Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum
:

JD M?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Don n TN

07-10-2001 10:21:10




Report to Moderator

I have had modern JD equipment for years and lately I have got the itch for a popper but I'm not sure which one. I don't really have the time to restore one of these now even though that does appeal to me and I'm pretty decent with tools, so I guess I want to buy one restored or in really good condition. Where I live is pretty hilly (middle Tennessee)and I need my tractors to have a wide front end so that cuts the selection down some. The JD B's are really neat but the BW is somewhat rare/expensive from what I have heard. The M looks to be overall the best choice in my case as far as I can tell. If I go looking for an M what should I look for (good or bad)? Were there any real problems or weaknesses with this model? Are there any comparable JD models I should be looking at also? Know of any of these in the middle Tennessee area?
Is there anything else I should know about buying a popper?
Thanks,
Don

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Richard

07-12-2001 21:56:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD M? in reply to Don n TN, 07-10-2001 10:21:10  
I love questions like your's. I'm an MT owner (row crop version of the M)and have some pastures that make me nervous to take the MT across. Well, I agree with the others, that you would really like a newer Dubuque tractor like the 40, 420 or 430. What you haven't heard from the others is that these models, produced in Deere's Dubuque plant vs all the others made at Waterloo, are in my mind some of the best Deere has produced. Experts say, when tuned, they run like well oiled sewing machines. They had a little higher rpm than the Waterloo's. They also have verticle two cylinder engines and a foot clutch, where as the Waterloo tractors had horizontal cylinders and hand lever clutches. Since so many were made, they are relatively plentiful, easy to find. Here in Missouri, an M, in reasonable condition will bring 2000.00 to 3500.00 If you go with an M, I'm sure you will enjoy using it, I use an after market 3 point on the MT, but have also obtained some implements made for the M series tractors. (plow and sickle mower). I just used the 3 point and a pto driven post hole digger on the 4th to drill launch sites for a fireworks display. These M series tractors are over 50 years old and can still produce results of a 24,000.00 dollar tractor. Just my thoughts.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
adamHpopper

07-10-2001 20:23:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD M? in reply to Don n TN, 07-10-2001 10:21:10  

Maybe a 40 or 420 is something to your liking



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan

07-10-2001 20:17:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD M? in reply to Don n TN, 07-10-2001 10:21:10  
Guess a lot depends upon what you want to do with it, and the power you need to do it. There are a lot of JDs in the wide front mode that have a relatively low center of gravity such as the 40, 420, 430 etc. I have an MT which is a great little tractor for small jobs but wouldn't really want to take it on slopes. I also have a 430 u that works great. The advantage of a 40, 420 etc is that most have 3 point standard on them whereas the M was sometimes converted. The 3 point makes it more universal.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ralph

07-10-2001 20:02:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD M? in reply to Don n TN, 07-10-2001 10:21:10  
I would go with an A or B. I'm not convinced you need a wide front. I clip pasture for my brother with an tricycle A, disk wheels and the back wheels out wide (cultivator width) which is the common configuration. I have been on slopes I would not consider with a M JD unless the rear wheels were out to the maximum which is not the common configuration. I would not venture out these slopes with his 860 Ford either unless the wheels were out wide which they have not been for 30 years. Cast wheels should increase stability and rollomatic or not is probably a tossup. Truth is neither of us should be on slopes this steep with any tractor.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy