Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Implement Alley Discussion Forum

Hugh's LATEST blunder

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
MF Poor

12-22-2007 05:29:27




Report to Moderator

third party image

Once again, ol' Hugh left out some key information, because it's all about what he DOESN'T know.

The 35/135 Masseys weren't the only raging success the boys from Banner Lane cranked out.

The 35/135 series was a giant success. So was the F-40/MH50/MF50/MF150 series, not to mention the incredably popular 65/165 series. (And we shouldn't forget that at one point, Massey was #1 in combine production with the very advanced for its day, model 300)

My screen name is about my never ending search for NOS/OEM parts to restore what I think is the best 40hp class utility tractor ever built, the MF150. It's essentially a 135 with the front clip off of a 165 grafted to it. Longer wheel base, heavier front axle, better steering, bigger fuel tank, and all the optional bells and whistles of a 135 as standard equipment.

So Hugh. We know you're proud of what you know. Now maybe you should take the time to learn the rest of the story and not assume you know it all.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Up North Louie

12-22-2007 18:38:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to phillip d, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
Thank you, Railhead. Very well said.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
railhead

12-22-2007 16:10:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
If you are talking about the Hugh I know on this site, I cannot imagine how you have taken such exception to anything he has said. He is one of the nicest people I have met on here. I guess I just don't know the whole story. You must feel real strong about what you like, that is admirable.

Back to Hugh, I am a IH guy....I think he knows his stuff.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MF Poor

12-22-2007 16:29:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to railhead, 12-22-2007 16:10:45  
He may well know his "IH". I'm not getting into that. I know my limitations. I don't claim to be an authority on subjects where I don't know my way around. I'm not claiming to be an authority on all things about farming. I have a small place that isn't a commercial farming operation. It's just where I live in the country. But I've been around Massey Ferguson tractors, equipment that would qualify as small even by the standards of 25 years ago for most of my life. I have a collection of Ferguson, Massey Harris, and Massey Ferguson literature and manuals that would fill a barn. I've spent literally thousands of hours in the seat of a tractor. I own a business that has 4 or 5 tractors logging 1000+ hours each during the summer months. (Mowing highway right-of-ways, ect) And with all this, I don't claim to know it all. And I don't claim that I "have a duty to inform the novice" as someone has claimed. But I DO have the same right to post here as anyone. I DO have a right to point out when someone is blowing smoke up someone elses hind end. Like I said in an earlier post, we aren't flying to another galaxy here, we're talking about old trators and implements. This isn't all that complicated. No need to make it appear so to impress someone who doesn't know the difference.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RodInNS

12-22-2007 19:07:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 16:29:52  
You may not agree with Hugh about disc blades, but I can assure you that in our field conditions, he is correct. An 18" blade worn to 16" is just about worthless. I don't see it so much an issue of curvature, but of disc thickness. They wear thin too ya'know... when they wear thin, they break. I can assure you that not too many make it to that diameter here. They're all smashed and broken by then. I'll take then off by that time, replace the bearings and save the old discs for spares. When the spares are all gone it's time for another update.

The M-F 25 disc is just a disc. I don't think it's any more or any less than any other. It works and it breaks the same as all the others I own. For the record I have 2 trailed tandems (BushHog and Pittsburg), the mounted Massey, and an offest Pittsburg. The offset Pittsburg is by far the best of the lot in terms of quality. The BushHog is second. It's a toss between the other two.
I've seen days here where they were all in pieces.
Also had an old IH tandem that was a very good disc in many ways as well...

The IH gave us more trouble with the frame than anything else. The Pittsburg gave a lot of trouble with gang bolts and discs breaking until I rebuilt it and respaced the bearings. The BushHog lost it's hitch but is otherwise very tough. ALL have their faults.

Rod

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
railhead

12-22-2007 17:14:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 16:29:52  
OK and I am not just trying to get the last word but think about this. No we are not talking about flying to another galaxy...but...A farmer (aka one who earns his living from tratcors and implements) has to know more than just hook it to a tractor and start dragging it around the field. I think Hugh's train of thought is from lifelong learned experience where small, subtle variances or differences can equate to a overwhelming difference when it is time to haul your product to exchange it for $. Farming is a business where the bottom line is thin, thin, thin. So, when he talks of disc wear etc. it is because he has learned what works best to get ground worked to his standards to produce the best product he can. Every farmer tries to do that, some are more attentive to small details than others, just like in every other profession you can name. Some are just better at their jobs. Another thought, if you had a bad disease and went to a Dr., would you want someone that would focus, I mean really focus on how to make YOU better, or would you just want one to generalize and say it aint traveling to another galaxy....get my train of thought here? I have read him detail things that way. I don't personally have the attention span to detail stuff like he can but I admire those who can and sometimes it pays to force yourself to focus deeper. I do not know him personally but he has given me advice and I have read many many of his posts. I would imagine he was (IS) successful, he has time to help dummies like me that ask for his help.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck NH

12-22-2007 15:55:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
Didn't know a disc question could be so harrowing.... Sorry, I couldn't resist. Chuck



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MF Poor

12-22-2007 15:59:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Chuck NH, 12-22-2007 15:55:24  
I know what you mean ;) Sometimes it's just so easy you can't pass it by!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MF Poor

12-22-2007 15:31:29




Report to Moderator
 Hugh, my appology in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
I would have never spoke my piece had I known that it was going to draw attention to the fact that all your pals on here are a bunch of whiney momma's babies hangin' on to hind teat with nothing much worthwhile to say. ;)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

12-22-2007 19:53:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh, my appology in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 15:31:29  
MF Poor: I don't call this any kind of an appology, nor is it accepted as such. You've used some quite unkind words about me. Now your coming on here calling a lot of these guys "whiney momma's babies hangin' on to hind teat with nothing much worthwhile to say."

I've only ever met one of these guys in person. I have been involved in discussion with most of them, and you know I respect what most of them have to say. You've got to be nuts if you think I'm going to accept your appology, yet you go on and call most of these guys whiney momma's babies. These are our friends, your friends and my friends, yet you insist on calling them nasty names. Good night, and am I ever glad I don't have to spend Christmas with you.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
johns48jdb

12-22-2007 15:02:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
just wondering why you'll are all "blundering" by talking tractors on an implement discussion forum? must be a slow news day huh? you'll have a good christmas any way.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RN

12-22-2007 13:38:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
If you want some fun cussin each other - stop over at the OT board. Tractor insults would be a change from the political dis cussin. (humor alert- I have to note that ;^) RN



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

12-22-2007 10:14:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
I have had 35, 135, 50, 165 and 2 285's and a 2675 V8(pure junk). None of them were any count except the 35 and 135. There may have been other good ones, but my vote goes with 35 and 135 as the best MF ever built. Massey combines were good, But Hugh only said he thought the 35/135 were the best ever put out by MF, He never said a word about the others, and from my experience with MF tractors I agree 100%. Use to be lots of MF's around here until folks got on a real work tractor, they have all but dissapeared here now. Use to go to Nebraska and SD to hunt pheasants. Seen lots of MF combines, but only one MF tractor the whole time. Mostly JD and IH with a few Case,MM, and AC's in the mix.Most MF sales were overseas, and not here in the states. Our local MF dealer quit selling them and is a Kubota dealer now.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Michael Soldan

12-22-2007 10:13:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
Wow, listen to the guy with the "Trailer Queen" telling a real farmer that he made a blunder..the only blunder is an Ego like you coming onto a real tractor forum



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Larry806

12-22-2007 12:25:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Michael Soldan, 12-22-2007 10:13:17  
Who is the "real farmer " your talking about ??



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
J.C.H.

12-22-2007 11:28:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Michael Soldan, 12-22-2007 10:13:17  
My sentiments also.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MF Poor

12-22-2007 10:24:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Michael Soldan, 12-22-2007 10:13:17  
That "trailer queen" works for a living. It logged over 300 hours this past summer on a mowing crew. And where's Hugh's tractors? Oh yeah, they're past history. In other words, just a lot of talk.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
J.C.H.

12-22-2007 11:29:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 10:24:33  
Go some where else with your ranting,we are tired of reading it.Kim take action!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MF Poor

12-22-2007 11:35:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to J.C.H., 12-22-2007 11:29:55  
I see ONE person "ranting". He posted under the screenname of J.C.S.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Poogie

12-22-2007 10:04:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
Hugh said the 35 / 135 was one of the best.so do not bash or accuse him of not knowing. I do not agree with him on all issues but he has possibly more seat time than any of us. I have a 165 D and a IHC 574 D. the IHC is far ahead of the Massey in everything except fuel economy and ease of working on. I like the 35 / 135/ 40/ 50/ 150 but the 165 appears more clumsy.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
moonlite 37

12-22-2007 10:03:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
Hugh said the 35 / 135 was one of the best.so do not bash or accuse him of not knowing. I do not agree with him on all issues but he has possibly more seat time than any of us. I have a 165 D and a IHC 574 D. the IHC is far ahead of the Massey in everything except fuel economy and ease of working on. I like the 35 / 135/ 40/ 50/ 150 but the 165 appears more clumsy.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
bradk

12-22-2007 13:51:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to moonlite 37, 12-22-2007 10:03:51  
Poogie/Moonlite 37,

Do you have split personalities or just two handles?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kent in NB

12-22-2007 09:18:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
At least Hugh doesn't hide behind a fake name when he takes a stand! You could try being a little bit civil, instead of spewing drivel! Merry Christmas. Kent in NB.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kent in NB

12-22-2007 09:17:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
At least Hugh doesn't hide behind a fake name when he takes a stand! You could try being a little bit civil, instead of spewing drivel! Merry Christmas. Kent in NB.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Up North Louie

12-22-2007 07:22:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Jimmy King, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
Hugh has helped more people on this board than anybody I can think of, along with a handful of others. In his BEST year, Ted Williams batted .400, and Hugh makes Williams' numbers look pathetic.
And you've done what, besides kvetch?

Get a life, Bucko.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave H (MI)

12-22-2007 07:54:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Up North Louie, 12-22-2007 07:22:25  
Personally, when two old bulls decide to charge head on at each other I think it is better to move to another pasture rather than stand between them. I think the same converstations would be very entertaining at the coffee shop. Just sounds bad here.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
rrlund

12-22-2007 09:45:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Dave H (MI), 12-22-2007 07:54:13  
Like Rush says,if somebody wants to make a fool of themselves,get out of the way and let 'em.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MF Poor

12-22-2007 10:21:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to rrlund, 12-22-2007 09:45:15  
And with that in mind, have at it Hugh and his band of merry clowns!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
J.C.H.

12-22-2007 11:34:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 10:21:32  
Who you calling a clown? You're making an unwelcome fellow of your self. Mark Twain said:I believe our Heavanly father created man because he was dissapointed in the Monkey and here you are making a monkey of yourself,shame on you.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MF Poor

12-22-2007 11:37:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to J.C.H., 12-22-2007 11:34:35  
I bet you've heard that Twain quote a time or 2 in your life, haven't you? ;)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JT

12-22-2007 05:57:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to MF Poor, 12-22-2007 05:29:27  
Then last I checked the only man that was perfect that walked the face of this earth is having his birthday celebrated Tuesday. So what is the point of this comment??



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ken Crisman

12-22-2007 08:08:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to JT, 12-22-2007 05:57:26  
Amen ! Merry CHRISTmas guys . Besure to celebrate by having CHRIST at the center of the party .



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
mark

12-22-2007 12:26:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: Hugh's LATEST blunder in reply to Ken Crisman, 12-22-2007 08:08:49  
Hehehe, this is good, cheap entertainment! I like it!

Back to where it all began, they made one fine disk. Lot's of people around here had those MF'ers and every one of them worked on them more than they used them. I can take you to 2 of the biggest farms in the community and show you where red and gray paint was, and green paint does the work now. If you own a MF'er, you better own a big toolbox as well.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy