Hi Sherlock, Thanks for the reply. I have just been given a copy of the MF65 Operators Instruction Book which is supposed to be the original manual for my tractor, but there is no absolute proof of this. It is very old and being priced at the old 3 shillings and 6 pence it has to be pre decimal currency in the UK. Everything in this book relates exactly to my tractor (which I am told is a Mark II????) so I guess, as you suggested, it is at least a relative of the 65. I'm still not sure what the MF-765 on the data plate means although I've found what appears to be a UK web site,www.fofh.u-net.com, which lists the 'MF 65(765)' Maybe it's a designation relative only to British manufacture. I appreciate your reference to the prefix codes in the serial numbers. I had no idea such a system existed. As you point out mine actually is Hi clearance, diesel, direct injection(I think), with a differential lock and a dual clutch - thus the CNDY but no M. The book states "Engine:Made by Perkins to MF specifications"(no specific model listed), "Engine Type:Compression ignition, direct injection, toroidal cavity in piston crown" and "Cubic Capacity: 203.5 cu. in. (3335c.c.)". I don't really know if this is fitted to my tractor. The UK web site notes the AD4-203 fitted to the MF65(765) from 1960 to 1965 but lists no engine numbers. As you suggested my injector tops do slant outwards a bit so it looks like we might have the engine right and if the engine numbering is similar in both countries it would put it in the 1963/64 ballpark along with the UK serial number (maybe I'm rationalising a bit here). Again, on the UK site, the tractor serial numbers/year of manufacture are listed as starting at 500001 in 1958, increasing by about 10000 per annum until 1961 then each year by approx. 20000 to the end of 1964 with the last number at 614024. If correct for my tractor it would put it early 1964 but would suggest a different numbering system between the USA And UK as 1960 is given as 520569 - 533179. Your S/N 678811 is of course listed as 1960 on this ytmag.com site. A few questions still remain but hopefully they'll be resolved. Thanks again for sharing what you know. The Brits on the other hand seem a bit coy with free and open discussion on their site. Regards, Eric
|