Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: OT: Wolf


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Jerry/MT on April 26, 2010 at 07:49:09 from (206.183.116.129):

In Reply to: Re: OT: Wolf posted by wyod on April 25, 2010 at 19:53:29:

There in lies the rub. The initial definitions for "sucessful wolf re-introduction" were 300 breeding pairs and I believe 1000 wolves in the three state area(MT,WY,ID)and federally approved management plans in each state , encompassing those animals. MT and ID had their plans approved but WY hasn"t. However the wolf was delisted in MT adn ID. There is a suit pending in MT that argues because WY doesn"t have an approved plan, no delisting should take place because the total three state region does not have approved management plans. The so called "environmentalists" are also saying 300 breeding pairs isn"t enough to maintain genetic diversity so they are now arguing for more breeding pairs. THe USFWS disagrees with their argument. I don"t know how the judge will rule but the technicallity is that all three states were supposed to have aapproved management plans before delisting and they don"t because WY"s plan isn"t approved. WY is also suing because they say they have the right to determine their own management plan. And so it goes. What everone agreed success looked like in 1995 is now being questioned by the "enviromentalists".

I say a deals a deal; sucess is 300 breeding pairs in the three state region is what was agreed to and no changing the rules now. There eare more wolves then what was agreed to (1500) and they are reproducing at a rate of 20% a year! MT and ID is hoping their hunting seasons will stem the tide and "educate" wolves not to go around humans and livestock. But a wolf has to eat and feed its young so when they run through all the deer and elk, in an area, livestock is next on the menu. And these so called "environmentalists" are supposed to be educated people! Maybe so, but they have no common sense and they are selfish and sef centered in their goals. To hell with the people who have to live with their definition of the environment!


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Talk of the Town: The Saga of Grandpa's Tractor - by The following saga is from the Tractor Talk Discussion Forum. Someone. The saga starts with the following message: Hey guys I have a decision to make. I know what you all will probably suggest and it will probably agree with me way down inside, but here it is. I have a picture blown up and framed in my "tractor room" of a Farmall M. It was my Grandpa's tractor, of which whom I never got to meet. He froze to death getting this tractor out of the barn to pull a truck out of the ditch before I was born. Anyway my dad and aunt had to sell it at the auction, ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy