Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Attention Forum Users: On the 28th of December 2023 at 9:00am Central Time, we will be taking the forums down for maintenance while we prepare the new forums for your use. Please click here for more information.

Case Tractors Discussion Forum
:

Case 530 CK-1949?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Bob Greeley

11-29-2006 16:54:02




Report to Moderator

Would anyone know the gross weight of this machine?With backhoe and front end loader and without? Much thanks-Bob..




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
George S. in the real NY

11-30-2006 17:44:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to Bob Greeley, 11-29-2006 16:54:02  
530CK's were built in the '60s. Weight with #32 loader and #32 Hoe is just over 10,000# per the operator's manual. Can't recall the weight of the tractor only, it is in the manual but I'm at work now. HTH



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob Greeley

12-01-2006 09:32:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to George S. in the real NY, 11-30-2006 17:44:18  
HTH-interesting-another person said the total weight was 8,000 pounds, with all.

If you have the time, can you send me info on backhoe and bucket? Before I pick this up, I'd like to know correct weights-thanks-Bob..



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
George S. in the real NY

12-01-2006 20:41:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to Bob Greeley, 12-01-2006 09:32:31  
Here are the numbers out of the manual for the loader and hoe. Tractor with loader is: low of 5375 #(gas and dry clutch) to 5725# (diesel with torque converter). This includes the D13022 bucket and NO counterweight. With the #32 hoe on unit, gas/dry clutch is 8645# and diesel with TC is 8995#. My 10,000 was high but it is over 8000. Didn"t mean to scare you or take issue with other posts. It has been awhile since I looked at the data. Basically, if you can comfortably haul 10,000 then this should be OK. More than I would want behind a pickup. Hiring equipment movers to move big stuff is money well spent as if anything goes bad on the road, they have to deal with the bears. I have a D-8 with blade and ended up hiring the move done. They had permits, wide load signs, flashing lites on the truck and their insuance. $300. to move about 40 miles but it was all done in 3 hrs. If it helps, get back to me and I can give you the name of the firm that did that move. They operate over much of the east half of US. George

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob Greeley

12-02-2006 09:31:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to George S. in the real NY, 12-01-2006 20:41:23  
George-this is great info-I really appreciate your help-I am moving this item from Kansas to Colorado for restoration (app: 700 miles).
Interesting-I have another person waiting for your info-he is moving one from Michigan and needs the weights also.

You have bee a great help,George-thank you very much-Bob...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
chvet73

11-30-2006 08:22:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to Bob Greeley, 11-29-2006 16:54:02  
The whole package is about 8000#. I don't know about it in parts.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob Greeley

12-01-2006 11:24:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to chvet73, 11-30-2006 08:22:29  
Hate to be a pest,but George S. in the real NY (message)states this machine totaled is 10,000 pounds-I have to pick this up in three weeks and would like to know exactly what weight this is-do you still think this is 8,000 pounds?Bob...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob Greeley

11-30-2006 08:34:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to chvet73, 11-30-2006 08:22:29  
Thank you very much for info-Bob...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dctom

11-29-2006 17:29:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to Bob Greeley, 11-29-2006 16:54:02  
dont know the weight but it cant be 49, hast to be 60 or newer



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob Greeley

11-30-2006 08:35:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Case 530 CK-1949? in reply to dctom, 11-29-2006 17:29:33  
Thanks for info-Bob...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy