Alright, I got the newer serial number bearings in. The O.D. is too small. Here are the specs that I have. New cup - JD7448 - OD 5.250" - 1.030" Thick - Bower #47620 Old cup - JD7434 - OD 5.500" - 1.127" Thick - Timken #47621The new cones I ordered were correct, right down to the Timken part number. I went back to the parts book and looked again for anything else that might have changed. I still don't see what it could be. The similarity in the Timken and Bower part numbers is interesting. If I could get a Bower #47621, would that be correct? The guy at the bearing outfit said only Timken and SKS still make this bearing, but maybe he just wanted to sell me $1200 worth of bearings. I'm sure somebody in the distant or recent past has run into this dilemma. The idea we're kicking around now is to have sleeves machined to take up the .250" difference in the O.D. We fitted one of the new styled cups to one of the new cones and it seems to fit very well, the rollers cover the entire surface of the cup, unlike the original cups. I'm wondering if these new cups were just boxed wrong - I'm going to get on JD Point and check the specs of the new cups, they could be wrong. Does anyone have a #48400 and up rear end housing laying around to measure the I.D. of the axle tube where the bearing fits? I can't believe they would have changed to a smaller cup, especially since I can't see a difference in the parts book. Anyway, I'm rambling on here, so if anyone has a bearing book (I know you do Clooney), or any other info source, I would sure appreciate the help. Thanks in advance, G-MAN.
|