Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? vs. 8

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Nathan in Texas

09-06-2005 07:18:44




Report to Moderator

Well, I think when it is all said and done, I've decided the perfect tractor for me is going to be a 656 wide front end with a 5 speed TA. I leaning toward Diesel based on how everyone is always saying how much less fuel the diesels use vs. the gassers.

Well, when looking for one, it seems the gassers all have lower hours, seem to be in much better shape, and are cheaper. I guess that is because they have always been more expensive to run than the diesels. If I was going to be running one 500 or 1,000 hours a year on a full time basis, this would make a big difference, but I will be using it 100 hours a year max. Primary duties are mowing, grading, and I would like to find a quick dettach loader for it, and get into discing and planting sometime down the road and haven't ruled out haying with it. I only have 42 acres and 18 of those are in CRP so I'm not going to be using it a whole lot no matter what I end up doing.

At $2.50/gal with the gasser eating 3 gallons per hour and the diesel eating 2 gallons per hour that would be $750 per year for the gasser and $500 per year for the diesel. That would e a $250/year savings in fuel at 100 hours of useage. Does that sound about right? Does anyone have any real numbers on fuel useage on these?

How much more expensive is the diesel going to be to maintain? What problems am I going to be looking at getting a diesel with 8,000 hours on it vs. a gasser with 3,000 hours on it?

Also, I've seen a few diesels with hydros that seem to be in good shape. What is the bad thing about hydros again, just not as much drawbar power for heavy plowing?

Finally, what are the drawacks to a 706 or 806 vs. the 656? They seem to be a little cheaper but not much, and if the 656 is a better tractor then I think I'll just keep looking for a 656.

Thanks in advance for any input.

Nathan

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
the tractor vet

09-06-2005 18:53:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
I have run gassers for years and i do not find them any harder on fuel then a diesel If it is tuned correctly and the correct fuel is used in it there is not enough to worry about . And when something goes wrong with a diesel like the injection pump or injectors or it need an overhaul the gasser is a whole bunch cheeper to rebuild and if you are not going to plow 150 acres and disc it three time there is NO DOUBT in my mind that it would be a gasser Back when everybody went from gas to diesel there was a big price gap between the two Like gas was back then thiry cents a gallon and diesel was 17 cents a gallon and the tractors were getting bigger and to get a gasser to the 100 hp mark they needed to make a bigger gasser to keep up with the bigger diesels and yes a diesel is more fuel effcent and will last longer . As a chore tractor that will start in any weather as long as it has a good battery and is tuned the gasser is the way to go . All of my dairy farmer friends and customers have gassers for chore tractors and run them everyday . it is alot easier to get a gasser fired up on them cold mornings to move round bales or grind feed or haul manuar or move the snow. Now even though i am Red all the way thru i do not care for the 806 gasser but 756 on down are fine and for mowing and using a blade or loader i would say no more the 3 gal and hour and my 806 Diesel will use that much mowen and with the price of diesel at about the price of gas and for awhiel it was the price of high test around here.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
SMA in NE

09-06-2005 18:02:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
I have a 4020 gas that I bought for similar reasons you have mentioned. It was much cheaper than a diesel (about $3,000) and it had less hours so was in much better mechanical condition. My 4020 uses right at 5 gal per hour when I am working it putting up hay. I pull a 16' windrower and a JD 535 round baler. I would suspect a 656 with less HP would use less gas. It will certainly start easier in the winter and many of the parts are less expensive than on a diesel. For low hour usage I think a gas burner can be a good idea if you find the right tractor.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
VernMN

09-06-2005 16:59:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
Chances are you will find a gas in better shape and less hours than a diesel. And if you are an occassional user the fuel savings will not be too big. Hydros are sort of a novelty, but I had a hydro 656 gas and can say never again. A gear drive is easier and less expensive to repair.

A nice 806, go for it.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jfp

09-06-2005 11:21:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
I always recomend diesel. The wiring don't corrode as much, its more efficent. For heavy dirt work, stay away from the hydros, they are better in the hayfield. So decide where it will be used the most first. I had an old M once for bush hogging and couldn't keep enough gas in it. Go diesel, even if you have to rebuild it, it will last longer. JP



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tim IN

09-06-2005 09:35:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
Seems like guys here always pooh-pooh the gas tractors, but I would strongly suggest it in your situation. You'll save up front right away and will probably not be using it too much or wide open. Around here gas is cheaper than diesel for the moment, so it would take many hours before any diesel fuel efficiency would be realized. They are all pretty good tractors.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nebraska Cowman

09-06-2005 09:24:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
My 656 is tuboed and I have to work the dickens out of it to burn a gallon and a half an hour. I'd guess a gasser would drink 5 -6 gallons doing the same work. And a gas Hydro? I wouldn't even want to be near one. I'm afraid I would be in danger of getting sucked into the carb along with the gas.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nathan in Texas

09-07-2005 08:24:32




Report to Moderator
 Test Results in reply to Nebraska Cowman, 09-06-2005 09:24:08  
MrIH was nice enough to post the actual fuel consumption rates from the Nebraska Tractor Test results! Lets see if I can get them in a chart.

Model ----- 100% ----- - 50% -- gallons of fuel used per hour

Gas Gear ----- 5.2 ----- - 3.7
Gas Hydro --- 6.3 ----- - 5.2
Dsl Gear ----- 4.2 ----- - 2.6
Dsl Hydro --- 5.4 ----- - 3.9

MrIH mentioned that the Hydros were set at 2,300 rpm vs. 1,800 rpm for the gear drive so that explains part of the extra consumption for the Hydro. Looks like the Gas uses about 1 gallon per hour more than the Diesel and everyone was right on the Gas Hydro, it eats the fuel like nobodys buisness but the Diesel Hydro is close behind and actually uses more than the Gas Gear drive!!

The difference between the gas and diesel seems to stay the same at the reduced power. Using the unrounded numbers the Gas uses 1.009 gph more at 100% and 1.129 gph more at 50% - The diesel gets a little more efficient at the lighter load but not alot more than the gas.

At $2.50 per gallon the gas gear drive version will cost about $275 more to run per year per every 100 hours of operation on fuel costs. At 50 hours which is really the most that I would be using it that would only be less than $150 a year difference in fuel. I think I am going to keep looking but stick with the gear drives and not be too picky about whether it is a gas or diesel if the gas has a lot less hours and is in better shaper.

Thanks! Nathan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
PaMike

09-06-2005 09:37:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nebraska Cowman, 09-06-2005 09:24:08  
He is right. HAD a 656 Gas hydro. Terrible, no two ways about it. I have a 1755 Oliver now that is 20 more hp and uses problaby 1/2 the fuel.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dhermesc

09-06-2005 08:43:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
With only 42 acres, the choice between gas and diesel hardly enter the picture in terms of fuel consumption. You are talking about a tractor that will see about 25-35 hours of use in a year. With those kinds of hours, your talking about saving $40-$80 a YEAR in the differance of fuel costs. How many years will it take to pay the premium of owning a diesel over a gas? If you were looking at 600-800 hours of operation in a year the diesel starts looking a lot more attractive.

The 6 cylinder gas in the 656 is more efficient the 4 cylinder in the M, especially under light load. With the small acreage you are looking at I would concentrate on finding the one in the best possible condition. Your possible future repair bills are of much more concern then the differance in fuel costs.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dr.EVIL

09-06-2005 08:11:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Nathan in Texas, 09-06-2005 07:18:44  
656 gas probably uses more like 5 gal/hr, diesel 3-4 depending on load of course. Diesel would be much more efficient on light loads than the gas tractor. The 666 & 686 are essentially the same tractor, just newer. Nothing wrong with the 706 or 806. If I had my choice I'd get an 806 diesel. For light drawbar loads and loader work the hydros were great. But most were used rather hard, not maintained real well, and are expensive to rebuild.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
steveormary

09-06-2005 09:28:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to Dr.EVIL, 09-06-2005 08:11:06  
Nathan;

I believe I would look for a 656 or 706 gas or deisel. 806 might be too big altho one feller told me you can never have too big of a tractor.

Good luck
steveormary



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
octave

09-06-2005 18:29:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656: Gas vs. Diesel; TA vs. Hydro? vs. 706? v in reply to steveormary, 09-06-2005 09:28:55  
Hydro Is A NO ,NO Diesel has no equal period.
I under stand you will not be using it a lot per year. the biger the tractor the harder it will be on gasiolne.the gas tractor will use more gas than you think.
some thing else to think about. if you do not like the gas tractor it will be hard to sell the bigger ones you can not give the away.
Just my two cents & it does not mean much just some to think about

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy