Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Implement Alley Discussion Forum

JD 336 baler; best option?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Nick Kau

01-09-2007 11:53:28




Report to Moderator

I'm looking to purchase a small square baler, and would like some input on what will be best for me. I currently make 25 acres of mixed hay on rented ground, and with custom work will probably be putting close to 10,000 bales through whatever baler I purchase this year.

My budget is my biggest constraint; I really can't spend much more than $4K right now, and want something that will be pretty reliable, easily adjustable, and have good parts support.

I will be running this baler primarily with an Oliver 880 (50 hp), or a 770 (40 hp) if I get in a pinch.

I've been told the deere's are pretty reliable, and probably make the best bales with the least amount of messing around making adjustments. I've also been told that for whatever reason, the 336 would be a bit easier on my tractors as well.

The biggest drawback is that I do bale on wagons, and have heard quite a lot people bash the pan thrower (thrower tears the baler apart, etc.).

What are your opinions? Oh, and what is the difference between the 30# and 40# throwers? Thanks for any input.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Dave Sherburne NY

01-10-2007 08:04:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD 336 baler; best option? in reply to Nick Kau, 01-09-2007 11:53:28  
Very good baler but that hydraulic kicker is a pain. Had the mechanic out to look at it last fall
he made some adjustments but never got to test it
because of the rain every day in NY



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe/pa

01-10-2007 06:20:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD 336 baler; best option? in reply to Nick Kau, 01-09-2007 11:53:28  
I run a 336 with a kicker (not sure which model), and really like it. Rarely does it miss a bale, haven't broken many shear pins either. The kicker pan doesn't do bad, I kick into a kicker wagons (both wood and metal sides) and they keep their shape pretty well and rarely bust. I use a Oliver 1755 (86 hp) but have ran if off of a Farmall 504 (46 hp) and it did ok.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nick Kau

01-09-2007 21:14:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD 336 baler; best option? in reply to Nick Kau, 01-09-2007 11:53:28  

I"m in a position where all of my hay is delivered 5-10+ miles away to customers, so kicking bales onto regular hay racks is kind of a neccessity.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RickL

01-10-2007 04:44:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD 336 baler; best option? in reply to Nick Kau, 01-09-2007 21:14:28  
Nick; All the more reason to use the baskets,much easier unloading and they trail alot better



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RickL

01-09-2007 17:52:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD 336 baler; best option? in reply to Nick Kau, 01-09-2007 11:53:28  
been there done that,forget the thrower and use bale basket wagon instead. Ha d both and definetly basket wagon over the thrower period from when I had them. Run accumulator setup now. I ran a 327 Jd baer for years and was great unit. they do make more uniforn bales than the red units can.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Roger in Iowa

01-09-2007 14:46:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: JD 336 baler; best option? in reply to Nick Kau, 01-09-2007 11:53:28  
The 336, 337 and 338 are about the same baler. Higher numbers are later versions. Heavier duty machines are 346, 347 and 348. All are about the same as far as the tractor is concerned. 40 to 50 horse is about minimum, especially if pulling wagons and should not be in hilly country. Very simple and reliable machines. Can be updated to latest knotters.

The 40 is a later version of the 30 ejector. Easier to hook/unhook wagons as the shield raises out of the way and locks the ejector. You do not want hydraulic bale tensioning with an ejector!

Roger in Iowa (retired JD hay factory)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy