and several thousand dollars cheaper. I do like the added weight on my KY hills with the round baler and it works very well with an 8" disc mower. I have even pulled our JD 336 square baler with no problems turning the tight corners.

What part of KY are you in?

Hope this helps.

MC

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
KYfarm

07-23-2007 17:29:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to MC in KY, 07-23-2007 08:17:12  
I'm in Spencer Co., just south of L'ville. Is pretty hilly here, when I bought my 1105, I chose to get one without the multi-power because I don't like the idea of free-wheeling downhill when in low.

However, I am pretty intersted in a 1085, just not sure how interested the wife is in tractor number 4..... ..... ..



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MC in KY

07-24-2007 06:03:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to KYfarm, 07-23-2007 17:29:04  
I know what you mean, that is the one thing that I don't care for on the MF multi-power. However, I have found that when baling I can usally find a gear in high that will work.

I am in Ohio Co. south of Owensboro, and my wife usally has the same response with my tractors and horses... she says I can only ride one at a time anyway, so why do you need more than one????

good luck,



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
make mine a massey

07-22-2007 15:50:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to KYfarm, 07-21-2007 18:03:25  
Got 2 1085,s and a 285 cab model. Love that 318, easy on fuel. I use the 1085 for cutting, easy to see way up there in cab, enough room for half the family, pull 24 ft V rake with 1085 number 2, bit of overkill, but throttle down and gear up, run half day on gallon of fuel, 285 does the grunt work on round baler, not so far to get down from, all 3 turn on a dime, start in all kinds of weather and don't oew me a thing. To me it comes down to condition and price, buy what suits your needs and your pocket book, if you're thinking of a loader, go with the 285, easier to find one that fits

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]

07-22-2007 05:48:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to KYfarm, 07-21-2007 18:03:25  
The 1085 is the platform model and the 285 is the utility version of feet on either side of the shifter. The 1085 has saddle tanks and more fuel capacity. Turning radius is near the same on either. 18.4x34 tires are popular on both.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Don-Wi

07-21-2007 23:37:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to KYfarm, 07-21-2007 18:03:25  
third party image

Christos said it. The 285 is a lower profile utility type model, and the 1085 is a higher up row-crop model. Really the same basic tractor though. We've got a 285 and we've had it since about 82. It's a great machine, well built, and relatively low maintnance.

Both can be open station or cab, although I see more cabs on the 1085 than the 285. The 285 is small enough to get around with, where I just think the 1085 would be a little bit more cumbersome out in the field and may not be as manuverable. I may be way off on that, but it's my opinion.

Thay're about 85 HP on a strong engine. We just had ours in-frameded this spring and there's definately a little more reserve there than last year. We used to use it to plow and do all the heavy field work, but now we've got an Oliver 1855 that we use and use some bigger equipment now to get done sooner(we work off the farm as well so time is very short) The 285 is very easy on fuel also. Can run all day plus on one tank doing hay.

Donovan from Wisconsin

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Christos

07-21-2007 22:37:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to KYfarm, 07-21-2007 18:03:25  
From what I understand the 285 was a utility version and the 1085 was the row crop version



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
marlowe

07-21-2007 18:30:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to KYfarm, 07-21-2007 18:03:25  
i would get the 1085 because of the open station and a little longer wheel base and just a little heaver built. but the 285 is also real good just i like the 1085 better



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
BigMarv1085

07-26-2007 17:27:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: 285 vs. 1085 in reply to marlowe, 07-21-2007 18:30:27  
I have had a 1085 for 15 years. With the bigger front tires it makes for a comfortable ride. Very easy to work on. A little weak on the hyd.s.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy