Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Discussion Forum

NH 271 Baler

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Rick

09-19-2002 06:43:04




Report to Moderator

How does a NH 271 compare to a 268 and 273 baler. I'm looking at buying one. I've used a 273 before; is it as good as a 273.




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
JP

09-19-2002 18:41:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: NH 271 Baler in reply to Rick, 09-19-2002 06:43:04  
I have used a 270, 271, and 273 as well as some others. The 271 also has a ball bearing on the plunger where a 270 has a greased bushing. the 270/271 are a smaller capacity but in my opinion a much better baler. They seem almost impossible to clog, and make very nice bales. the 270/271 also have in my opinion a much simpler more reliable feeder system. The 271 also seemed much easier for the tractor to run. If I had to choose between the two I would definately take the 271. I think that if it has been taken care of it will give excellent service.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JP

09-19-2002 18:39:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: NH 271 Baler in reply to Rick, 09-19-2002 06:43:04  
I have used a 270, 271, and 273 as well as some others. The 271 also has a ball bearing on the plunger where a 270 has a greased bushing. the 270/271 are a smaller capacity but in my opinion a much better baler. They seem almost impossible to clog, and make very nice bales. the 270/271 also have in my opinion a much simpler more reliable feeder system. The 271 also seemed much easier for the tractor to run. If I had to choose between the two I would definately take the 271. I think that if it has been taken care of it will give excellent service.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

09-19-2002 18:19:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: NH 271 Baler in reply to Rick, 09-19-2002 06:43:04  
A 271 is the same as a 270, with the extra set of knuckles in the pto line.

I think they are lower capacity than a 273. Can't really compare, as all I know is my 270, never ran a 273.

--->Paul



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy