Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Rakes

pros and cons of types?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Chuck, WA

04-07-2003 14:35:11




Report to Moderator

I'm looking for a hay rake to harvest three to five acres of grass hay. The acreage is small with some tight maneuvering. I'm not finding much available in my area, though I've got info on a couple or three John Deere ground-drive rakes.

My initial thoughts were that I wanted a 3-pt (if possible for easier maneuvering) pto driven side delivery rake. I have an old Ferguson DE-O-20, but haven't had time to get it in working order - needs a good bit - so am looking for another working rake to replace it.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of different types: towed versus 3-pt, ground drive versus pto drive? Other thoughts?

Any to avoid, or any problems to be watching for?

Thanks!

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Leroy

04-13-2003 08:58:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 14:35:11  
Last fall when you posted that you had bought that mower and rake I new you were taken, that mower can never be made to work, as for rakes a neighbor has a wheel rake, last year when the alfalfa was short it would not pick it up, lost all the crop because of that, my J D 594 or N I No.4 would not have had a problem raking that hay, those rakes are 4 wheel with 2 large wheels in front and 2 small caster wheels in back and were designed in the horse drawn era and today in my area a good one will still bring in the neighbor hood of $ $ 4-500, those that say the pto rakes run either too fast or to slow and either beat the hay or do not run fast enough to do the work have not bought the correct drive for their tractors, the tow type will work better raking arount the field where the mounted will work beter if you rake back and forth especialy if you make a double rake row

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kurt Van Doran

04-08-2003 12:55:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 14:35:11  
Presumably you're raking alfalfa or other fine bladed grass? I saw mention from some guys about wheel rakes. Down here in North Texas we grow Coastal Bemuda grass as well as other coarser types of forage. The bermuda grass is very fine and the wheel rakes work very well with it. The ground driven side delivery rakes work better with slightly heavier stalked plants. Don't get a roll type side delivery rake if you're harvesting fine bladed plants or you'll leave quite a bit in the field.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck, WA

04-08-2003 16:00:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Kurt Van Doran, 04-08-2003 12:55:55  
Kurt...grass



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kurt Van Doran

04-08-2003 12:52:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 14:35:11  
Presumably you're raking alfalfa or other fine bladed grass? I saw mention from some guys about wheel rakes. Down here in North Texas we grow Coastal Bemuda grass as well as other coarser types of forage. The bermuda grass is very fine and the wheel rakes work very well with it. The ground driven side delivery rakes work better with slightly heavier stalked plants. Don't get a roll type side delivery rake if you're harvesting fine bladed plants or you'll leave quite a bit in the field.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck, WA

04-07-2003 19:58:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 14:35:11  
Thanks for your opinions. That helps give me a little more confidence.

I put a "wanted" ad in the local classified tabloid, and have gotten three replies - two John Deere ground driven towed, and one a guy who was looking for a rake and asked what I'd found.

I looked at one that replied to my ad today - an old John Deere ground drive towed rake today - poor condition, $350, and seller of questionnable reputation. Passed on that one. The other response was apparently in better shape - wanted $500, so I passed that on to the other guy who was looking for one.

Slim pickings around here.

I also dropped by small gray market tractor dealer who also refurbishes rotovators and also handles a few new implements. He had a two-wheel wheel rake for abot $380 - 6-1/2 ft working width. That has possibilities.

In the meantime, I'm finding that the sickle mower I bought may be unusable. So, may be out of luck anyhow.

Thanks again for replies.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

04-08-2003 11:27:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 19:58:54  
What did you get for a mower? Is it incompatable, or a major break on it?

--->Paul



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck, WA

04-09-2003 08:13:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to paul, 04-08-2003 11:27:35  
Paul...

Last night, I actually got the mower running. Still needs structural fix and still needs one guard and at least one new cutter blade, but after a bit of cleaning and greasing, I connected the shaft and with great uncertainty, let out the clutch (MF35 with live power, 2-stage clutch and ground/engine selector). Darned if it didn't work like it's supposed to. Mom - 80 years old and who lived most of her life on a small Colorado farm where they had wheat and alfalfa - said it sounded just like it should. :)

Guess I'm a bit more encouraged. Still have to figure out how to engage the mechanical lift, and also how to lock the frame that connects the drive mechanism to the bar in a raised position. If I can get there, looks like it will work. Right now, chasing manuals and advice.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck, WA

04-08-2003 14:24:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to paul, 04-08-2003 11:27:35  
Mower...arg!!

I thought it would take only minor repairs, but last night I took a hard look at it and am on the verge of bush hogging this year and forgetting trying to rake and bale. It's not that the repairs are extensive, but that what a previous owner did to it might have made it no beter than a parts mower.

I bought a New Idea 7 ft. sickle mower and think I got taken! No wonder the guy threw in the Ferguson rake for nothing - he was asking $30 for it. The rake is not good for much but parts I'm thinking, unless I have lots of time to give it. The mower was a towed, but somebody tried to convert it to a 3-pt, and I'm not sure what they did was workable. Gotta chew on that a bit more.

If I had everything working, I'd be mowing tonight...weather has been nice nad the grass in one field is up to almost knee high. Gonna either have to mow for harvest or bush hog and let it lie just to keep it manageable.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan(Washington also)

04-07-2003 18:15:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 14:35:11  
I talked to ya when you were getting the equipment last fall. I have a semi integral JD Rake, they typw with the arched frame and wheels on the back. It is ground driven. It works well but if you make tight turns on the end it stops so you sometimes get a bunch of hay piled up. I use it for making and turning windrows. I have also used a 3 point rake. They are more maneuverable and with PTO drive run all the time, especially if you have live pto on the tractor. Only problem is that because they are so close coupled with tractor any "bobbles" you make with it are more pronounced on your windrow. Think you would be happy with either of the above types. ON the semi integral type the front lifts with the 3 point if mounted on a hitch bar on the 3 point. The older wheel types with wheels on front and back may work fine but take a lot of space to turn. If you keep an eye on the free papers from tri cities and basin you should be able to find a good rake for reasonable price.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RayP(MI)

04-07-2003 17:49:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 14:35:11  
I conned my father-in-law out of his old NewIdea 3pt/pto driven rake last summer. Raked about 40 acres with it, with no troubles, and it did a good job. Neat thing is how it follows the tractor. It is really close coupled to the tractor. Had to shorten the pto shaft for use on the Farmall 200 I was using. Overall, I was happy with it and the results. If you find one, don't be afraid of it. The pto drive precludes problems induced with wheel slippage, etc. The unit I had had three guage wheels behind, and didn't bottom out much, if at all.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

04-07-2003 16:10:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Chuck, WA, 04-07-2003 14:35:11  
The rollabar side delivery rake on 2 rubber wheels, ground driven (off of the 2 wheels), like a NH 55/56/256 or similar JD is king around here. They sell from $300 - 1500+ used - mostly closer to the $800-1200 range for a good 56 or older 256.

A good buy for you would be a similar type, not JD or NH. They sell more like $150-300, and would work just fine for 5 acres. Make sure you can find fingers for it in your area, and have fun. New Idea, IH, etc.

I think in all my auctions & years I have only seen 2 pto driven 3-point rakes. No one wants them around here. They weren't even junked out - just no one ever bought them new in the first place! I guess I really couldn't say good or bad about them - just would not buy one because no one has one - must be for a reason.

There are the old 'wheel' rakes where the spring fingers are turned by pulling on the ground. They have 4 or 5 very big wheels with the fingers around the edge. They work, but not as well in all conditions. Round about $200.

There are the new 'wheel' rakes that are on wheels or 3-point, they have very long wire flexable spring fingers and many people are quite happy with them. They work just like the old wheel rakes, but the long curved tine & more of them seem to work a lot better than the older style above. They do corner kinda odd, esp 3-point in one direction. Being newer, you are back to the $300-700 range. These are probably the 2nd most popular.

Then there are the old 4-wheel side delivery rakes, mostly on steel. About $25, if you can get it home. These DO NOT back up well and are not as manuverable, but for the money & your few acres, if in good shape it will last you many years and do a fine job. They do tend to 'crab' to one side if you do a lot of hills (road ditches on the slope).

I would spend my money & pay the most attention to getting a good baler, then a good mower, and for a small acrage I would put the least effort (if I run out of money, buy the cheapest! :) into the siderake.

These prices & ideas are relative to southern Minnesota. Different conditions & regions have _very_ different ideas about haymaking, so I might be all wrong for your situation.

--->Paul

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

04-08-2003 03:23:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to paul, 04-07-2003 16:10:59  
Paul: I kind of like your reasoning, the rollbar rakes with two wheels behind and ground driven are the best. The ground driven always has the right ground to reel speed ratio right. Those pto driven rakes seemed to catch on a bit in my area, but it soon died. You get the tractor one gear too slow and they will thrash every leaf off your hay. The few guys that bought them were the guys that thought Harry Ferguson was god.

My second choise for small acerage would be the long finger wheel rake, economical.

Where I disagree with you is on the $50. to $150. bar rakes with large wheels on front and casters behind. Good enough rakes in their day, however I doubt if there are any around that are little more than scrap metal. If there is a good one left, it is worth more than you say.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tim(nj)

04-08-2003 20:11:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Hugh MacKay, 04-08-2003 03:23:29  
3-pt PTO rakes work fine on Fergies and MFs that have the 2-stage clutch for live pto because you can set the PTO lever to either engine drive or ground drive. So when I rake with my MF65 and 3-pt PTO New Idea rake, I basically have a ground driven rake which works well. Put that rake on the Ford NAA, and it turns into a hay beater.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck, WA

04-09-2003 08:06:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Tim(nj), 04-08-2003 20:11:24  
Tim...Thanks for that reply. Mine is a MF35 and I was wondering about that. I'm green enough that I didn't really appreciate what the ground/engine selection was for. I was guessing exactly what you said, but wasn't sure.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

04-09-2003 02:51:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Tim(nj), 04-08-2003 20:11:24  
Tim : Having never owned a Fergie I had forgotten about that one, and of course your right. Don't get me wrong either on Harry Ferguson, when all the American row crop tractors changed their configuration thus moving the operator ahead 1.5', they were able to put a good rear hitch on them.

I always tell the guys over at the Farmall page that Harry Ferguson won the hitch war before IH sold their first fast hitch. It wasn't fast hitch either that killed fast hitch, it was the operator sitting on top of it thus not allowing enough lift range. Believe me I well remember a lever on fast hitch corn planter, hooking in my hip pocket, taking me and seat with it, as I lowered planter, moving at 3 mph and at 1800 rpm on the 560D. I did manage to get foot on clutch, but couldn't reach any of the hand controls.

On that ground drive Fergie pto. A lot of guys in my area built what they called power trailers. They would use a truck rear end with right ratio to match the Fergie pto and ground speed. They used them mainly in farm woodlots. Quite a unit in their day.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ken

04-07-2003 18:12:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to paul, 04-07-2003 16:10:59  
I bought a New Idea wheel rake for $150 at an auction last spring. I am like you, I only cut and bale about 3 acres of hay so I didn't want to spend much money on a rake (or the rest of the equipment). I didn't know anything about a wheel rake other then I have seen a lot of new wheel rakes in dealers lots lately so I though I would give it a try. The rake works good but the corners bunch a little. One thing I like about it, it is very gentle with the hay. You can go fast and it don't knock the leaves off the alfalfa like other wheel or pto driven rakes do. Just my two cents worth! Good Luck.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Big Jim

04-08-2003 11:37:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Ken, 04-07-2003 18:12:00  
I recently bought a New Idea 5 wheel rake at an auction for $75. It is in real good shape and only needs about 3 or 4 teeth.
I am eager to try it out, as I have never used a wheel rake before. Unfortunately, I will have to be patient, as haying season is several months away yet in our area.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck, WA

04-08-2003 14:26:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Rakes - pros and cons of types? in reply to Big Jim, 04-08-2003 11:37:38  
Haven't seen any older wheel rakes around here. One small dealer here handles Sitrex wheel rakes, but the least expensive is a 2 wheel (6-1/2 ft) for $380. I'd like new, but not prepared to put that much into a new one for just a few acres.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy