Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Implement Alley Discussion Forum

Difference between New Holland 68 and 273

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
ScottSD

04-17-2006 10:52:44




Report to Moderator

Hello,

I'm new to this forum but in doing some searches, I've found it very useful.

Last fall I purchased a NH 68 for $100. I was told that the knotters needed some work. I haven't had a chance to try it out yet.

Well, the other day I was at an auction and purchased a 273 for $300. It is bigger and is in a lot better condition that the model 68 I had. Also, the owners said it was used a couple of years ago.

Anyway, what is the major differences in the two.

Another question, how can I find how old each of these balers are? Get the serial numbers and contact New Holland?

Thanks

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
ScottSD

04-19-2006 10:49:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Difference between New Holland 68 and 273 in reply to ScottSD, 04-17-2006 10:52:44  
Thanks for all of the great ideas.

I wanted to know how old each of these balers was, so I called New Holland.

Well, the 68 model's serial number wasn't even on their files, but they said they were made from 1956-1958. Is that true? I've seen a model 68 advertised as a 1980 model.

Also, the number I gave her for the model 273 came up as a model 100-92, and it was made in 1991???? It says model 273 right on the same plate that it lists the serial number. It is a Sperry New Holland...would that have anything to do with it?

That doesn't sound right at all. Any body else have any ideas? I'd like to know how old these balers are as I plan on selling one of them.

Thanks again, for the help!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
mn.Chuck

04-17-2006 16:20:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Difference between New Holland 68 and 273 in reply to ScottSD, 04-17-2006 10:52:44  
Tons of diff between the two. The 68 was built in
57/58. The 273 started 1968. The knotter parts do
interchange except frame. The 68 had wood slide
plunger bearings-273 roller Brgs. The 68 had a tine bar on chain feeder-the 273 a horizontal roll
6 tine feeder.(nothing wrong with the 68 baler in
any way) Both easy to work on and time. Someone
commented on a 2 joint PTO. Neither of these had
a two joint but there was nothing wrong with that
unless you used a tractor that was too big for a
baler tractor anyway. We sold and serv several
hundred NH balers over the years. Chuck

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
rleroy

04-17-2006 20:29:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Difference between New Holland 68 and 273 in reply to mn.Chuck, 04-17-2006 16:20:29  
Norm Swinford"s book on Ford New Holland says the 273 came in two versions, short-tongue two-joint power line or long-tongue three-joint power line. Also had standard pickup with four bars and 48 teeth or the Super-Sweep pickup with 6 bars and 120 teeth.

I have a 68 and it has a three-joint power line, two joints near the front end and a third joint where the line attaches to the flywheel. The flywheel joint doesn"t assist with turning so maybe this design is really called a two-joint power line. Comments anyone?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Leroy

04-18-2006 05:22:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Difference between New Holland 68 and 273 in reply to rleroy, 04-17-2006 20:29:54  
A two joint would only have the one at the flywheel and one on the PTO coupler



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMS/MN

04-17-2006 12:28:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Difference between New Holland 68 and 273 in reply to ScottSD, 04-17-2006 10:52:44  
273 likely has the SuperSweep pickup- teeth are about two inches apart, and pick up thin windrows better. Probably has a three u-joint pto line, instead of two- much better when cornering. I had a 268, extremely stupid design with two joint pto. Centerline of pto was less than two feet from pickup. Who has a 4 foot wide tractor? Bought a junk 269- only difference is the three joint pto, and switched it. Still, with the hitch offset, and the tractor set for 30 inch rows, drive wheel had to hug the windrow.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rexalot

04-17-2006 12:11:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Difference between New Holland 68 and 273 in reply to ScottSD, 04-17-2006 10:52:44  
I dont know when the 273 was built, probably 70s. The 68 started into production back in the late 50s. Not much has changed in in the basic design of your two balers. I wouldn't be surprised if the knotters aren't the same. NH dealer should be able to ball park you by serial number.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy