Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum
:

JD and CASE comparison

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Dan

03-21-2000 19:13:00




Report to Moderator

A few of us was wandering a 20' field cultivator is kind of a load for a 4020 As far as how hard it is being worked. Would a 970 case pull it a little bit easier and not be worked as hard or would a 1070 be better. since the case engine has a bigger stroke. Or would a 4320 be better?
P.S. Give me your true feeling everyone. this is to settle a little Case/JD war. THANKS!




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
G Taylor

03-31-2000 03:18:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD and CASE comparison in reply to Dan, 03-21-2000 19:13:00  
Tractor condition is important as well. How do the tractors test on the dyno? Does any require for work to get rated power?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
G Taylor

03-31-2000 03:16:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD and CASE comparison in reply to Dan, 03-21-2000 19:13:00  
Apples & oranges comparison. What were the shipping weights , tire size & type and horsepower of each ?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan

04-02-2000 18:29:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: JD and CASE comparison in reply to G Taylor, 03-31-2000 03:16:16  
I believe everything is about the same as far as wieght and HP and tire size. The only real big difference is The case has a bigger sroke engine than a JD, That is one thing I like about case more than anything is that extra stroke.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan

03-22-2000 19:35:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD and CASE comparison in reply to Dan, 03-21-2000 19:13:00  
Hey everyone thanks for your help. But I forgot to put on the disk. It is a 14-1/2' plow disk its the heaviest thing I have ever seen I think it was made for the 4320 jd. This thing really works the 4020 but it does pull it in 3rd and 4th gear. Would a 970 possibly be able to pull it easier and faster? Thanks!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Greg H.

03-22-2000 06:17:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD and CASE comparison in reply to Dan, 03-21-2000 19:13:00  
From what I've seen of the case 970 and 1070 I'm pretty impressed. Between the 970 and the 4020, the 4020 might stand a chance depending on tire set up and ballast. The 1070 with the turbo is a whole other animal, and I couldn't think that a 4020 could match the ground speed of the Case 1070. But I realy don't think one should expect it to. It's apples and oranges. The 4320 on the other hand is longer, a little heavier, with more Horse Power. I have never seen a 4320 out working, so i don't know how they would compare to the case's, but it seem to me that the 4320 would be a better comparison, than the 4020. Maybe a 4620 would even be a better comparison tractor. I don't know. Anyhow they're all good tractors. Greg H.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Glenn R.

03-22-2000 05:46:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD and CASE comparison in reply to Dan, 03-21-2000 19:13:00  
My dad had a 4020 d and a 1032 d Case, both in about the same condition, tires, etc. The Case seemed to do better in heavy soils and with heavy load when he used it, as well as now, but it didn't have as fine a touch, as you would expect, as the 4020 is simply a smaller tractor, although with better systems. The 1070 might have improved on the "Comfort King" systems, and I still use the 1032 for those things where straight pulling is required. I've stuck the 4020, and the Case has got it out of trouble, I don't know what would happen if the Case ever gets stuck. But if I had to sell one of them, it would be the Case.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mike Aylward

03-21-2000 20:07:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD and CASE comparison in reply to Dan, 03-21-2000 19:13:00  
Dan, I would think your 4020 should pull a 20' field cultivator at normal depths. I have two 4020's- a '64 and a '71. They both very capably pull my 22 1/2' John Deere 1010 field cultivator in fourth gear anywhere I want to go. (No, they are not turboed). Obviously the bigger tractors would pull it better (faster), but your 4020 should be capable of a 20 footer. Hope this helps. Mike



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy