35 vs. 135--Is one better than the other?

Uses: Maintaining 1,200 ft. gravel driveway, plowing snow once every 5 yrs., cultivating, tilling, & dragging a log out of the woods now & then.

Thanks

Richard Scott

I have no experience with the gas versions. Recently I have heard of a problem with these that makes some people cautious with buying them, but I do not remember the exact reason. I know the gas versions sell for less. But in cold weather they would sure start easier.

Overall these are both very dependable and practical tractors. They are a little light for carrying round bales unless you use front weights. The 2040 might do better at that. But for the light work you'll be doing they would both be great.

Yeah it's on the low end for size, but it'll do fine...just keep your mind on what you're doing.

Mark

We have both. 4 - 35 Perkins, 3 - 135 Perkins. The 35 does almost everything the 135 does, and I think it does it cheaper.

While the 135 looks more stylish, it's basically the same tractor as the 35, with some refinements in the internal hydraulics. These refinements (constant pumping, a few other bells and whistles) seem to be harder for us backyard mechanics to keep in tune. And those bells don't improve productivity in the jobs you mention.

The 135 has a later style Perkins diesel (direct injection) that has a bit more muscle and a tad better fuel efficiency, but generally costs a thou more on the used tractor market.

For my money, the 35 with the Perkins is one of, if not THE, best tractors ever built.

Just look at the number still around, and the availability of economical aftermarket parts.....!

My 3 cents (2 cents US with exchange!)