Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

John Deere Tractors Discussion Forum
:

Baker Fan

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
720Deere

10-30-2003 15:54:35




Report to Moderator

I am still researching the baker fan. Does not look like a difficult proposition to build one, but I would like to have the exact paddle dimensions and pulley size to mimic the original. I guess it would not matter because with a little bit of advanced math, horsepower calculations could be made based on any paddle/pulley combination. Anyway, I stumbled upon a web site selling a machinist book of projects. Among these are a baker fan. Below is the link if anyone is interested in purchasing the book, it's $39.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Duane Larson

10-30-2003 16:29:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Baker Fan in reply to 720Deere, 10-30-2003 15:54:35  
Most of Rudy's books I am familiar with relate to model building, including steam engines, so I would expect the plans to be for a scale model Baker fan to be used with one of his scale model steam engines.

As suggested earlier, I assume the Baker fan was originated by the Baker company for testing their steam engines. Steam engines have much larger drive pulley's than our tractors, and generated more hp than many tractors with pulley's. I'm not sure how well a Baker fan built to original specs would work for a JD 720, for example. Several shows have them, and some experience from them regarding paddle and drive pulley size might be quite valuable to keep from re-inventing the wheel. My 0.02 only.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob-Wyo

10-30-2003 19:46:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Duane Larson, 10-30-2003 16:29:59  
Duane I have a set of plans some where, as I built a minne just for my model steam traction engine to run. It's about 8"x6"x8" or so.
On the big ones it's not so much the size of the paddles as it is th size of the pulley. 12" will stop R's and 830's in there tracks, and have seen one that had 6" x24" paddles do the same. Thats why the ones around here went to tires, it's easy to find and change tire & wheel size. The one of mine in the Tractor Photos is a 11L x 15 tire and will put a pretty good load at almost WOT on anything we've had on it, but a 11L x 14 would really load them up.Great for tuning, seating rings, breaking in and burning the crud out of them.
Just my .02
Bob

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
BJ

10-30-2003 16:51:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Duane Larson, 10-30-2003 16:29:59  
One thing you have to remember about a steam engine is most were set to run around 250 RPM's so that is the reason for the large diameter drive pulley so it all kind of evens out when you get down to a 12" pulley running at 975-1125 RPM's



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
720Deere

10-30-2003 16:47:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Duane Larson, 10-30-2003 16:29:59  
That is exactly the logic that I am trying to follow at this point. It appears that the baker fan "standard" is 24" x 24" blades with a fan diameter of 60" and a 19" pulley. In my research, I have also found that a JD G can barely turn this size fan with a 29" pulley at 1/2 speed. It would not make much sense to build one that would take a 100 hp tractor to turn! The general belief is that the hp required to double the speed of the fan is a factor of at least 4 (275 rpm @ 30 hp = 550 rpm @ 120 hp). I am looking into several active fans at semi-local clubs to check the blade and pulley size and get some opinions on how tractors handle them. I would like to build one that requires somewhere around 70 - 75 hp to run 540 rpm. Maybe a design that allows for 2 of the paddles to be removable would allow it to be used for say a JD H or IH C up to a JD 80-830 or IH 650.

Sorry for the long post, just thinking out loud.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
phil

10-31-2003 08:19:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to 720Deere, 10-30-2003 16:47:24  
My JD H turned a Baker fan at 275 rpm. Because the H pulley runs off of the camshaft, the motor was running at 550. It was a good way to tweak the carb & the timing. As someone mentioned, the RPM varies with HP Cubed. On the same fan that my 15 HP turned 275 rpm, a 90 HP tractor turned it at 500 rpm. I don't think you would need to remove blades - following the same equation, even a 7.5 HP engine would turn the fan at at 218 rpm.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

10-30-2003 18:40:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to 720Deere, 10-30-2003 16:47:24  
720:

\\\\Maybe a design that allows for 2 of the paddles to be removable would allow it to be used for say a JD H or IH C up to a JD 80-830 or IH 650.\\\

How about some type of sliding panel arrangement so that you could adjust the panel surface area depending on the power input. (big panel=high hp tractor, small panel= small tractor). Just slide the panels out a few inches at a time using stop pins. Ideal would be a governor operated slat affair wo that the fan rpm would add panel surface area as it attained overspeed, and trim it back at underspeed.

Also, I've been doing some research on the Prony Brake type of dynamometer. I'm wondering if these might actually be a bit easier to build.

I looked at the rearend of my VAC Case tractor today, and pondered this design:

Take a junk VAC, transmission on back, strip the tires from the rims. Build two wooden block strap brakes for the rims. These would be tied together through a linkage, and then to a scale if torque readings are desired. The differential would make certain the brakes were loaded equally (the lighter turning wheel would try to turn faster, drag harder and slow until it "equalled" the load of the other wheel).

Two plastic tanks, like tire leak testing tanks, would be provided under each wheel, and would allow the rim to dip about 15-20% into the weater bath for cooling.

Now you input the power through the transmission driven powershaft at the rear. You could shift the transmission through any of the four gears to provide ranges of load if required. The direction would be reversed because of the pto rotation, but that shouldn't matter, as the gears will still lube.

Now, I'm curious if the rims will stay on the five point mounts of the wheel/rim connection? There should only be the same perimeter loading equivalent to about double or triple of the nromal tractor pulling in the field as you shift it into higher gears for more powerful tractors, and I think the rear-end could stand that.

Now help me out guys, am I missing something here? Of course, just about any tranny driven pto/rearend would do (Massey, WD-45, etc).

This is the direction I'm heading at the moment.

Anxious for input.

Frank

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

10-30-2003 22:00:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-30-2003 18:40:12  
Use a large hydraulic pump, with a water cooling system. Close a valve to restrict the pump output to load down the tractor. Determine HP by restricting rotation of the pump case with a torque arm suspended from an appropriatly sized scale.

I seem to recall reading some years ago of injury or property damage caused by a Baker fan shedding blades. If you decide to build one, be sure the blades are capable of handling the loads caused by dissipating your 70 + horsepower.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

10-31-2003 07:29:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Bob, 10-30-2003 22:00:55  
Bob:

Well, you just described a commercial variety hydraulic dynamometer like those sold by M & W. The problem with recreating that device is the high cost of the pump. For example:

If 1 horsepower = 33,000 FT-LBS/Minute, and hydraulically, it�s pressure X volume, you get:


Lbs/Sq In X Gallons/Minute = Lbs/Sq Inches X Gallons (231 Cu inches/Gallon)/Minute = Lb-Inches/minute.

12 inch-lbs = 1 foot pound, therefore divide the equation above by 12 to get ft-lbs/min.

I want to be able to test up to 100 hp, so I�ll need to handle 3,300,000 FT-LBS/minute, or 39,600,000 IN-LBS/min. Working backwards, I get, at 2000 psi, a required pump size of 85 GPM at 2000 PSI, and here�s the important thing�..at 540 RPM. I think a pump that large will be hard to come by. Remember as you drop the rpms, you need an even bigger pump, so you can�t just take one off of a junked 5020 that normally ran at engine speed of 2500 rpm without dividing it�s output by around 5. OR, you have to build a very rugged speed increasing transmission to get the pumnp upto it's speed of 2500.

Any ideas where I can find a pump that big?

That�s why we�re kicking around alternatives.

Frank

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

10-31-2003 10:59:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-31-2003 07:29:00  
One possibility would be a hydrostatic pump off of an old combine. We had a 760 Massey that would darn near kill the V-8 Perkins when you bogged it down in high gear, then the belts driving the hydrostatic pump would slip.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

10-31-2003 11:30:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Bob, 10-31-2003 10:59:44  
H-m-m-m-m-m.

Does a pump like that mount up by the motor, and then it is belt driven? I never worked around a h-stat combine, though my compact tractor is a h-stat. Belt driven might make it eaier to configure.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

11-02-2003 00:52:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-31-2003 11:30:02  
I have seen hydrostatic pumps mounted direct, or belt driven. Generally, they have heavy tapered roller bearings on the input shaft, so either drive system should work.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
720Deere

10-30-2003 19:43:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-30-2003 18:40:12  
There has to be a name for this disease that we all seem to have. We all spend a ton of money and time restoring our old beasts, then we sit around and try to find the most cost effective, efficient way to work the ever loving snot out of them. It may be twisted, but man do I love it!
Frank, you have some pretty good ideas. All the bells and whistles may get a little too costly for some "good ol' boy engineering". Even if it is turning the baker fan concept into a space shuttle, I always look forward to your comments.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

10-30-2003 19:48:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to 720Deere, 10-30-2003 19:43:15  
720:

You said exactly what my wife said! She said, "You mean you fixed it up, and now you're trying to intentionally wear it out?"

City girl..... .Ha!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
720Deere

10-30-2003 19:54:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-30-2003 19:48:09  
I believe the pursuit of tractor killing tasks will always occupy the time of all boys young and old. I have an uncle that has a 4020 and a 4320, yet every year he tries to pull the 10 tooth chisel plow with a 2640. It's not because he has to, I guess he just wants to make it earn it's keep. It's just fun to see what they will tolerate!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob-Wyo

10-30-2003 19:31:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-30-2003 18:40:12  
Frank another idea, we were going to do but never got around to it, was build one useing a airplane variable pitch propeller. We thought we could then tell at what pitch and RPM each tractor could handle and or who could turn the highest pitch.
Just another idea, I like your's too, would be interesting to watch. best of luck. Bob



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

10-30-2003 19:51:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Bob-Wyo, 10-30-2003 19:31:18  
Bob:

So, we need to find a prop off of say a C-119, complete with prop governor..... Ha!

Seriously, a variable load unit would be neat, but it really makes it more complicated, doesn't it....



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ed Tucker

10-31-2003 13:28:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-30-2003 19:51:56  
Frank, Where are you going to find a prop off of a Flying Box-car today?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

10-31-2003 17:23:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Ed Tucker, 10-31-2003 13:28:29  
Davis-Monthan AFB.....bone yard. I was there a few years ago, and there were hundreds of them.

But if we can't find for a "Dollar-Nineteen", we'll have to use one from something newer!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ed Tucker

10-31-2003 17:58:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to F-I-T, 10-31-2003 17:23:28  
The reason I asked, was my Dad flew them in the Reserves and as a gunship in Nam.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dennis minn

10-30-2003 17:33:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to 720Deere, 10-30-2003 16:47:24  
A quick rule of thumb regarding fans/props/centrifugalpumps. speed is proportional to volumetric flow, differential pressure is proportional to the speed squared, and power required to turn it is speed cubed. Simply stated, if you double the speed the power to turn it is times 8.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe Evans

10-30-2003 21:17:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to dennis minn, 10-30-2003 17:33:33  
That is abstatutely correct! I have worked out a HP to RPM table for our Club's fan (likely a Baker)and when you do double the speed, HP required is increased by a factor of 8.
My chart says so right on the money.

hp2 = (rpm2/rpm1)^3 x hp1

What folks a whole lot sharper than me would not tackle is this: given the OD & ID of the fan blade arc and the paddle dims, what HP is required to turn the fan at, say, 300 RPM? NOBODY would approach solving the question in this manner. They just pointed me to the above equation. I have also flipped the equation around to develop a chart that says: If your SO and So WTF model tractor is 50 HP at the belt, then you should be able to crank our fan at 431 RPM. If you can't, you're a fibber, or your tractor needs tuned.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dennis Minn

10-31-2003 16:09:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Joe Evans, 10-30-2003 21:17:36  
Joe, I'm glad the dusty remnants of my memory are not all gone, the equations I stated were simplified from a much larger algorithm. I like the equation you provided, it's simple and it answers just about all aspects if it's manipulated. Sounds like you're an educated man,(educated meaning you use what you learn). Regards, Dennis.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe Evans

10-31-2003 21:04:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to Dennis Minn, 10-31-2003 16:09:13  
Dennis: thanks for the compliment, but I can be real SLOW in figuring things out.

You're RPM doubled = 8x HP requirements immediately made me close down the YT window and open up my fan chart. I have it on an Excel spreadsheet where I can plug the observed fan RPM in and get the HP figure in another column. Dang if that ain't true! It varies a couple of tenths here and there, but it's as concrete as things get.

On and off for a year I kept banging on people to figure out the fan from a dimensional viewpoint. No takers. I suppose if I talked to an engineer that designed fans or propellers, that might've gotten the answer I wanted. Everyone kept quoting the fan law...the fan law...change in RPM...change in RPM...Doooh! (Homer Simpson sound). It was staring me right in the puss.

The key is having a known HP and that known HP turning the fan at the max that HP will get you. We had a guy with a Super M on the fan last summer. He got 430 RPM max. I safely assumed the Super M was factory at 46.37 max BHP because the Super M owner's stuff is 'right'. Just plug these figures in for the base point, then work the equation up or down. I DID make an assumption about the Super M, but using it as a base point squares with what I remember an Oliver 88 Diesel (54 HP) turned two years ago on the fan. What I really need to do, and I'll get to it, is put my Deering W-9 on the fan and see what the RPM is. The W-9 was belted to a real neat prony brake 1-1/2 months ago, and registered 50.0 BHP. That is for sure a known HP figure, and then I'll use the W-9 as a bench mark. Am now wondering about efficiency and % loss with a belt drive.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dennis Minn

10-30-2003 18:07:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Baker Fan in reply to dennis minn, 10-30-2003 17:33:33  
Sorry, just re-read my post and saw that my words came across as crusty and short, didn't intend it to sound that way, Dennis.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy