Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Fact or fiction?????????


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by ScottyHOMEy on December 27, 2009 at 18:20:45 from (71.241.192.127):

In Reply to: Re: Fact or fiction????????? posted by Scott in SF on December 27, 2009 at 16:51:17:

A gram of water will always act like a gram of water in its given state. And it is the basis of the VERY simple initial question. In the real world the question is theoretical, just as the snowball proposition, and, to my mind serves the same purpose, to illustrate the myriad real-world variables that have to be taken into consideration.

I'm talking about water. If we want to talk about salt water, hard water or carbonated water, then that's another discussion. You quite rightly brought up the effects of friction on a snowball traveling at a high rate of speed. As to our freezing water, others have brought up issues such as solubility of gases and minerals in the water which will affect the outcome.

My teacher might have tossed in the volume of the snowball as another red herring to drag us through a calculation of its density. He could have called it an ice cube instead of a snowball. His aim was to pose the snowball as an isolated system to test a)our ability to state kinetic energy (joules) in terms of equivalent calories and b) our ability to distinguish between velocity and momentum, and how those factors apply to such a case. If kinetic energy in joules is equal to the one half the mass (in kg) times the square of the velocity (in m/s), it all becomes simple, and the mass is irrelevant to the required answer. It works with one gram (not much of a snowball!), 500 grams, 5 kilos (the head of a small snowman). They will all, in isolation, melt at the calculated velocity. The only difference will be the total number of joules/calories released to do the melting when it hits.

If I recall, those of us that got it doubled the mass of the snowball to 2kg for ease of calculation, set the required number of joules equivalent to 10,000 calories (to raise 2kg of water 5*C).

1/2*2*v-squared = 41,840 joules
v-squared = 41,840 joules
v = 41,840sq/rt
v = 204.54 m/s

That works out to about 450 mph, which is a pretty peppy fastball, so I don't expect anybody I know will me meltin' a snowball on my forehead.

Those that didn't get the answer for the most part reduced that velocity to 51+m/s to get back down to the given 500g mass.

As someone else pointed out, water can exist in both liquid and solid states at the 0*C freezing point and there is an exchange of energy involved in the transition either way that didn't enter into our high school calculations, and there are other factors that get into it, but the point of the exercise was that mass, in isolation, is irrelevant, to the calculation of heat exchange.

Which gets to other points made. Freezing water in an ice cube tray is an entirely different proposition from freezing water in a pipe. It's not just a matter of the surface area which may hinder or enhance the rate of heat exchange, but also the effects of pressure within a pipe as opposed to water free to contract or expand.

I don't mean to be a pain in the neck. I'm kind of enjoying the whole thread. Theory vs. real world.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Fasteners: The Nuts and Bolts of Nuts and Bolts - by Curtis Von Fange. The nuts and bolts of nuts and bolts is an interesting and essential piece of knowledge that applies to our older tractors. An improperly torqued capscrew on an engine head or a shear bolt that is too hard on the driving shaft of a bushog can create havoc and make an expensive and uncalled for repair. Let’s examine the purpose and design of these fasteners in order to ensure their proper use. Fasteners are probably one of the aspects of mechanics that is given the least amount of thought. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy