Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

W30 comparison for Shaggy and others

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Harold H

12-11-2003 05:24:21




Report to Moderator

Last night I looked up specs and Nebraska Tests to compare W-30 to other W models. In physical size The W-30 is closest to the W-6. W-6 shipping weight on rubber 4990#, 247.7 cu in engine. W-30 shipping weight on steel 4820# (rubber would be more), 283.7 cu in engine. In power I used distillate models of the 4, 6, and 9, because that is the only way the 30 and 40 were tested. In belt horse power it is cloest to the W-6. W-6 34.23 belt hp vs F-30 32.80 belt hp. In pounds pull it is closest to the W-6. W-6 4755 lbs ant 1.96 mph. F-30 4157 lbs at 2.24 mph (F-30 was on steel. Would be higher on rubber). In drawbar horsepower it is closer to W-4. W-4 21.38 db hp. F-30 24.85 db hp (F-30 was tested on steel, would be higher on rubber). For Nebraska Tests I had to use the F-30 test as I could not find the W-30 test. I used the distillate tests for all tractors to be on equal basis. The W-4, 6, and 9 were on rubber and the W 30 and 40 were on steel. Test# 342 W-4 distillate on rubber, 152.1 cu in, weight as tested 5690#, 23.11 belt hp, 21.38 db hp, max pull 3297# @ 2.21 mph. Test# 354 W-6 distillate on rubber, 247.7 cu in, weight as tested 7744#, 34.23 belt hp, 31.40 db hp, max pull 4755# @ 1.96 mph. Test# 371 W-9 distillate on rubber, 334.5 cu in, weight as tested 10,190#, 46.36 belt hp, 42.67 db hp, max pull 6577# @ 2.02 mph. Test# 198 F-30 distillate on steel, 283.7 cu in, weight as tested 5990#, 32.80 belt hp, 24.85 dbhp, max pull 4157# @ 2.24 mph. Test# 269 W-40 distillate on steel, 298.3 cu in 6 cyl, weight as tested 7625#, 49.76 belt hp, 35.22 db hp, max pull 4982# @ 2.62 mph. (Note, db hp and max lbs pull would be higher on 30 and 40 if they had been tested on rubber tires to equal out results).

Harold H

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Shaggy

12-11-2003 21:39:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: W30 comparison for Shaggy and others in reply to Harold H, 12-11-2003 05:24:21  
I just wanted to say thanks! It looks like you went to a lot of work or spent some time doing this. Thanks again Shaggy



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy