Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Implement Alley Discussion Forum

Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Bob in NH

05-18-2007 11:22:41




Report to Moderator

Can anyone tell me how a Ford 532 baler compares to the 542? Is the 542 newer? Larger?

I just bought a 532 in very good condition with a T500 ejector and have a chance to pick up a 542 dirt cheap. The 542 hasn't been used for a while, was covered up outside, but has a fair amount of surface rust. I am replacing a Ford 250 which I have been using since 1983 and am now baling over 3500 per year.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Bob in NH

05-19-2007 17:43:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Bob in NH, 05-18-2007 11:22:41  
Thanks for all the replies!

Well the cheap 542 didn't end up being too cheap after all. Auction closed on ebay at $555.09 this AM. I looked at it earlier this week (Tues I think) and it will need some work, like probably most of the bearings replaced on the plunger assy, pickup, and exposed parts. Plus 2 new tires and the carrier bearing housing on the PTO shaft is broken, the knotters really rusty. All the rust was surface. I didn't bother bidding when I saw the price skyrocket!

The 532 I bought ($800) has really good paint, no visible damage, flotation tires, good pickup, and an ejector in like-new condition. (The original owner had removed and stored it because his tractor was too small. Second owner never installed it). Unfortunately it does have the rubber mounted pickup teeth, but isn't missing any. The only problem is a broken knotter cam on the right knotter, and he has a new part to replace it. Knotters look essentially the same as those on my 250, and I have had them apart numerous times until I fixed the problem by buying a parts baler. Currently have two complete extra knottter assemblies ready to simply bolt on if needed.

My 250 is a good baler, but I broke the PTO overrun clutch and the one from the parts baler is slightly twisted on the splined portion. It works, but I run the slip clutch loose and pray a lot! We often push the old girl to the limit and have baled as many as 675 bales in a day with it connected to our 44 JD A handstart. My haying partner has a NH 275 which I have also run with the A. You can really tell that is behind you!

My JD 2010 diesel handles both fantastically and should have no problem pulling a wagon behind the 532.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jim.UT

05-21-2007 13:33:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Bob in NH, 05-19-2007 17:43:35  
Yeah, I was really surprised it went that high, too. I got my 542 for free. After $300 worth of bearings and other miscellaneous (plus some long distance consultations with Jerry D) I had it working. I'd probably pay up to $100 for a parts baler, but not $555.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob in NH

05-21-2007 18:08:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Jim.UT, 05-21-2007 13:33:04  
Jim, An old "sort-of-working baler will easily bring $1000 here, especially if if looks OK and isn't all beated up. A friend bought a JD 14T several years ago which looked good from a distance, fresh paint, over all the rust. When he got into it, it wouldn't tie knots on one side, the PTO input into the gearbox was shot and mickey-moused, the bottom of the bale chamber rusted, puttied over and painted, etc. We spent weeks on the knotter, finally got a parts baler and swapped parts. He fixed it up to work and dumped it for $1300.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jim.UT

05-21-2007 18:43:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Bob in NH, 05-21-2007 18:08:06  
third party image

Gee, so you think maybe my old 542 is worth $1300 if I could get it to your neighborhood?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry D in NC

05-19-2007 10:01:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Bob in NH, 05-18-2007 11:22:41  
Pick up the 542 if for nothing else than parts. Almost all parts are interchangable. Unless I am badly mistaken the only difference was the strokes per minute gearbox. See if they both can be gotten to bale and have a spare until you have to raid it.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jim.UT

05-18-2007 16:38:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Bob in NH, 05-18-2007 11:22:41  
I don't have my 532/542 parts book in front of me so I can't give you specifics, but I believe a lot of parts are interchangeable....knotters, needles, etc. However I believe the plunger is not something you can use.

Another thing to keep in mind is that the Ford balers came with either spring teeth or rubber base teeth in the pickup. You can't just swap a spring tooth for a rubber base tooth because the entire pickup assembly was different. If you're hoping to score some pickup teeth, make sure the parts baler has the same style pickup as the one you're using.

I could use some rubber base teeth. I haven't found a source for replacements other than NH and they are expensive. Shoup has one in their catalog that looks close enough that I might be able to modify it to work, but I haven't tried that yet.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RodInNS

05-18-2007 14:25:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Bob in NH, 05-18-2007 11:22:41  
As far as I know, the 542 was the heavier duty, higher capacity version of the 532. Bigger feed opening and that type of thing.
The 532 was a good baler. We still have one, and use it for a couple thousand a year. It's mostly gone through at this point and should go for quite some time now. However, if I had to do it over, I'd have just gone and bought a NH or hesston inline baler. Parts for the Ford fall into one of two categories.... The stuff that Ford made is NLA. Period. The stuff that they outsourced is mostly still availablem and a lot of that is precious expensive. They're not a baler to make a career out of....

Rod

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Unimog

05-18-2007 11:48:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Ford 532 Baler versus 542 baler? in reply to Bob in NH, 05-18-2007 11:22:41  
I think the difference is the 542 is a heavy duty
or higher capacity model. They were both made from
1975-1981 and make the same size bales. The 542
weighs more by about 200 pounds. I had a 532 years back and it worked good but parts were a
little hard to find. I would guess most parts are
gone from all the dealers now. Is the 542 the one
I saw on Craig's list? Looked like a good deal for
this part of the country.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy