|
Kent: I think you will find those heavy harvesters with separate blower will perform better, under powered than the light harvesters will. I started out with a NH Super 717, then went to the small NH with separate blower, (7xx I forget the complete number. Then I went to a NH 890, and yes on 1066 it would fill wagons in 5 min or less. I had it hooked to a 766 several times, no loading in 5 min, but performance was respectable. The 718 you are using is cut and throw, right or wrong? The 781 is cutter head and separate blower, right or wrong? If I'm right on both counts, my guess is if you start using that 781, the 718 will soon get parked. I would bet on that. The 781 is NH right, I've lost tract of these model numbers. The one I had and couldn't remember number, I'm betting was earlier model to the 781, does 780 seem reasonable. If that be the case I wouldn't want to use much over 125 hp on that harvester. That is the precise reason I don't remember model number, I only had it 4 months from new. I could see very quickly 1066 was going to make mincemeat of the harvester. New Holland dealer gave me an awfully good trade on 890. I pointed out some of weak points and he could quite easily see he and NH were going to be ones with black eye.
|